Showing posts sorted by relevance for query 6 Underground. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query 6 Underground. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

Red Notice

2021, Rawson Marshall Thurber (Skyscraper) -- Netflix

What happens when you take a Ryan Reynolds vehicle for Netflix (failure: 6 Underground) and mash it with a The Rock vehicle for Netflix (OK, I want to say Hobbs & Shaw but it ain't) and add a dose of pumpkin spice latte, I mean, Gal Gadot? Well, in this version of the multiverse, you get Red Notice, which the trailer says is about FBI Agent John Hartley (Dwayne Johnson, Jumanji) teaming up with notorious art thief Nolan Booth (Ryan Reynolds, Deadpool) to capture another art thief, The Bishop (Gal Gadot, Fast & Furious) who has a red notice on her, basically a label for "the worst criminal ever, everybody AFTER HER !!" 

That is what the trailer says. Its a bit of a bait & switch. The movie is barely about the red notice. But they couldn't call it The Rock and Deadpool's Great Heist Day Out could they? Instead, we got the greatest of great popcorn movies, in that while I was watching I was thoroughly enjoying, as production budget and quips and great scenes and ever greater settings abounded. But then I burped and remembered how overly salted cinema pop corn really is.

So, basic premise is as above, but really its about Booth and Hartley chasing down three McGuffins -- booth even calls them McGuffins! They want to get them before the greatest art thief in the world ("second greatest!" yells Booth), the mysterious The Bishop, gets them. FBI: International tells us that the American national police force (the FBI) likes to send cowboys to other countries, where they have less than no jurisdiction, to catch Bad Guys, because... America. At least Hartley always has Interpol agent Das (Ritu Arya, The Umbrella Academy) always three steps behind him, remind him he has no jurisdiction, not that it stops him.

This movie is a mish-mashup of other genres and movie franchises wrapped into a standard heist flick. If Thurber does anything, is that he does a good job in keeping all these disparate elements coherent. They all really do seem to fit together in the movie. And that's a pretty big deal in these cheesy, popcorn action flicks these days, that are so prone to do things that just don't work, because the producer in purple had a great idea. I mean, they even steal scenes from Raiders of the Lost Ark without seeming too desperate for ideas. 

And, of course, Johnson and Reynolds have great antagonistic chemistry (Reynolds just loves playing difficult) that we cannot help but chuckle.

Wait a freaking second here, hold the horses, insert a record scratch. I started writing this post with full intent on saying This Was Not a Good Movie. Sure, it was not as astoundingly bad as 6 Underground but it was still pretty bad. I wanted to say that after the fact, after the burp, that I just did not enjoy it as much as I did while watching it. And yet, I forgave it a whole freaking lot. I should be whining more! I should be bitching more! I should be picking it apart more! But, I guess this is where we are, in that I had fun, despite Gal Gadot's sorely under utilized character and the entirely unneeded Shyamalan Twist at the end. Franchise wannabe's wanna be franchises. So yeah, I guess I got out of the movie what they wanted me to get out of the movie.

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

[We Agree] 6 Underground

2019, d. Michael Bay  - Netflix

The opening 20 minutes of 6 Underground is frenetic, aggressive, and overly self-satisfied. Bay produces a car chase sequence that not only isn't exciting but is genuinely upsetting in how it wastes all its talents and resources just to keep slapping us in the face with juvenile gags, purposeless dialogue (meant to pass as witty banter, I think), and protagonists who seem to constantly and senselessly endanger the public, and are pretty glib about doing so. The crashes are overblown, often absurd (Bay remarkably limits himself to only one Baysplosion here), but seemed to require a lot of effort, all for usually a 1-3 second cut so you can't even really marvel at them. This type of quick-cut filmmaking wasn't even really that enjoyable at the height of Bay's powers and now it just seems so passe.

It's not that the premise is stupid, because any premise can work if you treat it right, but Bay can't take anything seriously, and when he tries he can't stop himself from overly indulging in effects, explosions, wisecracks or dumb gags. There's no room for real emotion or sentimentality.

But yeah, this movie is bad. The story has terrible pacing. It keeps interrupting any momentum it gains with flashbacks and origin stories. There's no real character building, because that would entail spending any amount of time getting to know them with any earnestness. Halfway through the film we don't know these characters or have any reason to care about them or their safety.

Ryan Reynolds' voiceover continually pops in to tell us... something... but nothing ever meaningful. It's supposed to be background or insight but only serves to fill any quiet moment (like an establishing shot) with noise.

I got one laugh (when there was that nerdy kid sitting with them at dinner and Reynolds calls out that they perhaps shouldn't be talking about their plans in front of him) and I really only found the parkour sequences exciting (and for all the effort that went into car chases and gun fights, they're astonishingly tedious).  I guess the giant magnet was interesting, except Bay kept overindulging in juvenile gags and improbable effects.

Just...what a fucking waste of time, money, talent, resources.

(Toast's take)

Saturday, April 20, 2024

1-1-1-KsMIRT: whatever times five

K'sMIRT is Kent's Month in Reviewing Television, where each month (ha!) I step through the TV series I completed watching each month in the 1 Great-1 Good-1 Bad format.  These are shows I finished (or was finished with) in the past four-ish weeks.

This Month:
Doom Patrol Season 4 pt 2 - CTV SciFi/Max
The Completely Made-up Adventures of Dick Turpin Season 1 - AppleTV+
Girls5eva Season 3 - Netflix
The Gentlemen DNF - Nflix
Hijack - AppleTV+

---

Doom Patrol Season 4, part 2 [6 of 6 episodes watched]

The What 100: The Doom Patrol are fractured, again. They've lost their immunity from aging and they're not dealing well. Rita's starlet egocentricity can't handle the rapid aging. Cliff's Parkinson's is only getting worse. Larry is so petrified not of aging, or dying, but being alone that he pushes everyone away, including Keeg. Jane has lost touch with all her other personalities in the underground. Rouge fears she can never redeem herself. Victor wonders who he is, and what he can contribute, if he's not Cyborg. And, of course, weird shit and lots of swearing.

(1 Bad): It feels like so, so long ago that we watched Doom Patrol Season 4 Part 1, because it was. We put off watching it for months after it aired, wondering if we even cared anymore. With the DP it's not even superhero fatigue, because it's not really even a superhero show. It's just a show about weirdos facing even weirder threats that grounds itself in deep rooted issues of mental health.  No, it was just that sense of everything falling apart, which, with the Doom Patrol, has been from episode one. This is a dysfunctional family. And after a while, especially when everyone is keeping to themselves and not interacting except with hostility, it's not fun to watch.  So it was hesitation that put off watching this last batch of 6 episodes. I think the worst of it was stepping back in, because Episode 7, the first episode back, picks up directly from Episode 6 and, like I said, it had been a minute, and to be honest, I felt that same sense of fatigue.

(1 Good): While overall Season 4 pt. 2 was a mixed bag, more than a bit of a rollercoaster for each character (and the viewer), it had two incredible highlights, the first of which was Episode 9 "Immortimas Patrol". As has been the thing for genre shows to do since, oh, the late 90's and "Once More With Feeling", "Immortimas Patrol" is a musical episode, and in Doom Patrol's weirdest of weird ways, their Christmas Episode (with nary a hint of Christmas).  It was watching the Oscars back in 2022 when performing in the ensemble for Encanto's best song nomination when I saw that Diane Guerrero was not only a cast member of that film but could sing, and yeah, she gets to show that off here. Also, Oscar winner Brendan Frasier sing-talks his way through a song about trying to masturbate without interruption.  And there's the chorus of Sex Ghosts that keep popping up.  The songs here are written by Aliza and Talia Berger with music by Clint Mansell and Kevin Kiner (just an incredible duo handling scoring chores this entire series), and they are all really, really fun while also being story and character-centric.

(1 Great): The thing about the Doom Patrol is they were doomed from the beginning. The original team Larry, Rita and Cliff, were on borrowed time to begin with. So that they each meet an end is only fitting. But holy shit, do we ever get some closure. Rita passed away, and it's so sad, until her ghost emerges to orchestrate her own funeral. Larry and Keeg find beauty in endings. Jane finds a new path forward as a whole person, and with Casey, who isn't even really a person.  Victor continues to make his mark, his way. And Rouge decides to embrace her dark side, but possibly used for good? And Cliff spends his final days with his family leading to one of the most beautiful, tearjerking, and abrupt endings of any TV show ever. I still get weepy thinking about it.  For a static robot face, the Robotman head has been so incredibly expressive for 46 episodes and the hold on it for the final frame as the light in his eyes goes out is just a little bit of magic given the moments preceding it.  This show, while not always great, was always something special. 

META: Yes, I cried multiple times during the finale. Shut up. Stupid show.

--- 

The Completely Made-up Adventures of Dick Turpin [6 of 6 episodes watched]

(The Plot 100): Dick Turpin wants nothing more than to be a glamorous highwayman. He's not been much else in his life. He certainly does not want to be a butcher like his father.  So he sets out on finding a gang, and then gets to robbing stage coaches. But as a gentleman.  He leads with compassion and robs with kindness. Things don't always go well for him, but he can always hold his head up for being his authentic self. This attitude gets people's attention, and a scribe starts writing brochures of his adventures making him a celebrity.

(1 Great): Where each of the first four episodes was pretty much a stand-alone adventure, with a little continuity of world and character building, the latter two episodes are a two-parter, in which an even more decadent, charming, congenial, fancy highwayman, Tommy Silversides, turns up and out-Turpins Dic Turpin in every way possible. While almost every character in Dick Turpin is really fun, Connor Swindells who plays Silversides gives a next level performance. He's clearly dastardly, and up to something, but he is also incredibly charming and irresistible. It's not just the show telling us these things, but Swindells showing us them.  And then, in the second episode, there's the turn, and it's hilarious, giving Swindells yet another layer to his performance.

(1 Good): This feels like a sister show to Our Flag Means Death, as both are period-set comedies about relatively hapless, but good-natured men who want to participate in what are commonly seen as ruthless and violent criminal activities. Steed Bonnet from Our Flag... and Dick Turpin here are both in over their heads in their quests for excitement and adventure, while also retaining a positive outlook on life, and enforcing their own moral codes of gender and sexual identity positivity and inclusivity. They just want everyone to be their best selves.  It's hard not to be charmed by these shows ... unless you're one of these "anti-woke" toolboxes who can't see anything beyond their own limited perspective.

(1 Bad): I found Dick Turpin to be great fun. Solid cast, whimsical production, fantastic earworm of a theme, but it's a little...tame.  It's not trying to be edgy, and I get that, but it is rather... fluffy.  Where Our Flag... had some heft to it that grounded it in something tangible and emotional, Turpin is just a silly light comedy. I like the characters, but I don't feel terribly invested in them. 

META: I know Our Flag... has been canceled, and that it was on HBO/Max and Turpin is on AppleTV+, but I really, really, really would love a crossover between these two shows. They're so complimentary, it only makes sense. It won't happen, but I wants it.

---

Girls5eva Season 3 [6 of 6 episodes watched]

The Plot 100: A pregnant Dawn, a starved-for-attention Wickie, a newly empowered Summer and a very horny Gloria have forged out on their own, with all new material, really trying to will a resurgence into existence. But they find a tiny modicum of success in Fort Worth (singing a song about Fort Worth) and are nervous to leave even that glimmer of stardom behind. A bold move, Wickie takes all their money and books Radio City Music Hall as their big tour finale...a finale for a tour that hasn't even been planned.

(1 Great): Renee Elise Goldsberry as Wickie is a freaking force to be reckoned with. While all the cast are enjoyable, Goldsberry is next level, all the time. She's best know for being a key player in Hamilton but she's got incredible comedic chops that she shows off non-stop. The energy on screen doubles every time she's in a scene.  Wickie is reliably self-involved -- a generous archetype for comedy -- but Goldsberry plays Wickie's ego as a mask, and she's aces every moment she comes out from behind it (and nails even hard the mad dash recovery to get back behind it).  The spotlight episode of Wickie returning to her supportive, upper class family home is the season highlight.

(1 Good): Like the Tina Fey/Robert Carlock-produced 30 Rock and Kimmy Schmidt before it, Girls5eva is a joke machine. Just densely packed joke-after-joke-after-joke in such a manner that it's hard to take them all in. I find myself still processing one joke when two others have flown past me.  My favourite joke is the Mariotte Divorced Dad Suitelets as a setting and all the delicious comedy nuggets within (like the last minute, pre-wrapped birthday present vending machine and the "#1 Weekend Dad" coffee mugs). It is a show that begs rewatching for all the comedy nuggets.

 (1 Bad): I'm not going to complain about Netflix resurrecting Girls5eva after it seemed like two seasons, 8 episodes each, was going to be it. But I will complain about only giving it a 6-episode order, and what looks to be an extremely tight budget.  It's not necessarily the stripped-down sets or even the sparse extras casting (no crowd ever feels like a crowd), as a sharp director and production staff could definitely make it work. It's clear that the budget limitations extended to the shooting time, and there wasn't enough to do more elaborate camera setups to hide the flaws, or to do more takes and edit the scenes tighter.  This season, frankly, doesn't look very good. It looks like...Hallmark...just with dirty jokes.

META: I don't know enough about the production of this Netflix season, but it just doesn't hit as hard as the prior seasons. One of the key things is the songs just aren't quite up to the same bar as the previous two seasons. Where I would actually listen to the soundtracks to Seasons 1 and 2 on Spotify (oh, I'd do the Splingee) I haven't even been tempted by Season 3. But maybe upon rewatch I'll start getting "Inside My Sweater" stuck in my brain.

---

The Gentlemen Season 1(?) [4 of 8 episodes watched]

The Plot 100: UN Peacekeeping officer Eddie Horniman is called home after the death of his father. He inherits his father's title of Duke of Halstead, much to the chagrin of his complete fucktwit of an older brother. Eddie learns that his father had leased out the property to criminal organization, and now he's also in bed with them. Eddie endeavours to get them off his land and out of his life, but seems to just get more entrenched the more he does to try and get them out.

(1 Great): Kaya Scodelario as Susie Glass. She's the "handler", the "fixer", and the woman-in-control (but not in charge) of the weed operations. She's ultra-competent, calm/cool/collected at all times, and perfectly styled without being showy about it. It's a ridiculously charming and enjoyable performance, which makes it all the more sad that I didn't enjoy the show enough to stick it out for more of her.

(1 Good): The show looks good. Like, real good. It's got the same feel as any of Guy Ritchie's films about cheeky British criminals, which have, since Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, all had a visual pinache. Ritchie directs the first two episodes, and you can tell. Surprisingly, when Nima Nourizadeh steps in to direct the next two episodes, you can't really tell it's not Ritchie behind the camera. So cudos to the production team for maintaining a consistent sensibility. 

(1 Bad): Honestly, there was nothing outright "bad" about The Gentlemen, but it just wasn't clicking with me. Okay, maybe when they introduced Peter Serafinowicz (nailed it on the first try) as a very distinctive character only to promptly [spoiler for the first episode], I was quite deflated by that. That was bad.  Part of my lack of enthusiasm is Eddie is a bit of a nothing character. He has one goal, which is doing whatever it takes to get these criminals off his land, so there's not a lot else to that character. Everyone else seems to have something going on but Eddie's just this stoic, handsome, rich, military twat who isn't particularly skilled at anything. He's not exceptionally intelligent, or a great fighter, or quick on his feet, and that should make him a compelling lead, but Theo James plays him with a sense of authority that the show seemingly backs up, rather than it being the misplaced authority of a man in over his head. I also wanted more flirting between him and Scodelario, but it all stayed weirdly businesslike in the first half.

META: I loved Ritchie's first two films, then stepped away from his Swept Away vanity project and never really came back to him full time. Sure I saw the Sherlock Holmes movies and enjoyed them enough, and I did see Aladdin (a real "why bother" film), and I do really love Man From U.N.C.L.E.  but the thing that drew me to him in the first place, his stylish British crime flicks I've avoided completely. Rocknrolla, Revolver, Wrath of Man, Operation Fortune, and event the show's disconnected namesake The Gentlemen I haven't seen... but Toasty has... and it seems like he enjoys them.  I dunno...maybe I'll do a Director's Set on Ritchie and go through it all. 

---

Hijack [7 of 7 episodes watched]

The Plot 100: Idris Elba plays Sam Nelson, a guy on a flight from Dubai to London that gets highjacked by British nationals for unknown reasons. Elba's background is as a high level mergers and acquisitions closer, so he's used to high pressure situations and talking to/manipulating people. On the ground, meanwhile, is a series of people, including Elba's family and various officials, trying to discern if there is actually a problem.

(1 Great): This show is seven episodes of intensity. It's the first show in months that we just flat out binged out of a need to know more, tossing aside other, better shows, just to get through this compelling story.  It takes place in nearly real time, but never, ever calls attention to that fact. It very capably negotiates at least three, maybe even four dozen characters both on the plane and on the ground - passengers, flight crew, ground control, Sam's family, police, and government officials.  It's probably in no way accurate to real life, but it's an immensely engaging journey.

(1 Good): The show has one mystery, which is the "why". Why are these people hijacking the plane? It's a good mystery they tease out over the first four hours before the list of demands are revealed and then we spend the next half of the series being very aware of the additional threats posed beyond the airplane. As if things weren't intense enough. 

(Good 1.5: I liked that Sam is a guy with "a particular set of skills" but in this case it's not the answer to this problem. Sam is a negotiator, a talker, and he uses that skill a LOT to insert himself into the situation, sometimes unbelievably. But I like that Sam's negotiating skill is just as often not the solution as it is, and that he's not "the guy in control" of the situation, really, ever, and the real fact is no one is. It's just kind of chaos.)

(1 Bad): Peril fatigue. That thing when the main character is put into too many life-threatening situations and the audience starts to check out of the idea that he will actually be harmed. The final act goes maybe two unnecessary steps too far with Sam and the flight, and then there's additional perils happening on the ground. It's all a bit too much, and unnecessary. I think an epilogue as opposed to the additional bits of danger would have been better, even if it kind of broke the "real time" structure.

META: Famous handsome man Idris Elba is not just known for being famous and handsome, but also being incredibly charming and a pretty good guy. He's likeable, and I like seeing him in things. I don't see everything he's in but I am certainly drawn to things because he's in them.  This came out mid-2023 and didn't really move the needle on anything, but it went on my lengthy "to watch" list. I put it on to be background while working on the 2000th Post Spectacular, and got sucked in and distracted quickly.  

It's not a completely successful show, but it moves briskly and is very, very engrossing.

Friday, January 3, 2020

3 Short Paragraphs: Six Underground.

2019, Michael Bay (The Rock) -- Netflix


Yes, that was my first thought. And no that does not count as the first paragraph. This does. OK, technically the next does.

I am not a Bay Fan. But strangely enough, a fan of many Bay Movies. I have to admit, he does have style. And who wouldn't think, that when combined with Ryan Reynolds personality, there could be a little bit of over the top magic? Well, based on Reynold's promotion of the movie via social media, I sure did. His statement of it being the most baytastic Michael Bay movie of all times, and his counting of the number of the baysplosions, just sold it to me. Of course, we have to expect a bit of fourth-wall breaking or meta commentary from Reynolds, as he may have inadvertently type-cast himself (as himself) via Deadpool. Alas...

Reynolds plays <Insert Technology Billionaire>  man who becomes disillusioned with the world and decides to do something about it. Fund climate change? Feed the starving? Fuel research into world saving technologies? Nope, he decides to fake his death and recruit a bunch of <insert character card> cliche SMEs to help him take down definitively Evil (Big E) Bad Guys, of which there number Six. Six Bad Guys vs Six Good Guys. Cuz that makes sense.

The movie focuses on Bad Guy Number One, a despotic leader of a desert-y X-istan country. What follows are a bunch of highly Bay choreographed action pieces funded by Reynolds, who has a loose, badly put together plan that relies on... luck? First all, I get some of his hires, as they are worldly spies or hitmen, but why a doctor? Sure, have your Secret Base stocked full of doctors but bringing her along on missions full of guns and guns and guns and baysplosions? But it's Bay-tastic and doesn't have to make sense. So, then why... is... it... so... boring. I literally began following asleep as we jumped from one Baysplosive scene to the next, one Reynolds quip to the next, one super-saturated beautiful set-piece to the next. In the end, they kill one (ONE!) main Evil Bad Guy, so I assume he is hoping for a franchise? Not sure I will be there...

And they didn't even use the song...

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

Dueling 3 Short Paragraphs: Extraction

2020, d. Sam Hargrave - netflix

I'm kind of a sucker for films that are action-heavy yet quiet-and-brooding.  Some films do it better than others, where the lead character or characters still manage to take central focus, while lesser films will be primarily an action showcase with characterization rather sidelined.  And sometimes it's all about building a legend...a John Wick or a Snake PlisskinExtraction, written by Anthony Russo (based on the Ciudad graphic novel by Ande Park) and directed by Sam Hargrave (the Russo brothers' stunt coordinator on many of their Marvel films) more or less manages to succeed at being a character-focused, action-heavy, legend-building feature.

This guy is awesome.
Chris Hemsworth
plays Tyler Rake (not quite the same ring as a John Wick or Jack Reacher), a man suffering from PTSD following the loss of his child and living a hardcore, death-wish mercenary life since.  He's big and broad but not too big or too broad.  He's quick and powerful, and has experience.  He's basically the best in the business, working for an agency who brokers deals and supports in the field.  In Bangladesh, Ovi (Rudhraksh Jaiswal), the son of an imprisoned mobster is kidnapped as a power-play by a rival gangster. Rake and team are called in for the extraction by a desperate Saju, head of family security (played by the captivating Randeep Hooda).  But he doesn't have the funds to pay for their services so he actively interferes with Rake's escape with Ovi from the gangster and his ample forces.

This leads to a a violent pursuit throughout Dhaka, as we see the power the gangster wields over much of the city and its officials. Rake is advised to abandon the mission by his support squad but his own issues push him on to see it through, to ensure Ovi is safe.  The action is miles, MILES better than, say 6 Underground, it's clearly shot, expertly crafted, and it looks brutal and painful.  What's more, Hemsworth carries the emotional subtlety of the character well... he's not just a pretty, funny meatbag, he's got serious acting chops too.  The immediate finale is a little far-fetched but it's the main setup for Rake's legendary status... and with a second feature already greenlit I'm welcoming more, and hoping for something quite different (kind of like what Chronicles of Riddick  was after Pitch Black).

Monday, September 18, 2023

3 Short Paragraphs (Or Not): Heart of Stone

2023, Tom Harper (The Aeronauts) -- Netflix

This might be my death knell with espionage type thrillers, for while I was compelled enough to pay attention, I was not stirred at all by the characters, the world it was building nor any of the elements. And it wasn't fun enough to be considered a popcorn romp. But, no I cannot say I disliked, in fact there were many elements about it I rather enjoyed, but... only mildly. I might go so far as to say this was a ... Ryan Reynolds style vehicle like Red Notice or 6 Underground ? But it wasn't; it stands alone.

We begin with a spy operation in a casino atop the Italian Alps. A team of MI6 agents are there to extract an arms dealer but the op goes sideways and Stone (Gal Gadot, Knight & Day) has to emerge, secretly, from her role as operational support ("stay in the van") to move things along. She is, in truth, a member of The Charter who through ear pieces, a fancy quantum computer, and a holographic system, are able to assist Stone in ways other agencies can only presumably dream of. Think of it this way - she is masquerading as the real MI6 while The Charter is more akin to the Bond-ian MI6 with toys & gadgets and such. No matter, as the op fails anyway and the arms dealer dies. 

Soon after, the team finds itself in Lisbon tracking down the hacker who interfered with their Italy operation when they are attacked and Stone has to fully reveal herself in order to save the team. And then one of the team, Parker (Jamie Dornan, Fifty Shades of Grey), reveals himself as a Bad Guy and murders the rest of them; well, not Stone. His end goal had always been to find The Charter -- more specifically, The Charter's AI/Quantum Computer called The Heart. Getting Stone to reveal herself was his real objective. 

Of note, the Charter likes to label things like they were part of a deck of cards. Stone was The Joker. Not sure of the whole point of it.

Parker leaves Stone alive, and she is not really suspicious about it, she doesn't know he has implanted her with ... something. Once she returns to base, it activates, hacking The Charter computer system before she can tear it out. But not before the Bad Guys learn of the location of The Heart, in an airship which constantly moves in the lower atmosphere. Meanwhile, The Charter's command structure (four "Kings"; why not eight, Kings and Queens?) reveals they know who Parker is, someone who they left for dead in their own botched op in Chechnya. Parker is out for REVENGE ! (yawn)

At this point, I am just along for the ride. The notes and beats of this movie are classic second-rate spy-thriller. I was intrigued by the non-governmental agency of The Charter, but that has been used before as well, usually in cartoony level TV and movies. But they seem just as prone to deception and misdirection as the agencies they claim to be better than. I mean, Parker doesn't hide his appearance, so when Stone was embedded into that MI6 team, shouldn't have someone recognized him from his dossier? 

There is some rather unnecessary mass destruction, taking its notes from the (other) MI movies, which all boils down to whiney Bad Guy revenge shit. I get that this is one of the tropes of the genre, but I guess that cements my fatigue with it. Of course, Stone saves (most of) the day and The Charter rises from the rubble to fight again.

Migawds, I hate single-faces dominating the poster without any hint as to the movie they are promoting style posters.

Thursday, March 27, 2025

KsMIRT: Give the new recruit severance on paradise's shoresy

 KsMIRT = Kent's Month In Reviewing Television, in which I (Kent) review the television series I watched in the past month, which these days is not many. I don't know about you but I'm finding that starting into any new TV series to be daunting prospect. I think smartphones, social media, and video games have utterly decimated our ability to sit patiently, to relax into a passive activity like watching TV or movies. The new media is so build on providing tiny dopamine hits, whether it's in-game rewards or social media rage bait, or the constant promise of something more if you just keep scrolling/clicking/spending. So most of the TV shows I watch are subsequent seasons for things I already know I like, and in most cases, I'm either binge-watching through at a rapid clip, or waiting impatiently for the final episode so I can move onto something else.  

This Month:
The Recruit Season 2 (6 episodes, Netflix)
Shoresy Season 4 (6 Episodes, Crave)
Severance Season 2 (10 Episodes, AppleTV+)
Paradise Season 1 (8 Episodes, Disney+) 

---

The What 100: Having survived (barely) his ordeal in Prague, Owen becomes the Agency's fall guy. He's given nothing to do but while away the hours in his, literally, empty office. But when a package is delivered (though not for him) his boredome gets the better of him and he finds a new greymail case that takes him to South Korea, and finds him getting in the usual trouble with, well, everyone. The case finds a Korean intelligence officer effectively blackmailing the CIA into helping him recover his kidnapped wife, perpetrators unknown.

(1 Great) Just as with last season, Noah Centineo is the deserved lead of this show. He has a real capacity for switching between super-competent and fecklessness that this show absolutely requires. His character, Owen, is quick-witted, for sure, and capable of stepping well outside his comfort zone, but the show gives the character side moments to breathe, to take in the events that have happened to him (or are still) and Centineo captures the weight of these moments quite well. Owen is a man with a moral compass working in a field that not only doesn't respect morals but sees them as a hinderance to getting the job done, and we see Owen get ground down over these past two seasons. Why he persists is still unclear. He has something to prove.

(1 Good) I really enjoyed the fact that this season stepped outside of Vancouver and surrounding are for its production and actually ventured into Seoul. Theres a totally different vibe to that city that you can't replicate with, say, using some "little Korea" area in Vancouver as sub-in. But the series is a globe trotting one, and Owen is seen hopping around multiple locations, but none of them have the liveliness and vibrancy of Seoul. Teo Yoo as the greymailer and Young-Ah Kim as the deputy director of the NIS were both excellent and brought the exact measure of wit, charm and intensity that the rest of the show is constantly balancing. 

(1 Bad) The Recruit is not a reinvention of the espionage (or espionage-lite) genre, but it also isn't playing by the standard rules. It is a show that operates at a rapid clip, that jumps between its characters and their various settings with not a lot of segue, and asks the audience to keep up. It's not a complicated show, but it does throw a lot of information at you rapidly, and you need to keep up. Alongside Centineo, it's part of the draw, this propulsiveness. But at the same time, it is a bit taxing to follow all the characters, and how they fit into the larger narrative (but it is a process of discovery as it all fits). It's maybe even more to ask the audience to suspend their disbelieve as it expects you to think Owen is not completely falling apart given all his globetrotting (the jetlag must be insane). But part of the show being so Owen-centric, so focused on his pursuits is the excellent supporting cast wind up being very secondary in interest, and the level of investment in them is pretty small.  

META: 6 Episodes? Only 6 Episodes? A downgrade from last season's 8 episodes. I hadn't realized that it was only going to be a 6-episode season, and by all rights, it seems like it was truncated during production. The finale of the season is so very abrupt, and while it closes out the greymail case at hand it gives us no real closure on Owen or most of his supporting cast. If we were in old school, pre-streamer television, where a season of a series would run 22 episodes, this would have been a very satisfying middle arc, with a third act that gets real personal for Owen and shows us why he's doing what he's doing, and keeps doing what he's doing (and likely has something to do with his father. But no, Netflix's hesitant second season order shows no commitment to the series nor any confidence in its performance.  It took Netflix a month to renew it after the first season dropped and it similarly took it a month to cancel it after this second season. In a post-cancellation letter, show creator Alexei Hawley asked "Is two seasons and a movie a thing?"  I think a big-budget, big-screen version of this might work even better than a series. It was fun while it lasted.

---

The What 100: It's summer in Sudbury ("Sudvegas") and the Blueberry Bulldogs are celebrating their perfect season and championship win, maybe a little too hard. The boys who haven't gone home are busy tubing during the day and partying at every Sudbury landmark at night, and won't rest until they get accepted into the not-so-secret secret club Weird Sudbury. But Nat signs them up to be mentors, which curtails their party-hearty lifestyle. Meanwhile Shoresy has called it a career and doesn't know what's next, as Nat tries to convince him to coach, and his attempts at being an on-screen personality for a Bro-Dude sponsored sports show has mixed results. He also get serious about moving his relationship forward with Laura.

(1 Great) One of the subplots of the season was Shoresy's continued wooing of Laura Mohr. That Shoresy started out life as a faceless, crass, shit-talking nuisance on Letterkenny, and has somehow manifested into a viable romantic comedy leading man this season was both wildly unexpected and pretty damn cute. As with the good below, one of his young mentees he also takes under his wing showing him how to show a lady that not only are you interested, but you're willing to put in the effort. It's a great counterpoint to toxic masculinity which says you are owed a woman's affection, and here it's telling a male audience that you have to earn it.

(1 Good) Each episode of Shoresy comes with some exceptional laughs. Keeso is a big fan of repetition as comedy and knows how to employ it.  But the greatest bits of the season came from the Bulldog's mentoring of a quartet of young high-school players graduating to bigger pastures. The elder generation of hockey jocks wrestling with the progressive aspects of the younger generation (such as the fact that they don't fully change in the dressing room or shower so as not to make any one uncomfortable) is a pretty sharp examination of societal norms. If we're seeing things from Shoresy's perspective, everything these kids are saying is absurd, and yet, when the kids explain the reason behind it, there are kernels of sense (like Letterkenny, I appreciate how the show is willing to wrestle with topics rather than decidedly make a stand).

(1 Bad) The show continues to twist me in knots though, as it, much like Letterkenny, toggles between respecting women almost to a level of worship, and objectifying and sexualizing them. The main female cast is almost uniformly adored, but any non-speaking role, any of the girls that the celebrating Bulldogs are picking up night after night, are just slow-motion ogled by the camera. It's a carry-over from Letterkenny that has been even further exacerbated this season with the excuse that the Bulldogs are slutting it up something fierce. Hockey players pull and a lot of these four seasons of Shoresy have "locker-room talk" which is part of the territory, but the show makes a choice to "lads mag" it up with its ogling and it just never sits right.

META: Look, I'm not a jock, never been a jock, and actively disliked the whole jock mindset most of my life. Shoresy is a show about jocks - obviously hockey jocks, to be specific - and yet, as we wade into trade wars and aggressive political stances with our suddenly unfriendly neighbour to the south, perhaps the "slug each other in the face when we're disrespected, and crush each other into the boards for a while, then shake hands and say 'good game' when all is said and done" is maybe more of what we need right now. "Elbows up" as they say. Fight on the rink then leave it on the ice.  The thing about Shoresy that I like is it has a code. Just like Letterkenny before it, there's a code of ethics involved, a sense that, no matter who we are in life, we should be decent people and treat each other with civility if not always respect. We are not islands upon ourselves, we're parts of communities, parts of teams, and we have a responsibility to each other. It's not a bad message, if I'm being honest.

---

The What 100: When we last left the crew from Lumin Industries, the innies got out into the real world thanks to hijacking the "Overtime Protocol". The world found out, and Mark, Irving, Hilly and Dylan were heroes (if just for one day), their outing rippling down to the severed floor, now led by Mr. Milchick, with some performative changes. But nobody, not a one, seems happy to be back, and the changes underground seem to only exacerbate the idea that they are imprisoned. 

(1 Great) The first season of Severance was pretty fixated on the world building with a measured hand in developing the characters. The time split between the innie and outie worlds found the innie world to be a surreal Lynchian workplace daymare, while the outside reality could only follow Mark (Adam Scott) for very specific narrative reasons. With the "Overtime Event" exposing the external lives of Irving (John Turturro), Helly (Britt Lower) and Dylan (Zach Cherry), we actually get to deepen our understanding of these characters. Irving's Innie has become utterly disillusioned with all that he once held dear, and his outie has become similarly obsessed with Burt's outie (Christopher Walken, whose shifting between charming softness, simmering danger, and seemingly violent intensity is just masterful). Dylan, for his "good behaviour" (read, betrayal), gets to meet his outie's wife, but in the process becomes even more obsessed with his outie's life than ever. Helly wrestles with her identity as an undercover Eagan, hating her outie, while Helena Eagan becomes obsessed with the liberties Helly has experienced not being known as an Eagan. Mark, on both sides, obsesses over learning that Ms. Casey (Dichen Lachman) is actually his (presumed dead wife) and seeks to re-integrate. Even the exterior worlds, such as they are, of Seth Milchick (Tramell Tillman) and Harmony Cobel (Patricia Arquette) get explored this season, with Milchick's new role proving more and more uncomfortable and Cobel's rebellion against Lumin shedding the smallest glimmer of light on what is actually going on. In this much more character-focused season (where we get a whole episode dedicated to Ms. Casey and another - shot in Newfoundland - that gives us a sliver of insight into Harmony's story) the world building takes a backseat. This is not to say there isn't any, as there is plenty, but it's not as front-and-center as it was in Season 1.  It's a pretty wise move, to further invest us in these characters, rather than just playing with revelations of the setting, and I think it pays off well this season, but will pay off more in the long run.  The side effect of being character focused is it's juggling more story balls. Mark was the center of the world last year, and now he's sharing the spotlight he once held with five others, so the end result is a season that feels less focused because it is... and yet it's all building upon what was established last season. It offers some answers, but not in any way that is satisfying, despite being tremendously enjoyable.

(1 Good) The world of Severance continues to intrigue me. It's clear now that Lumin Industries is a far-reaching, global brand with its hands in many, many pies, but we're offered only a miniscule tidbit of what its business really is. They have, at the very least, a pharma wing (as Helena Eagan tries to explain her Innie's public outburst on utilizing a non-Lumin branded medication...always schilling). We see in the Harmony Cobel-centered episode that Lumin gave birth to many towns, and subsequently destroyed them, leaving hard feelings and addictions in its wake.  It is clear that there's a cult-like aspect to the Eagan family that casts allusions to some Scientology practices (such as how it grooms its children through structure programs) but isn't going for a direct parallel (this religion is as much about capitalism, control and subjugation as it is about worship in a much more direct manner than most real religions are). I love that the world of Severance seems kind of stuck aesthetically in the 1980s and yet everyone has smartphones. This season is less fetishistic of its retro-futurism, and presents its irreverence (such as the goat people) in a clumsier manner than last season, but it's still so very, very stimulating to behold and try to puzzle out. It's this type of reality where you really don't want too many answers, because one answer that's less satisfying than the multitude of possibilities your brain might tease out.

(1 Bad) There really isn't a "bad" this season, except, for me, the return which, after 3 years, didn't quite live up to the explosive promises of the end of season one. I think I like it better this way, because the end of season one felt like a fire had been lit and it could have raged, but the showrunners are content to let it smoulder. They introduce in the first episode new work-mates for Mark (including Alia Shawkat and Bob Balaban) but it's a total fake out and they're gone within the same episode, which is too bad. They were certainly exciting additions for a brief moment.

META: It's been almost 3 years since season 1 and the wait, somehow, didn't feel all that excruciating.  The show, as I described in my review of Season 1, is slow sci-fi, and with that subgenre comes patience. I've waited patiently. I think Kier would be proud.  The reality of Severance is still so...well, if not enticing then curious, and I find it so compellingly bizarre.  The message of the show, the "work-life balance" and the bullshit of corporate "employee first" initiatives is the satire in the background this season. It's nudging metaphorically at the tools that big organizations use to keep their employees placated so they don't revolt, but it's happening nonetheless. Corporations have a mandate to make shareholders money, and not to make employees happy. Throw in organized religion, which is all about control, and often about money, not actually about the people. I love this show. It's been said the creators know where it's going and where it will end. I'm eager (not Eagan) to see.

In my post-season engagement with podcasts and episode breakdowns, I was reminded that there's an aspect of the show that's dealing with emotional pain, and that a major aspect of Lumin and the religion of Kier is about managing or eliminating emotional turmoil. By the final episode we get a glimpse of their master plan, a rudimentary understanding of the "mysterious and important" work that the Macrodata Refinement team on the severed floor is doing, and why Mark is so central to it all. It's not 100% clear, but it is most definitely insidious. Ready for more, but willing to wait.

---

**WARNING: SPOILERS FOR PARADISE***

The What 100: The president has been murdered in his home (not the White House though). Secret Service Agent Xavier Collins breaks protocol and waits on calling it in, assessing the situation for himself. This gets him suspended, leaving him to investigate without any official support. 

And, oh yeah, did I mention, the world has ended, and this all takes place inside an engineered safe haven of 25,000 people inside a mountain in Colorado? No, oh. That's part of it.

(1 Great) Episode 7 of the series takes us through the final day inside the White House before the world ended. It builds on so much of what we've seen before in the series, as well as fills in so many of the gaps. James Marsden's President Cal Bradford is a heavy drinking patsy of the elite, placed into power through his mining tycoon father and rich donor pool, but a man who is torn between doing the job he *should* be doing serving the people, and maintaining the favour and goodwill of his allies. In the final hours, both before the disaster that befalls the Earth, and the last days of his life, Cal reconsiders his position, and what is right. There's the moral choice but also the responsibility of being the bearer of bad news, and the fallout that comes with it. It's pretty meaty, if only in subtext. Episode 7 mostly focuses on Sterling K. Brown's Xavier as he negotiates his role keeping the President safe and securing his evacuation while, at the same time, trying to get his family to safety as the infrastructure collapses.  Episode 7 is a very well-thought-out, and very well-executed, a uncomfortably intense end-of-the-world scenario that has layers that keep peeling back until we return to the modern day. 

(1 Good) Billionaires *are* the worst, aren't they. We're going to get a flood of entertainment that will be reinforcing this over the next few years, and we need to keep that pressure on. Billionaires are not superheroes, they are the villains of the piece.  The narrative of this show is unravelling the origins of Paradise and how they tie to the death of the President who was at the helm when the world ended.

(1 Bad) We're dealing with Americans who develop an idyllic small town where the elite and the specifically chosen get to live. It seems both kind of magical and also totally *the worst*. It is an interesting society whose sci-fi sociological aspects are explored primarily in the background (this is not "the bad", in fact it's pretty compelling). It should be a society that need not worry about violence if it's such a carefully chosen community, and yet the president has an pretty sizable security detail, and there seems to be other behind-the-scenes security that seems excessive for a community of merely 25000 people. They don't carry sidearms besides stun guns, and one Secret Service agent laments the fact that she can't hold a proper gun (and later says "Feels good doesn't it?" when she gets one).  But of course there are guns. It's America, there are always lots and lots of guns. And a major plot point in this series revolves around not just a gun, but all the guns, and it seems so ... ugly... when our hero, our chief protagonist, the best of the best guys Xavier runs around waving a gun in someone's face demanding answers.  I wish the show were more inventive and thought of another way to run the same scenario without needing to be militarized up. It is a commentary in and of itself, and it is also commented in the show the fact that this cache of weapons exists at all. I just expected better and expected more out of our heroic characters than to fetishize the almighty gun. Bleh.

META: Toasty told me about this show last week and immediately had me intrigued. To paraphrase what he said "it's a show that starts off thinking it's about one thing, solving a murder, but then reveals it's totally something else". And he's not wrong. The murder of Cal Bradford is such a small, if central element of the series. It negotiates many characters, their back stories, their past lives and present lives, their dynamics with each other, their families, and the impact of their families on who they are today all while pursuing the perpetrator of this murder and exploring this new community coming out of the ashes of the end of the world.  The sky is digital, and it's one of the first things that tells us nothing is as it seems, but hardly the last. It's not a conventional murder mystery. You're not necessarily going to be able to figure out the answer until they reveal it to you, but it doesn't matter because the journey overall, and the world building, is pretty engrossing.  It hints at where a second season could go, and while it doesn't demand such, I would definitely watch, understanding it would be a much different show, particularly in structure.


Friday, August 16, 2024

The Dark Year: Deadpool 2

Because we never have enough projects in this Blog, I am creating one of my own, wherein I indulge my desire to rewatch a movie (because sometimes a rewatch is easier than absorbing a new movie) but also fill in a blank left by the Great Hiatus of 2018. It will be more interesting to me to see what I will be willing to rewatch, than see what I missed writing about.

Technically, this was a rewatch of  "Deadpool 2: Super Duper Cut".

2018, David Leitch (Bullet Train) -- download

To (pseudo) quote Kent, and NTW, "You're exhausting."

Not sure if it was a good idea to watch the extended version as a reminder of the movie and to build a post for what was lost. This one is just a smidgen too much of an untethered Ryan Reynolds, and yes, kind of exhausting. Of the fifteen extra minutes of footage, about 4 minutes are worth the maximum effort put in to produce a "director's cut". And the alternate music chosen is... painful.

Anywayz, still loved it as a whole and for some very specific points, but again, not as much as the first movie. I think the first is pretty much a perfect movie for me.

The movie begins with Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds, Bolt Neck) post Deadpool doing his best, fucked up version of being a superhero -- killing all kinds of bad guys from around the world. This opening is where a lot of the extended footage goes, so Mr. Pool can kill and kill and kill and chop and quip his way through tons of Bad Guys. Someone on the team must have really liked that iconic "smashing through the glass" scene in Ghost in the Shell (both anime movie, and IRL movie) as they pretty much recreate it. And a weird twist is that because the scene is extended, they have to replace the Dolly song with a longer one. Doesn't work.

Anywayz, one of the Bad Guys that Deadie misses killing (still not sure why he runs away from them; he shouldn't have any problem with a bunch of thugs) comes back and, well... the cheese spreader misses, the bullet kills Vanessa (Morena Baccarin, Greenland). Cut to James Bond-ian opening credits featuring Celine Dionne doing her song "Ashes" while the credits react to Vanessa being killed in the same snarky manner as the first movie's credits. Its really, truly effective, but I have to say I still prefer the Jordan Smith version of "Ashes" as it carries more pathos and less diva. I believe that appeared in the yet-another different version of this movie, the Once Upon a Deadpool PG version.

Enter Deadpool trying to kill himself montage (some extra stuff), ending with his apartment filled with barrels of something fiery and KABOOM.

Didn't the explosion kill a lot of people in his apartment building or is the disrepaired state we saw the place, in "Deadpool" implying its an abandoned building he is squatting in? That might be me trying to forgive the fact that he really is truly a sociopath who wouldn't care if he killed dozens in collateral damage.

Enter Colossus (Stefan Kapicic, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare) stuffing his body pieces into a bag and dragging him back to the X-Mansion. This is the aspect of the plot I don't really care about, and yet, is essential to the story that Ryan Reynolds is trying to tell, probably something to do with contrast -- Colossus really wants to redeem Deadpool, have him become a proper "hero". Deadpool resists but eventually, seemingly, submits to the will of Colossus and is allowed on a mission as a "X-Man in Training". He gets a training tshirt.

Don't forget your favourite relationship in the whole franchise -- "Hi Wade!! Hi Yukio!"

Said first mission -- The Home for Wayward Mutants *ahem* "Essex House for Mutant Rehabilitation", basically a place for mutant children to be dumped, and abused by a sociopathic headmaster & staff. Deadpool makes some rough attempts at calming Russell (Julian Dennison, Godzilla vs Kong), the angry fireball-using kid, down but eventually he figgers out what is happening to the kid(s) and kills one of the staff. I think he also gathers that the (run) DMC ("Dept of Mutant Corrections") that showed up have mutation-suppressing technology and that could work on him, allowing him to die. So, bang, one dead pedophile, one disappointed Colossus and the two of them are off to the IceBox.

So, Russell is condemned to a maximum security prison for... lighting a few fires? There's no legal activities, no court, no sentencing, just .... clink, you're in jail ? And he's a minor !!

Also, the IceBox is supposed to be in the North West Territories, so would that make the city this movie takes place in actually Vancouver? Nah, as it appears to be in driving distance of said city, likely the IceBox is in the Rockies and the city is some west-coast California fictional city.

Prison. Deadpool with no powers, and many kinds of cancer just reappearing in his body. You would think they would grow back slowly in his healed body, but whatever, plot. We get lots of usual prison antics, and Russell seems to have taken Deadpool seriously in the opening bit, because he thinks they are friends. Deadie makes sure he knows otherwise, so Russell befriends the monster at the end of the hall -- Juggernaut. They don't say Juggernaut but we all know its Juggernaut. 

Then Cable (Josh Brolin, Old Boy) appears to blow shit up with his electro-splosive gun that Goes to 11. Shit does blow up and the two of them are knocked outside, where Deadpool... almost dies? Anywayz, one loverly vision of Vanessa telling him its not his time yet, and he has to save Russell.

Why doesn't Cable just dust himself off and climb back into the prison to finish the job of killing Russell? Cuz plot.

So, now we get the fun-tage act of the movie where Deadpool decides the best and only way to save Russell is to build a team. Over an undetermined amount of time, but it must have been long, he recruits, interviews and assembles his new team X-Force. He also hires/buys a helicopter and crew? This whole act, including the giant action set-piece that follows, is the most fun the movie has. There are injokes, Marvel references, horrible deaths, micro-cameos and the best character in the entire movie -- Domino (Zazie Beetz, Joker), who's power is luck -- and apparently a substantial lack of empathy cuz the collateral damage she "causes" is scary. But she is the perfect antidote for Deadpool's quippiness with her own droll brand. The action set-piece involving a fight between Cable, Deadpool, with some of Domino's help is this movie's (s)equal to the opening sequence from the first movie, i.e. lots of slowmo and weird/fun angles. It ends with Deadpool literally torn in half by The Juggernaut (Ryan Reynolds, 6 Underground), after he fanboys / breaks 4th wall, out. Domino collects up the pieces.

Or at least one half. What does happen to the "pieces" of Deadpool after he begins healing? Do they quickly decay and melt away or are there parts of him rotting all over the city. Also, and its referenced briefly in-movie, does his head grow a new body or do they just jam the pieces together and watch them reattach? Probably not or we wouldn't get our whole shirt-cocking baby-legs joke segment, but that makes me (him) wonder why everyone still collects up pieces when all they need is a head and whatever is attached.

So, in the last act, Russell has escaped with the help of The Juggernaut. Everyone knows he will go kill the headmaster who abused him. Cable shows up because he wants help. He also monologues the reasons why, and Deadpool convinces him to at least give Russell a chance -- if he Deadpool stops him from killing the headmaster, he stops him from becoming a kill-addicted psychopath in the future that murders Cable's family. Cable is not fully convinced, but....

Its just an OK act, focused equally on the "CGI fist fest" between Colossus and Juggernaut, and Cable & Deadpool killing a bunch of basically unarmed medical attendants -- sure some have shotguns, and they are all labelled "pedophiles" and are guilty by association, but reminder (!!!) sociopath !! Domino is also in the background realizing her whole reason for being in the movie was to end up here, as she was raised in the orphanage. So, she gets to murder some staff as well, while saving kids. 

I am kind of meh about this whole fight, but it is fun to see Colossus just let loose. It all ends with Deadpool finally, truly dying, sacrificing himself for Russell. It does affect him, it DOES stop him from becoming a murder-y fire-fist in the future, and Cable is impressed. So much so that he uses his last bit of time-juice to go back and slightly alter the scene -- Russell is still saved, still doesn't become murder-y, but Deadpool lives.

Happy ever after.

Closing montage of more referential material of Deadpool with a now-fixed timey-wimey device "setting things right" including killing his alternate version from that Wolverine movie, and killing Ryan Reynolds before he plays Green Lantern. Light chuckles. Again, like Kent, by now I am just exhausted. Also, the whole "kill Hitler" scene doesn't make sense especially since the whole point of the movie is that you shouldn't kill people as kids just because they are evil as adults.

Its a fun movie, a LOT of fun. I really do prefer the edited-down version, despite having a historical fondness for "director's cuts". 

Oh, we can't wait for your post about the uber-mega-super-long "Rebel Moon" movies !!! Squeee....

Saturday, November 5, 2022

We Agree: Barbarian

2022, d. Zach Cregger - Disney+

If you're hitting this post before Toasty's post... a bit of warning... basically the same warning I heard countless times before every podcast that talked about this film (and that was like 6 or 7 of my regular podcasts)... this is one of those films that the less you know before entering the better.  And I mean knowing absolutely nothing.  Not even the synopsis on the movie booking site. Definitely not the trailer.  Just know nothing.  Because this film reveals itself like an onion, just layers upon layers.  

The short review: it's a blast.  It's a well made film, with really good acting, a lot of great creepy scares, and also a lot of big laughs.  Aspects of it don't hold up to intense scrutiny but none of it matters while watching the film, because it just keeps revealing itself in more and more surprising ways.  But that's already saying too much.

So, seriously, if you have any interest in watching this film, turn back now.

---


So you're still here...or you're back after watching.

I'll be blunt, because I don't want to set expectations too high, Barbarian isn't a great movie, and yet, it's a really, really fun experience.  Like Malignant it's just ridiculously entertaining, but unlike Malignant it has purpose behind its jump scares and tropes-playing.  Toasty gets into some of the early specifics, but the film, whether you like the payoff at the end or not, brings it all together.

Barbarian comes from the mind of sketch comedian Zach Cregger, who, like Jordan Peele, is able to tap the same vein for both horror and comedy quite expertly.  Both comedy and horror derive from the unexpected, and I found myself laughing at the same time as my heart was utterly racing throughout this film. And also like Peele, Cregger seems to either be innately good at positioning his lens, or has found a brilliant cinematographer in Zach Kuperstein (not to mention the lighting department) who deliver some of the best underground tunnel imagery in a long time.

The film is like (at least) four different horror stories in one.  At first, as Toasty explained, there's the Air B'n'B horror, of finding your rental is already occupied.  This is all taken from the feminine lens, the cautiousness and intensity of facing a stranger in exceptionally uncomfortable, suspicious circumstances and never fully letting your guard down.  Here though, Tess (Georgina Campbell), tries to do everything she can to be cautious and mindful.  The film at the same time plays with the expectations of the other side, first by placing Keith, played by Pennywise himself, Bill Skarsgard on the other side of the door.  Handsome, tall, imposing, with those sunken sleepy eyes... he's intriguing but also a little off-putting.  His awkward congeniality and up-front acknowledgement of all the cautious moves that Tess is makig only heighten the tension, rather than deflate it.

Even as the film starts to put us at ease about Keith, it never fully relinquishes that tension, our guard is never really down around him.  But it finds new terrors to confront us with, like mysterious noises at night, doors open or closing seemingly on their own, and Keith's night terrors.  Then, the next morning we see the neighbourhood, an old Detroit suburb, completely abandoned save this one house.  

Later that day, we discover the second horror film.  Tess, coming back to the B'n'B from a job interview is chased down the street by an unhoused man, screaming at her to not go in the house.  The secrets of the house start to unfurl, a secret door to a secret hallway and later a secret room (a video camera, a filthy mattress and a bucket).  Is this something to do with Keith?  When he shows, and Tess tells him they have to leave, Keith can't just believe her and needs to go see for himself.  And when he does, he disappears for too long, which means Tess goes looking for him, to find one more trap door, and a long, deep stairwell to underground tunnels full of darkness and disturbing things, and something moving amidst it all.

Our second act, and third horror, finds Justin Long's AJ, working Hollywood actor, just living high on life driving along the California coast, when a phone call rocks his world.  Long and short, he's cancelled.  The film toys with, for just a few moments, whether he's innocent of what he's being accused of... but really it's clear he is, just he doesn't know it.  He doesn't think himself a villain.  But he is.  And his journey is the horror of facing the music, of there being repercussions for his actions, bringing him to the house he bought as an investment property and wants to liquidate for his defense case.

It's the comedy and the horror of AJ, a man who, upon finding his house scattered with other people's belongings, thinks only the worst for himself, and not any sense of concern for them.  Upon learning Tess' identity, does he do any legwork to find out more about her, whether there's any trouble that may have befallen her?  Not a lick.  And when he finds the secrets hidden beneath, his immediate concern is not what terrors could have created such places, but rather, how can he capitalize upon them, can he count it all as additional square footage in the sale of the house, but his careless, carefree explorations (so drastically different in tone and swagger than when we followed the exact same steps a Tess) find the same trouble coming for him.

Act 3 brings us our biggest nightmare, stepping back in time 40 years to the dawn of the 1980s, same neighbourhood, the shiny brightness of Detroit's lustre not yet faded (but looming).  We meet the house's original owner, Frank (the Night King himself, Richard Brake), a tall, lanky, sallow man with a deep voice with little to say.  He leaves the neighbourhood on an extra creepy expedition for diapers, plastic sheets and gloves, talking about home births, and not a single good vibe coming off him.  Then he spies a woman as he leaves and we learn at least some of his modus operandi.  It's the film's origin story, so to speak, and also a very short segment of the film.  It's deeply unsettling, not just for what we do see, but what is left hanging.. all the insinuation of what this man does and the lengths he goes through to conduct his ugly deeds.

When we return back to the present, our "monster" is exposed (and I don't just mean fully naked) and the film sits perched precariously, teetering between absurdity and scary.  In a way the film doesn't want us to be horrified of this monster, because, as Tess is warned, there's something even worse inside.  And inside, even deeper in the tunnels, AJ finds yet another room, a room the monster won't go near.  Inside is Frank, and AJ is confronted with at least a few of his secrets.  The point is AJ, as a predator, isn't like Frank, but that doesn't make him any better of a person.  Whereas Tess, she IS a good person, the lengths she goes to in order to rescue AJ, and the price she pays for it is a large part of the point.

This is a film about how men and women look at the world. It's a film that points out that men, generally, have a hard time believing or trusting women, even about the smallest of things, never mind bigger things.  It's a film that highlights the everyday tension of being female in a world of men.  It's a film about the ugliness that men bring into the world, an ugliness that both lingers and spreads.  It may not all quite hang together under intense scrutiny, but it's an intensely fun movie, well acted, great-looking horror movie that actually has something to say.  It's only been out a month and it's already a cult classic.

Friday, September 15, 2017

20/20: #20 The Tick

[Like the "10 for 10" series but a little longer.  It's my endeavor to clean the backlog slate (with some things watched well over a year ago now) "this" month with 20 reviews written in 20 minutes (each) over 20-ish days...
That went well.]

2017, Amazon Prime - 6 episodes

The Tick comic book, when it emerged in, I want to say, 1989? was an underground success, to the point that Tick comics have been in continual creation ever since (though largely as a series of mini-series with sporadic publishing dates).  The Tick cartoon emerged in 1994 on Saturday morning Fox programming, and was a moderate hit with kids, but likewise a moderate hit with the college crowd.  I came to Tick with limited exposure through the comics and cartoon, but was fully on board with the Barry Sonnenfeld-produced, Patrick Warburton-starring live action the Tick in 2001, which, unfortunately, didn't even air all its episodes before Fox gave up on it.  It's had a healthy existence on DVD, which is more than I can say for the cartoon (where only 2 seasons have been released domestically, and even then each of the seasons is missing at least 1 episode).

Still, the Tick is kind of evergreen, it's a sort-of satire of superhero comics, but also just a straight-up lighthearted superhero tale.  It's never all that serious and it's genuinely fun.  Both my kids, with a 7-year-gap between them, love the Tick cartoon and they get it when my wife and I make casual or offhanded references from the show.  While the Tick is no Spider-Man or Batman or Mickey Mouse, the character and his strange, weird world have penetrated popular culture, and will continue to do so so long as its small and loyal fan base continues to dig what it dishes out.

The latest the Tick live action series from Amazon Prime certainly fills that need, but changes the scope of how the Tick has typically operated.  For the most part, in any media to this point, the Tick has been largely episodic, with self-contained stories and little narrative through line, but this run, which reunites the character with its creator Ben Edlund as showrunner, is servicing televisions modern, binge-minded nature. 

Arthur is, as he often is, the central focus, the grounding point. Here he's fleshed out as having some psychological disorders, anxiety and the like, which his sister Dot has made it her mission to keep in check.  Most of this stems back from childhood, where Arthur witnessed the super-villain the Terror force his favourite superhero team's ship to crash land on his dad, and then murder the super team in front of him, and then eat his ice cream.  Decades later Arthur is obsessed with the Terror, believing that he faked his own death, and spending most of his spare time looking for clues to his existence and whereabouts.  On one stakeout, he meets the Tick, and at first is unsure whether the Tick is a product of his own psychoses, or if he is actually the Tick, or if the Tick is indeed real.  He's very surreal, whatever the case.

The first episode was produced as part of Amazon's annual pilot projects, and was popular enough to be greenlit.  Nearly a year passed between the pilot and production of the remaining episodes but it's fairly seamless with the one major exception being the drastically different, and vibrantly bluer look to the Tick.  In the pilot the costume on Peter Serafinowicz is meant to evoke an insectoid feel, and a bit more of a natural sensibility, but going into production they wisely made him more flashy, bulkier and vibrant, more fitting with his place in the show.

The main thread of the 6 episodes has to do with Arthur and the Tick bonding, all while establishing the tremendous cast and their relationships with one another, and seeding in a bunch of background items, like the "Dinosaur Neal" analogue in "the very large man".  It's a darker version of the Tick, more cynical, more violent, plenty of swearing, but the Tick himself remains virtually unchanged.  From comics to animation to both live action, the big, blue dope has been fairly consistently written, exceptionally altruistic, equally oblivious, and utterly high spirited.  The endless enthusiasm Tick exerts would be exhausting if it weren't so amusing.  Here the Tick is used sparingly, perhaps too much so.  I really craved more and more Tick as it went on.

I've loved Serafinowicz since first really noticing him in an episode of Black Books, he's got an amazing charm and presence and I've enjoyed absolutely everything he's done, from Big Train to Spy to Guardians of the Galaxy to the little seen Will Arnette series Running Wilde.  That said, I was worried about him as the Tick... but then I shouldn't have been.  With incredible comedic timing and instincts, as well as a penchant for mimicry, he's able to replicate the Tick from the cartoon almost perfectly (a hint of his Britishness cuts through from time to time) but with his own panache to it.

Sure the effects are Janky and it's not as bizarre as the cartoon, but it remains boundlessly entertaining.  My biggest complaint would be the season is just too damn short.  Just like the last live action version of the Tick, I just want more.






Thursday, March 31, 2016

I Saw This!! Two Pair, Two Pair

I Saw This (double exclamation point) is our all-too regular feature wherein Graig or David attempt to write about a bunch of movies they watched some time ago and meant to write about but just never got around to doing so. Downloads come, downloads go. They slip in and fade out. How about a pair of "kids movies" and a pair of movies in bunkers?

Inside Out, 2015, Pete Docter, Ronnie Del Carmen (Monsters, Inc.) -- download
Goosebumps, 2015, Rob Letterman (Monsters vs Aliens) -- download
Air, 2015, Christian Cantamessa (writer of video game Red Dead Redemption) -- download
400 Days, Matt Osterman -- download

There used to be a world where we knew anything from Pixar would be great, at least in comparison to anything from Dreamworks Animation, which might be OK. As of late, I have been finding Dreamworks as often a notch above Pixar, almost a tag team event. How to Train Your Dragon and Megamind were incredible for the former, but does anyone even remember Home came out? Up and Brave seem forever ago and the rest, by the latter, were sequels. I hoped that Inside Out would be the return of Pixar, but in all honesty, found it very meh. Charming but meh.

The elevator pitch is great. You have four people inside your head, at a control room console, representing your primary emotional states: anger, sadness, fear and joy. Oh, and disgust. Is disgust even an emotional state? And no, Eddie Murphy is not one of the characters inside Riley's head.

Riley is the adolescent main (human) character who is uprooted from her mid-western home to San Francisco; Dad's new job. Puberty is coming and the emotions are having a tough time coping. There's been upgrades to the equipment and Joy does not have as much control as she once did. Then Joy screws something up and has to go on a quest to save Riley's delicate psyche.

Is this movie a metaphor for a terrible mental health care establishment?

Kent loved this movie but I never connected. For one, I couldn't sidestep my annoyance with there only being five emotions representing everything for everyone. I was hoping they might show some people who have five different primary emotions, or at least a couple of competing ones. The world building, inside her head, is quite good but since I had not connected to the main story, I wasn't as awed as I should have been.

Again, a great elevator pitch: Goosebumps is a movie about the writer of the famous children's horror book series. Yes, a movie about the writer but the twist is that he wrote the books to contain the horrors within. Annoying teen boy comes along, releases said horrors and hijinx abound.

Jack Black plays the author RL Stine, who is hiding in plain sight in Delaware. Nobody really knows what he looks like so he gets away with being weird and cranky. Until horny teenage boy Zach meets his housebound daughter and becomes enamoured. Zach thinks dad is not just weird but abusive and breaks into the house to release Hannah, but instead releases a yeti from a book. The ink is magic and contains the monsters that RL Stine wrote into existence. Then another monsters is released, and then.... them all.

It could have been a great movie if it either contained itself to a few monsters being released or had really accepted that ALL of them had been released. We only ever get to see a few, even though a horde of varied monsters is literally rampaging all over town. For some reason, there are very few casualties. I know I know, kids movie.

The movie is very forgettable, almost to the point that I have no idea how the re-contain the monsters went about. It wants to be the Gremlins of our age but really just feels like an overblown Scooby Doo episode. The best bit of the entire movie is music teacher Jack, played by the real RL Stine, walking by in the background.

Speaking of forgettable, I am the audience for those genre blog posts that promote the new Straight To movies and want their audience to be as excited as they are, but really are probably just paid-for promotional posts. Sometimes, and just sometimes, a really good underground indie genre movie only ever finds its way out via the Straight To market. But most often, it's just a very meh movie. Air and and  400 Days are two such very meh examples. Yes, word of the month. Been a long but not very committed winter.

Air is a bunker movie staring Norman Reedus, still looking and acting exactly like Daryl minus the biker vest and crossbow, and Djimon Hounsou. Holy shit, I spelled his name correctly without seeing it spelled out 5 minutes before. They are two guys doing the maintenance run in a longrun cryo bunker. Something happened to the world and everyone important is underground in cryo stasis. Every 6 months the maintenance guys wake up, check in with everyone else (via 1980s bad terminal computers), make sure everything is working as it should be and then go back to sleep themselves.  When the air up top finally cleans up, they will wake up the sleepers and repopulate the planet.

This time they fuck up. One of their own sleep tanks is burned in an accidental fire. This is the climax of some paranoid tension between the two guys and leads them to violent odds against each other. As a bunker movie, the key stress should be about what it is like up above. But this movie wants it to be between them.

A well done movie with a great script would have us on edge, dialling into the frustration and impotence these two men feel. Conversations would be tense, tight and have us choosing one side or the other. An average movie has us disliking both of them and not really care what is going on. Hounsou shows some potential but Reedus has slipped into the type casting of his most famous character, which leads me to believe he knows this, and will be be meeting Lucille very soon. If you don't watch The Walking Dead, you won't know what that means.

400 Days is just another wonky bunker movie that is weird for weird's sake. Seriously, the premise is pretty decent, as a crew is locked up under the idea of testing long term isolation for a future spaceflight by some Space X style venture. Brandon Routh, Caty Lotz, Ben Feldman and Dane Cook are the crew.  What? Dane Cook? Yes, a serious tense movie starring Dane Cook. They should have stuck to casting people from Arrow and The Flash.

Initially its all well setup, well played out. The bunker doesn't look much like a spaceship but they play it out like they are in one. They are supposed to ignore all outside interaction, but for delayed communications, as if they were really on a 400 day deep space journey. There is the usual tension, sexual and otherwise, as there is only one woman. Testosterone, loneliness and duty to the mission are the key elements of tension. Expected. Well done.

And the someone bangs on the hatch.  And then they have to go outside. That is when it just goes wackadoodle, which would have been fine if they had hinted at some sort of explanation to the strange situation into which the crew is thrust. Present ideas, ask questions, formulate conclusions. But nope, just more wackadoodle on top of more oddness with no explanation or resolution. Its like they just gave up on the story and went with weirdness. Totally pissed me off as it contributed nothing. Still makes me grumpy.