Showing posts sorted by relevance for query neeson. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query neeson. Sort by date Show all posts

Saturday, July 12, 2014

3 Short Paragraphs: Non-Stop

2014, Jaume Collet-Serra (Unknown) -- download

Liam Neeson has successfully been moulded into an aging action star. Not the campy kind that will be in The Expendables 4, but as a man of action pressed into situations he would probably leave to younger men, given the chance. History, age, some wisdom and a great amount of tiredness is often coupled with these roles. Even though this one was a toss away, not very logical nor intriguing, Neeson plays the role well. So, I enjoyed it.  If Ebert could show unabashed love of movies where girls he thought were cute played good roles, I can enjoy my admiration for aging with some amount of grace and action.  Especially considering my personal focus on aging without any of those. I am pretty sure I said, "I'm old !" about 34 times my other night at Thirsty & Miserable. I am not that old. But I feel that old.

Neeson is Bill Marks, a US air marshall, a drunk and an ex-cop, with less than glamorous reasons behind that. He does the NY to London flight. Early into the flight he receives a SMS message on his secure networked phone that people will begin to die unless the airline drops $150 million into an account, which turns out to be in Marks' name. Of course, only Marks finds it odd that he would hijack a plane, not tell anyone he is doing so, while doing his best to find out who the real culprit is. The messages come to him, Sherlock style, us seeing them floating beside the phone, so graphically well done. I love that particular depiction of smart phone usage in today's films. Anywayz, its not exactly a who-dunnit, but a who's-doing-it, tossing us around from suspect to suspect. I am not as good at these, as I used to, often falling into the fake-out trap they now seed these movies with.

So, in case you are worried, yes I will SPOILER the culprit --- it isn't Marks. <insert dramatic bwoooong>  The not very good thriller leads us to two bad guys who want the freaky security of the US to become even more freaky and they believe framing an air marshall will do that. Meanwhile he has shot people, beat up people, been suspected himself and discovered a bomb. The point was everyone dying, with Marks painted as the Bad Guy by the media. People help him, people suspect him and it all rolls to a crash landing in London with only a few deaths and Marks the hero. Oh, and Lupito Nyong'o is wasted, or as I more suspect, given more (wasted) scenes because of her growing popularity at the time of the movie's release -- they should have made her the lead air steward or just left her in the background.  This will not go into my list of favourite Neeson movies, but I did enjoy the way Collet-Serra shot the movie and Neeson was still a top-notch old guy, as I might be. There is still time!

Sunday, March 20, 2016

I Saw This!! It's a Crime!!

I Saw This (double exclamation point) is our all-too regular feature wherein Graig or David attempt to write about a bunch of movies they watched some time ago and meant to write about but just never got around to doing so. Now they they have to strain to say anything meaningful lest they just not say anything at all. And they can't do that, can they?

The Return of the Original Paragraph.

Run All Night, 2015, Jaume Collet-Serra (The Orphan) -- download
The Drop, 2014, Michaël R. Roskam (Bullhead) -- Netflix
Seven Psychopaths, 2012, Martin McDonagh (In Bruges) -- Netflix
Red Eye, 2005, Wes Craven (Swamp Thing) -- Netflix

I consider Run All Night the spiritual sequel to Liam Neeson's A Walk Among the Tombstones. In the latter Neeson is an ex-cop investigating crime, in the former, an ex-enforcer for the mob. Again with Neeson and the capable violence. Again with the aging Liam Neeson not comfortable with his former lives.

Jimmy Conlon worked for Shawn Maguire, head of a waning Irish mob in NYC. Jimmy's son is Joel Kinnamen, still looking for a great role since The Killing, but always putting in quality work.  Mike (Kinnamen) hates Jimmy but a plot intervention, that could have been the elevator pitch for John Wick, has Mike witnessing Shawn's son in a drug deal gone wrong and being forced to kill the son. Now Shawn wants Mike dead and Jimmy has to protect him.

The best bits are between Shawn (Ed Harris) and Jimmy, two old gangsters who genuinely care for each other but cannot doff the responsibilities they have. Shawn's son was an idiot but Shawn has to avenge him. Jimmy has no real connection to his son, but has to protect him. So, Jimmy and Mike run all night chased by gangsters and dirty cops and a weirdly placed Common as a quiet hitman, who seems to be making a guest appearance in this movie.

The Drop brings Tom Hardy into yet another weird role which he pulls on like an old sweater, it completely enveloping him. Accent, mannerisms, look -- all change again, as Hardy plays Bob a mild mannered bartender in Brooklyn, used as a drop for the mob. Drop bars collect money for the mob and occasionally they become the center of BIG drops, tons of dirty money that no petty crook in his right mind would rob. But if they didn't, we wouldn't have a movie.

Hardy plays Bob not just as mild mannered, but somewhere along the spectrum. So meek, he puts up with shit from everyone and is laughed at for it. But from scene one, we know there is something behind those eyes that are always glancing left or at the ground, mumbling his responses. He won't get involved in cousin Marv's (James Gandolphini) scheme to rob his own bar and he is extremely hesitant to take care of an abused pit bull puppy he finds in the trash. But everyone else's machinations force Bob to come into his own.

This is a well crafted crime thriller on the slow side of things. But intentionally and, remember, Hardy was able to pull off a movie that was solely contained in a car -- he can do slow, and do it well. And I really liked seeing him play off Noomi Rapace, much more than I did in Dead Man Down. But oddly, the characters are interchangeable. Not sure who decided she will ever play the abused woman hiding from society. Next to Bob, Noomi's Nadia is ebullient. And Bob likes the puppy, so he gets my smile.

In Bruges was one my favourite movies that I can remember very little of. I was looking forward to  the next by McDonagh and have no idea why it took this long for me to sidle over to it. Like the former, Seven Psychopaths is a comedic romp around crime. Colin Farrell is back, this time as a screenwriter trying to find his next piece. Cliches abound in his character, from blank pages to a single success before this wall, to being a drunk. His best friend, the off Sam Rockwell is that friend, the one you don't know why you stick with, because he keeps on fucking up your life. This time it starts with him trying to insert his own character into Farrell's script, which happens to be Seven Psychopaths. And thus begins quite the meta movie.

Its funny, well scripted and has a ton of solid B-movie people like Tom Waits, Woody Harrelson and Christopher Walken. But like the other, I doubt I will remember it much beyond the writing of this segment.

What? This average crime thriller from 2005 was directed by Wes Craven? Weird. And no, its not a thriller pretending to be a horror. Its just an average, decently presented thriller about a terrorist who ropes a pretty young hotel manager into his plot. Rachel McAdams is the pretty, young thing playing off Cillian Murphy (as Jackson Rippner; now ain't THAT a handle). The funny thing is that she is too good for such a throw away role, so the character is not just a pretty young thing, and ends up turning the tables on Murphy.

But still, the movie barely rates one paragraph. And how did 2005 get so... dated looking? Seriously, I was starting to get offended by the 1990s looking like the ancient past, but now only 10 years ago looks like my childhood?  Urgh. Getting old can mess with your perception, especially as you get older. No, that is not pithy. In 2005, 1995 just looked like it was around the bend. But in 2015, the year 2005 looks positively ancient. I believe its more a product of my mind aging.

See what I did there?

Monday, June 27, 2022

3 Short Paragraphs: Memory

2022, Martin Campbell (Casino Royale) -- download

I need a proper tag for "Liam Neeson as aging ____" movies. Considering the number of times I have mentioned this says a lot -- well, either says a lot about his type-casting, or me being prone to repeating myself. The weird aspect of this movie is that the tag is also the advertised plot of the movie, but in reality, its barely a subplot. I get that Neeson is phoning-in these movies, probably just collecting as many paychecks as he can before he's relegated to just playing the Stationary Old Guy, but WTF is the director of Casino Royale doing such an amateur job, that I assumed this was just some C-grade director assigned to adapt the popular Belgian flick De zaak Alzheimer, about a hitman with Alzeimer's.

Like all adaptations, the core of the movie is there. Neeson is Alex Lewis, a hit man for organized crime out of Mexico. He has Alzheimer's. He's on medication but still losing details, and he wants out. But, as always, one last job: take out a wealthy man and recover some info, but also kill Beatriz, the 13 year old daughter of a sex trafficker recently killed while being taken into custody; she knows things about the world her father forced her into. Alex refuses, and that causes things to spin out for him. The thing is that after that initial setup, the movie really stops being focused on him as the Aging Hitman struggling with Alzheimer's and mainly follows rogue FBI Special Agent Serra (Guy Pearce, Memento), as he struggles to uncover the child trafficking ring based out of the illegal immigrant detention areas built by the wealthy man Lewis was sent to kill. 

As the movie continues, the ties between the two plots are there, but the main character relegated to the background, doing his best to remember who he has to kill, and assist Serra with justice for the girl. Much of the movie seems so utterly phoned-in, it can only be something assigned to Neeson & Campbell by those purple suits that haunt the periphery of my film viewing. The supporting cast is ironically barely memorable, and the use of Pearce and Monica Belluci (Spectre), as the Bad Guy, is just utterly wasted. 

Saturday, September 30, 2023

3 Short Paragraphs (Or Not): Retribution

2023,  Nimród Antal (Predators) -- download

I honestly expected I would have a few posts of movies with Antal, lumping him into the category of "European directors provided the occasional Hollywood flick because they made a name for themselves", but, really, Predators was the only one I wrote about. But I do recall seeing and really enjoying 2003's Kontroll which means here, in Toronto, so likely Toronto After Dark or TIFF ? Also, he has done more in Hollywood than he ever did when he moved to Hungary to build a film career, actually have been born in California.

Anywayz. Another Liam Neeson as aging ____ movie (never really did the tag) and I still think they are being muddy with his supposed age in these movies. Neeson is 71. In the movie, he has two teenage kids and worked as a financier for his German company for 18 years. That would have made him 53 before he started working there and had the kids. I shouldn't be ageist, as it is possible to start a life in your mid-fifties, but ... likely? Let's just chalk it up for my own age and identity issues.

Anywayz. Matt Turner (Liam Neeson, The Ice Road) is a financier who very quickly is portrayed as a bit shady, a bit manipulative and is used by his CEO Anders Muller (Matthew Modine, Stranger Things) to get clients to do as is needed. And there is tension in his family. On his way driving his kids to school, something he never does, he is contacted via a planted mobile phone and alerted there is a bomb under his seat. If he stops driving, calls the cops or gets out of the car, it will blow up. To confirm the authenticity of his claims, the masked voice on the other end of the phone blows up one of Turner's colleagues in front of him, which also frames Matt as the bomber. The masked voice wants money, because of course he does, from a hidden slush fund that Matt and Muller have hidden away in Dubai.

The movie is typical cat & mouse, misdirection and chase scenes. Neeson is, of course, very capable as the man trying to wrest back control of a terrible situation and very believable as the fearful dad. The rest is just the usual playbook of these movies, which is not inherently bad, for I did enjoy watching it, as I almost always do, but I wouldn't have complained about a bit more meat to the story.

Thursday, January 21, 2021

3 Short Paragraphs: Honest Thief

 2020, Mark Williams (A Family Man) -- download

That Liam Neeson plays a man with a particular set of skills is going beyond SNL skits and cliches these days, and I expect at least one of these actioner thriller flicks to come out every year. I really like Neeson, so I eventually get around to seeing them, and for a while I was just enjoying the idea of seeing a man older than me play the centre of action. But, dude, despite the dyed hair, your age is showing through. Men of a particular age, who might not be as active as they should be, should not be running around, doing fight scenes, running, diving, etc. especially when it shows.

Neeson plays Tom Dolan, a man who successfully robbed a bunch of banks, but eventually stopped for personal reasons. He bumps into Annie (Kate Walsh, The Umbrella Academy) at a storage business, and they begin a relationship. As their relationship progresses, and Tom asks her to move in with him, he decides he has to come clean, both to her and to the authorities. He calls the FBI and asks to turn himself in, given that he returns ALL the money, and gets a reduced sentence. Why did he steal all the money if he didn't spend it? He was upset at the banking industry, and wanted to teach them a lesson. Once he cleanly got away with one, he just kept on doing it because it made him feel alive. But now that Annie was in his life, that was enough. Alas, some corrupt FBI agents decide to steal the money from him, and as they fall deeper into their choice, they shoot one of their own, but framing Tom for it, of course. Tom has to clear his name, keep Annie safe, and still end up where he originally wanted to.

This is a by the numbers crime thriller, doing nothing special but still satisfying for giving you exactly what you expected. Neeson is charismatic in his stoicism, something that always separated him from the Growly Old Guy aspects of other aging thriller/action stars, like Eastwood or Gibson. Even if you can see his aching bones & joints show through in a few scenes, he still carries off the role decently. Jai Courtney, Anthony Ramos, Jeffrey Donovan and Robert Patrick are all along for the ride as the FBI agents, good and bad. I watch these movies for the same reasons I watch procedurals on TV, in that the give me a good dose of distraction, and I find comfort in the formula. Of course, I always revel when I see something that is a measure above the norm, not that I often find it, but I am fine if they are entirely, yell at the screen, stupid.

Friday, January 17, 2025

3 Short Paragraphs (Or Not): Absolution

2024, Hans Petter Moland (Cold Pursuit) -- download

I went into this to see another "Liam Neeson as aging ______" (no tag) and, yes, it is that, but it was also something .... more. Not perfectly so, but it at least had the conceit of trying to be more than just its premise, which is, "said aging thug discovers he has ill and will see his memory & functionality drastically fade in less than three years." This is not the first time Neeson has played a version of this character (not literally, but a man of violence with memory issues), but this time, its not as slick, which lent itself to credibility for me. 

Neeson's "Thug" (Liam Neeson, Derry Girls) doesn't even get a name, and he is called just that in the credits, and apparently that was also the original name for the movie. He works for the Conners, one of those low rent gangsters that eke out an existence doing work for other more connected criminal organizations. As we see them, there is just Charlie (Ron Perlman, Poker Face), his son Kyle (Daniel Diemer, Under the Bridge), and Thug, who spends most of his days walking around collecting protection money from business owners who treat him as much as one of the neighbourhood, as anything. He's tough but you can see that he's losing it, forgetting basic things like his boss's name and where he lives. And after seeing specialist, where he learns he has CTE for years of head injuries, he decides to reconnect with his estranged daughter.

Thug is not a good man. He knows he comes from a legacy of angry, abusive men and while he regrets what he let himself become, he also doesn't really try to change it. But his clock is ticking so he takes the gun out of his mouth and does the work to reestablish a relationship with Daisy (Frankie Shaw, SMILF), his daughter, and his grandson. Her life hasn't been much better than his, but everyone seems to be looking for connection no matter how tenuous. This isn't a movie of grand gestures and emotional awareness, but it gets the job done.

Memory loss is all around me these days, as I age, as parents age even more. I see myself going from the guy who could remember the face and name, instantly, of someone he met 20 years ago to doing the "you know, that guy in that movie that came out last year...". Sure, the stress of the past decade has lent itself to that, and its expected to diminish somewhat as you age, but .... it frightens me. I have never been the most lucid guy to begin with, prone to letting my brain go down rabbit holes, staring into space, losing time, but the idea of losing entireties of myself is ... terrifying.

There is now one more "aging hit man" movie to watch, "Knox Goes Away", on Amazon, with Michael Keaton.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

3 Short Paragraphs: A Walk Among the Tombstones

2014, Scott Frank (writer The Wolverine, Get Shorty) -- netflix

Will Liam Neeson ever step out from the shadow of Taken? Does he even care to? He's 63 this year, so the idea of playing as many action star type roles is probably appealing, before he is relegated to only the Old Man roles. Since becoming the guy with a specific set of skills, people accept him as the quiet, stable man capable of great violence, and that lends itself to crime fiction. This one, based on the novel by Lawrence Block, is the kind of middle of the road work, more an enhanced TV episode than striking motion picture, but it was solid and I enjoyed it.

Scudder is an ex-cop from the 90s, with the short trench and goatee back then, ex because he was involved in the shooting of three would-be armed robbers who shot the owner of his favourite bar. He was drunk at the time, angry in his retribution and careless in his response. He is now a recovering alcoholic working the unlicensed private eye job, doing jobs for people, looking much as we just plain Neeson. That day long ago haunts him, but not for the reasons we think.

The snapshot on one instant of his life, that we have as the plot of the movie, is where he is approached by a local drug lord whose wife has been kidnapped. The drug lord cannot go to the cops, of course.  Scudder rejects his request but changes his mind when the drug lord explains the full story; that his wife is already dead; the ransom paid but they killed and dismembered her anyway. What follows is a classic crime investigation of the seedy underbelly, well The Seedy Underbelly,  because that is where these stories always occur. But Neeson is give more here, more to chew on, more to present to us, more to think about, as he investigates the serial kidnappings & killings and makes decisions about who he is working for, why and who he is up against. Its an unremarkable movie but I rather recommend it. In much the way I am happy to see actors acting, in all range of movies, I am happy to see a decently movie created, for a director has to direct, even if it isn't Oscar worthy, as long as they do it with heart and concerted effort.

Friday, June 4, 2021

3 Short Paragraphs: The Marksman

 2021, Robert Lorenz (Trouble with the Curve) -- download

Pretty much all my recent posts about Liam Neeson movies bring up that he is being relegated to the aging action star mould. Or I should be clearer, all the Liam Neeson movies that I watch. But this is the first one where it is obvious that his age has caught up with him. There is no denying Neeson's Jim is past his prime. He's a widowed rancher, ex-marine in Texas, right on the border, losing his ranch to the bank and dealing constantly with Mexican illegals crossing his land. In the land of Right vs Left, Jim is likely a Republican, but not the amoral image the internet creates of them. When he is presented with a situation where an illegal and her son need his assistance, he provides it.

This is an odd movie. It positions itself from the common American trope, in that Good Men stand up and do what is right. The same trope usually involves violence. The movie is called The Marksman but that has so little to bear on the movie. Sure, Jim is skilled with a rifle, but that's it. Possibly there is a statement that only an armed American can make a difference, but I doubt it. But the strangeness comes in the underlying current of the movie, wherein we see the coming-to-America viewpoint from Mexicans who don't really want to be going there. The boy and his mother cross the border because their life is in danger. The cartel thugs follow them. They are the illegals we are presented with, but neither actually want to be in America. Hard choices forced them across the border.

The boy and his mother cross the border because her brother ran afoul of a cartel. She is killed at the border and begs Jim to take the boy to his family in Chicago. Jim tries to do what the law expects of him, but runs into walls of corruption and indifference. The cartel follows them, as Jim abandons the ranch he was trying to save from the bank and guides the boy to his family. Jim's at the end of his life, the boy is just beginning. Its a morose movie where we don't get a beautiful picture of American through the eyes of an illegal, but tainted views from all sides. I saw the boy not seeing much difference between where he had been raised and the rural views of America, meanwhile the cartel men pondered the decadence of the strip malls and free-flowing money they would likely never have access to, without resorting to the violence that brought them to America. Odd movie, that while the underlying current was as above, most of it was just standard, boring chase fare.

Thursday, March 10, 2022

n Ranty Paragraphs: Blacklight

2022, Mark Williams (Honest Thief) -- download

Blah blah blah, I watch a lot of Neeson movies where he is an "aging ____" who gets wrapped up in something blah blah blah. Sure, Williams did a moderately successful directing job of one of these (Honest Thief) and produced a few more of similar ilk, but dude, WTF was this ? Like, seriously, this was "my grandmother yelling at the TV screen" stupid. And that's even ignoring the fact that Neeson is beyond pushing himself to represent the aging skilled violent man who looks like he is going to throw his back out just jogging up the sidewalk. Not that I know anyone who is in THAT bad of shape.

*cough*

OK, premise. Neeson's Travis Block is a fixer for the FBI. For most of the movie I assumed he was an actual FBI agent, just doing the less than legal work for his boss FBI director Robinson (Aidan Quinn, Elementary), but in the third act, it is revealed for the past 40 or so years, he has just been ... doing the dirty work under the table. I wonder what the line item in the budget was for that. His primary role seems to be extracting deep cover FBI agents who are in trouble, and in doing his latest job, he discovers from one such FBI agent, that deeper, darker things may be going on. Said agent Dusty (Taylor John Smith, Shadow in the Cloud) is trying to make contact with a fledgling journalist Mira Jones (Emmy Raver-Lampman, Umbrella Academy) when he is killed by goons we know were hired by Robinson. Now Block is invested in finding out what is really going on.

The thing is that it takes almost half the movie to get to this point. We spend FAR too much of the movie dealing with Block and his OCD and the strained relationship with his daughter and granddaughter, and in introducing Jones and her strained relationship in becoming a proper respected journalist. In most movies these brief dramatic notes would be introduced just to give the main character motivation to leave his dark life, only to realize he cannot. But this shit ain't brief. And it cannot even be chalked up to character building, as only the most obvious uses of this background is even used. It could have all been covered in fifteen minutes.

Another thing. Block is sent to stop Dusty from making contact with Jones, and in response Dusty jumps into a garbage truck and destroys half of downtown Washington DC because ... I don't fucking know why. Because some stupid producer decided the movie needed a destructive chase scene? It just made no fucking sense whatsoever. 

Eventually, after Dusty is killed, and another reporter is killed for stealing Jones' story, a story that they don't have any real facts to back up yet, Block decides to take on his friend and boss. Sure, these movies always have the "confront the bad guy" scene, but in this case Block actually seemed to think that by yelling at his friend to "do the right thing" it would actually accomplish the goal! In response, Robinson unsuccessfully tries to have Block killed, and successfully disappears Block's family. Not nasty, shot and dumped in a hole, which he basically threatened to do, but just sends them into witness protection in about ... 4 hours? Seriously, he deletes their entire lives in less than a day, without anyone catching on that something weird is happening.

How will Block reveal that the FBI are involved in a nefarious plot that has them killing American citizens for the Greater Good? Steal a harddrive that has everything ever done laid out. They might as well labeled it "Evidence to Incriminate Me". Oh, that and he grabs Robinson and drives recklessly, scaring him into confessing to the public. Yup, one nerve wracking drive in the back on an SUV and the movie fucking is ... over !! I was pausing to see if there was another 20 minutes or so to go, so they could have some back-tracking and further violent actions, anything to actually influence Robinson to confess, but nope, "bad driving, me scared, stop, me confess!" Movie over, day is saved.

Oh, and family in witness protection, having their entire lives uprooted and pretty much destroyed? Happy Day, we are reunited with Grampa Block whose paranoia has been ruining their lives for ages, but he saved the day, so all is forgiven!

So, one last OMG thing. Marmy pointed this out to me, as Block was experiencing a bit more of his paranoid OCD, they were doing the dramatic "echo echo echo" thing used ... in the 70s ... to depict a fracturing mind? Well, they pretty much did this scene.

Finally, why was the movie called Blacklight?

Saturday, April 21, 2018

Breaking Hiatus: The Commuter

2018, Jaume Collet-Serra (Run All Night) -- download

The other day, I was thinking I want to get back into writing about movies; again not explicitly reviewing movies, but returning to whatever I was doing here. Then, the other morning, Jason K blogged about blogging and THAT was what I wanted to return to. But no, I cannot resurrect thisboyistoast.nu again, as I already did (as a photoblog) and it is already on hiatus itself. BUT, I can return to blogging about movies, as I watch them, with no requirement of format or length or requirement.

That should make it easier, right? So says my lazy lizard brain.

The Commuter is the latest Liam Neeson movie from French director Jaume Collet-Serra. Without trying to, I have seen all of his movies, so I guess that puts him in my wheelhouse. My favourites were The Shallows and Run All Night. But including this new one, his three Neeson movies are of a certain style, where a man is forced by plot circumstances to become involved in something more violent than he ever intended.

This movie begins with a commentary on aging, particularly the aging action star, that cannot be anything but intentional. Michael MacCauley 62, laid off from his insurance job after 10 faithful years. That means he started that job at 52, and hoped to ride it out till retirement. He had his kids in his mid 40s, and chose a life commuting to and from the suburbs over whatever he was doing before. In a great opening sequence, we are given a collage of what makes the title of the movie, his commute to NYC and back each day on a crowded train where he is one of the regulars.

On the day he is laid off, he has had a few beers with an old friend, and we find out MacCauley is an ex-cop. He is returning to his home, where he will have to tell his wife (and their college age kids) that life is about to collapse. But he is approached by a lovely young woman (Vera Farmiga) with an offer. Use his cop skills to find someone on the train who doesn't belong, tag them, and make $100k.

Of course, its never that simple. Things escalate towards a conspiracy of murder and corruption and a desire to kill the person he is supposed to tag. But he is a man of principle and does his best to derail their plan. Despite the danger to himself and his family, he has to do what is right.

Its fun to watch Neeson in the gray years of his life play the leading action hero, but not in the cocky, shout into the future way that someone like Bruce Willis or Sylvester Stallone does. Liam bears his age well, but it shows on him. The visceral fight scenes have him pummeled and bounced about in a dance of violence, where it is not his strength that wins, but wisdom (skill learned through time) and willpower winning out. While the movie does do a bit of spiraling out into ridiculous (big action needs big sequences), I cannot help but like the movie.

The finale shows an interest in making this movie into a series. Not Taken style where he repeats the same plot over and over, but one where an aged cop foils the plots of the bad guys. I doubt it will go that way, but its fun to think of such while Liam is around to foster it.

Sunday, September 26, 2021

3 Short Paragraphs: The Ice Road

2021, Jonathan Hensleigh (Kill the Irishman) -- download/Netflix

Yep, Ice Road Truckers the movie. Liam Neeson (Rob Roy) returns as yet another aging man in a difficult situation who rises to the call. Mike McCann is a long distance trucker in North Dakota who loses yet another job, because his brother Gurty, beset with PTSD and verbal aphasia, draws the ire of fellow truckers, and Mike responds with fists. We are supposed to think of Gurty as mentally challenged, but the underlying plot of challenges with his recovery and the American veteran system is muddy at best. With nothing left, Mike takes a call to join a convoy on a dangerous but critical trip to northern Manitoba, to deliver equipment that will be used to rescue miners trapped under a collapse. The clock is ticking and the truckers will be forced over the Spring thawing ice roads.

That Mike can drive from North Dakota into Manitoba to take a job is weird -- does the idea of cross border truckers just exist? Either way, they know its going to be dangerous but the insurance company is going to shell out $200k to be split between Mike, his brother (trip mechanic), a young woman named Tantoo (whose brother is one of the trapped miners; Amber Midthunder, Legion) and the leader, Jim Goldenrod (Lawrence Fishburne, Hannibal). And a company actuary joins to monitor the trip. Weird flex, but OK. But, twist! Twist because just the excitement and danger of traveling the ice road is definitely not enough, despite there being an entire TV series dedicated to it. No, there is nefarious intent at work here, and the actuary is actually an Evil Thug sent along to make sure things go wrong. Evil Mine Executives have cut corners and caused the collapse, but if nobody is rescued, it will all be washed away in the tragedy. 

This was straight-up straight-to-tape level action and intrigue with melodramatic action and overtly melodramatic deaths, especially with the quick death of Goldenrod, but I guess that is the point of Big Names taking terrible roles, in that they can get in and get out quick with their money. The rest of the movie, once Jim dies, is about getting to the mine on time, despite Evil Thugs and his Mooks and lost trucks and constant danger, but not from the ice so much. Everyone puts in their best tense faces and shouts in anger, but even Neeson is just along for the ride. This was not a good movie.

P.S. I love how terrible that poster is, Neeson with a gun, implying he is once again the man with a particular set of skills, which he is, its just that they are Driving a Truck, not shooting a gun.

Friday, April 27, 2012

3 Short Paragraphs: The Grey

2011, Joe Carnahan (Smokin' Aces, The A-Team) --- download

Once again I bring up that I like small focused movies and present this as an example.  The premise is just that -- small and focused, where we have a small group of survivors deciding to walk out of their air crash predicament and are hounded by hungry wolves the entire way.  That is it, just the walking and surviving.  And of course, the weather, the grey bleak northern clime that gives the movie its name. 

Liam Neeson does these movies so well, wrapping himself up in a character whose emotional landscape is also the reason for the movie's title. He is a man at the end of his life, at the end of the world, in a drilling camp somewhere we assume must be northern Alaska but would have been better suited if set in remote Nunavut.  He has lost someone, someone he loved and cannot live without. But his suicide is interrupted by his job in the camp, the defense of the men, against wolves. These are not the fuzzy, wuzzy wolves we have been raised with, those that are more afraid of men than they are a danger.  These are the Big Bad Wolves of German forests who eat people and carry an evil, cunning with them. The interruption gives him a reprieve and sits him on a plane flying south, taking the hard, dangerous and angry men who work the camp. But then the plane crashes and these men find out exactly how not hard they are.

The ensuing walking battle between the survivors of the plane crash and the huge dark, mostly CGI wolves is not remotely realistic.  These are monsters, not pack running mammals of the Canadian wood.  Their growls echo loudly in the hills, even more haunting than their howls.  Their attacks are timed with deadly precision, more cunning than the men can conceive.  But Neeson's Ottway knows these wolves, fearing and respecting them where the others walking with him are just set dressing, showing just how little mankind controls this wilderness. They are loud, violent and despairing fools given only the role to die under teeth and claws.  Only Ottway is destined to survive, a man who defies his own desire to die not so much that he wants to live but for the simple fact he has been given a choice of how he will die, repeatedly quoting his father's poem, "Once more into the fray. Into the last good fight I'll ever know. Live and die on this day. Live and die on this day."

Thursday, December 24, 2015

ReWatch: Love Actually

2003, Richard Curtis (Notting Hill) -- download

Damn, it left Netflix.

So, this has become a tradition without it becoming a thing. The rewatch of Love Actually. And I have to retract my previous statement of it not being a Christmas movie; it definitely is, as the whole "countdown weeks to Christmas" thing comes up prominently on the screen as all the stories progress.

If you don't know, the movie is an ensemble cast of characters in London with subtle connections between friends, family and coworkers showing up as they tell the tale of loves. What I love (*ahem*) about it, is that it is not just Good Love, but All Love. It's not just about things always working out for the best. Laura Linney's Sarah and underwear model (really, that's what he looks like) Karl never do get together. And Alan Rickman & Emma Thompson go through an encounter that their relationship will probably never recover from.

Laura Linney has only been working for Alan Rickman for 2 years and they are great friends, smacking each other and having true heart to hearts. He must be a nice guy which makes his downfall all the more tragic. And yes, he does sleep with his secretary -- the screen editor (and Curtis's wife) recently confirmed that.  Pig. Marmy was right all these years.

P.S. Said Screen editor, Emma Freud's live tweets of the show, are great fun.

The Prime Minister fancies Natalie right away. I get it, it is supposed to be very obvious but it shocks me every time. His sister's comment (Emma Thompson) later on makes these earlier scenes make sense, "20 years ago you would have been his exact type." But in that relationship, he may be the Prime Minister but she has all the power and confidence.

Billy Bob is quite the convincing American asshole.

The relationship between Emma Thompson and Liam Neeson (a grieving recent widower) is great; so raw and close. Friends who mock each other and can still be supportive while being brutally honest. And so is the connection between Neeson and his step-son. Obviously, both of them have been preparing for Sam's mother's death for many years but the two share each other's company of grief very well. That they have Sam's crush to distract them is very sweet.

Bill Nighy is always playing such distinguished gentlemen, he must have had a ball playing the washed up, sleazy rock star. And I am pretty sure that is Laura Vandervoort from Bitten playing one of the background singers; though maybe not, as Vandervoort has always been far more skinny than that singer.

Rick Grimes is not as scary in this movie.  Bing bing Keira, it takes you long enough. I would expect her husband to be dense and unaware of the whole attraction thing, but she should have caught on pretty quickly.  BTW, Keira Knightley is 18 in this movie. And she is marrying Chiwetel Ejiofor, who is 26. Where are her irate parents? Lynden David Hall is the singer at their wedding, and yes, we are supposed to know who he is -- Britishism.

Final thoughts on this round is that I still wish the Colin Frissell story in that Milwaukee bar had all been a dream. Its far too silly when compared to the rest of the movie and was probably only inserted to give all the boyfriends, who attended the movie as a favour to their girlfriends, something to chuckle at.

My least favourite stories should be apparent with Colin Firth's Uncle Jamie and his crush on his maid followed by the very cute porn movie stand-ins, starring the not yet famous Martin Freeman. And yes, its a porn movie, not just a movie with sex scenes. I still think his funny walk at the end of the movie (their first kiss) is a boner walk, after him having maintained decorum during all their previous interactions.

Monday, December 14, 2020

3 Short Paragraphs: Cold Pursuit

2019, Hans Petter Moland (In Order of Disappearance) -- Amazon

I swore the original was also called Cold Pursuit, but apparently not. Hans Petter Moland returns to (re)direct the American version of his own movie from Norway. Based on the trailer, I can see that he pretty much just re-did his original movie (with Stellan Skarsgård), shot for shot, transplanting it to Kehoe, a ski resort town in Colorado, while retaining the otherworldly snowbound look of the original. I will have to go back to Amazon and find the original, as I know it's there somewhere.

Nels Coxman (Liam Neeson, Love Actually) is a snowplow driver and Kehoe, Citizen of the Year award winner. He and his wife Grace (Laura Dern, Jurassic Park) live in an absolutely lovely little cabin high on a mountain, all alone. Soon after, their son is murdered by drug dealers, but local police just blame a heroin addiction & overdose. Grace leaves Nels, as he won't acknowledge that the two didn't "know" their son. Nels knows his son didn't do drugs, and tracks down the drug dealers who killed him, to take revenge.

This movie has a very Fargo feel to it. It's not comedic per se, more just darkly amusing, as we see how ludicrous the whole revenge plot that spills into a drug gang turf war is. I have a feeling that Skarsgård played a much more reserved man than Neeson, who we are already quite convinced has a particular set of skills that lend to killing drug dealers. But the performances are great, and the visuals are incredible. Just that one scene of Nels riding the snowplow on a main road that is about 12' below the top of the snow, a line of cars slowly following him, was so familiar to snow we had when I was a kid. I just wished that the plot centered more around him, as he felt more like a catalyst to the event, than a main character.

Wednesday, June 14, 2023

3 Short Paragraphs (Or Not): The Mother

2023, Niki Caro (Whale Rider) -- Netflix

What does it say about my personality that I make an effort (and even tag it, you doofus) to watch action movies focused on Women With Guns? I really cannot feel that bad considering there is already an established trope along the same lines. But wherein I usually dislike most of its male oriented genre, I do tend to see most in this category, even the ones I know will be less than stellar. Do they make more of an effort with the female helmed properties? Maybe? Not likely? Or maybe I should stop dissecting it, and just enjoy what I enjoy.

Also, why do you have to start pretty much every WWG post with a dissection of the tag? "Do I?" you ask? Well... click through the above tag and you will see, I don't. So, mnneyyyahhh.

So, directed by Niki Caro from a screenplay (and story) by Misha Green, mostly known as showrunner for Lovecraft Country, the movie tells a typical tale of a retired assassin who is drawn out of her isolation, back to her old, more violent life. But it begins before that, in a safe house where she is being harangued by FBI agents tasked with protecting her. She relates her recent past from military sniper to enforcer for arms dealers, a typical story of a killer who cannot come back to "the real world", but she abandons it all when she finds they are smuggling people as well as guns. Unfortunately her partners find her, kill all the FBI agents (but one), so she has to make her own safety in Alaska. Buuut before that, she has her baby, a baby fathered by one of her violent partners, but she doesn't know which one, and that is important because it doesn't matter; the child is hers not theirs. BUT she cannot take the child into hiding, so they fake its death and she tasks the surviving FBI agent with her child's protection. And then she leaves.

Of note, she makes use of that magical portal that transports people in stolen vehicles from one US border to the next, conveniently bypassing Canada altogether.

Years and years later. The FBI agent protecting the assassin's daughter has discovered evidence that the arms dealers are aware of the daughter, so she comes out of hiding to protect her daughter. Act two ends up with her rescuing the girl from her captors and secreting her away back to Alaska, the one place she now knows she can protect the girl. And then the Bad Guys come for them.

Despite my unbalanced paragraphs, things do happen, interesting things where we get to see Lopez being all badass despite her age. Despite her age. I hate how that has to be a thing because its not at all apparent. She's over 50, and while not in the ageless zone of Tom Cruise, there is no denying her athleticism. Men seem to be allowed to begin their action careers after 50 -- Liam Neeson was mid-50s when he did Taken and that was not yet part of his aging men of violence era. But let's hand wave all this consideration away and just say she does come across as convincing, even as the sociopath her character is meant to be. 

But the crux of the film, that she has no character name, just The Mother, is the female aspect of it ("female aspect of it" ?? CRINGE), one that was intentional, and while not the experience of all women, is something that must be unique to women (which is honestly coming from a male who has no desire to child bearing). If Neeson's Bryan Mills was protecting his daughter because he could, and because he had failed her so often before, The Mother is compelled because of motherhood. Or that is the implication. Whether it be biology or ritual or societal convention, that is what is portrayed in her, the mother lioness that will do anything to protect her young, even die. But was it successful in that depiction? Was it different than any other aging assassin protecting a weaker person? Other than a few teary scenes, I am not sure. Maybe I have to subscribe more to the societal convention to see the weight this movie wants to portray? In the end, I think I just ended up with a middling to lower-middling action thriller to add to The Tag.

Saturday, August 2, 2025

Series Minded: The Nakeds Gun

[Series Minded is an irregular feature here at T&KSD, wherein we tackle the entire run of a film, TV, or videogame series in one fell swoop. This one kind of snuck up on me. I wasn't expecting to re-watch the original Naked Gun trilogy for the new film's debut, but I enjoyed rewatching the first so much I had to watch them all].

The Naked Gun: From the Files of the Police Squad! (1998, d. David Zucker - netflix)
The Naked Gun 2 1/2: The Smell of Fear (1991, d. David Zucker - netflix)  
The Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult (1994, d. Peter Segal - netflix)
The Naked Gun (2025, d. Akiva Schaffer - in theatre)

Parody films used to be so bankable, both as financial successes at the box office and as tremendous sources of big time laffs, chuckles and guffaws (not to mention titters and chortles). But the parody film has become something rather derided in the past decade or two, in no small part thanks to the prolific output of the "Not Another X Movie" series which treated mere reference as comedy and relied on being gross, crass, or punching down on others as their default mode. But even when parodies were in the hands of parody maestros, like Buck Henry, Mel Brooks and the Zucker-Abrams-Zucker trio, The Naked Gun stood apart.

Leslie Nielsen would go on to star in a slew of parody films following The Naked Gun but to greatly diminished returns. They replied upon Nielsen's comedic persona almost entirely, what they lacked was a central character like Detective Frank Drebin that was a defined suit of comedy armour for Nielsen to wear. Of course, Nielsen had debuted the character in the short lived TV series Police Squad! six years earlier, so the character had already been built and tested. 

I had forgotten how central to The Naked Gun comedy engine Frank Drebin is. He's not a buffoon, yet he can be. He's not oblivious, but he often is. He's awful at his job, but also very successful. He's a mix of the hardboiled detective from film noir and the jaded shoot-first, ask-questions-later cop of the Dirty Harry movies. He's a walking talking cliche that constantly defies the cliche. By the nature of the cliche, Drebin is poker-face serious at all times (except when he needs to react to something, at which point Nielsen's comic mugging is rivalled only by the likes of Jim Carrey) and delivers every line like he's chewed on the words for a millennium even though it's clear he hasn't really thought them through at all. 

Drebin is the primary joke delivery vehicle for The Naked Gun series and why it works so well is because the cliche is so well-worn and time tested and reused ad nauseum, that even a thorough lampooning of the character and story tropes do not diminish the effectiveness of the tropes.  With Austin Powers lampooning the Bond cliches so thoroughly, Bond and spy movies had to evolve from the cliches. Detective and police stories didn't budge an inch after The Naked Gun.

The Naked Gun and its first sequel weren't just keen on parody though. They are joke machines, set-up and punchline followed by wordplay followed by background visual gag followed by slapstick followed by callback followed by character-centric joke followed by topical joke followed by surprise cameo followed by fourth wall break followed by political gag followed by pop culture poke followed by innuendo followed by overt sexual joke followed by non-sequitur, inanity, and silliness... all swirling down the same drain intermixing and popping up again.

The big surprise of the series' first cinematic entry, The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!, was not only how damn funny it still remains (even outside of nostalgia and intense familiarity) but how little (if at all) it uses punching down in its comedy.  Likewise it was surprising to me, given that David Zucker fell down a right wing rabbit hole in the 2000s, how snarky and satirically scathing they were of the police, Republicans, and jingoism. At one point in the first film, Drebin is asked to hand in his badge and gun and states "Just think, next time I shoot someone, I could be arrested." 

Plot is kind of besides the point in these films, and yet, at their core the first two films still have a meaningful (if irreverent) caper for Drebin to foil in and an emotional arc for him, centered around his love affair with Jane (Prescilla Presley, who the first film convinced a 12-year-old Kent was the most beautiful woman in the world).

The first Naked Gun has O.J. Simpson's (I know!) Nordberg getting shot up during a drug stakeout at the L.A. docks. This coincides with the impending visit from Queen Elizabeth II. In investigating the shooting Police Squad links the events at the docs with prosperous businessman Vincent Ludwig (Ricardo Montalbán) who happens to be the main host and sponsor of the Queen's visit.  Paying a visit to Ludwig's office, Frank and Jane spark an immediate attraction, and Ludwing sends Jane after Frank to find out what he knows. One safe-sex-joke-that-I-totally-didn't-get-when-I-was-12 and a delightfully silly montage later, they're a steadfast couple. But not so fast... of course Frank quickly suspects that she was using him for Ludwig's benefit so they have a romantic complication to overcome as, during the third act, Frank needs to save the Queen from being assassinated at a baseball game. Though perhaps a big detour from the detective/cop genre the film is lampooning, the baseball sequence finds an insane amount of gags from Frank's impersonation of an opera singer for the national anthem (of which he doesn't fully know the words, but then who really does if we're being honest?), to him impersonating an umpire and getting too into the audience adulation for his positive calls for the home team, to him trying to pat down the players throughout the game to check for guns. All that plus getting to watch O.J. as Nordberg get accidentally abused and tortured over and over and over again is its own kind of schadenfreude.


The second (and a half) film finds the comedy less omnipresent than its predecessor, largely because it's a bit more stuck in its time, yet it still has much the same snap as the first. Frank and Police Squad are in Washington D.C. for a Presidential commendation, which finds Frank interacting with George and Barbara Bush, replete with Frank accidentally delivering all manner of assaults and insults upon poor Barbara over and over again. (The George Bush impersonator is caked in thick make-up to a distracting degree, which, really, you couldn't just nab Dana Carvey?). President Bush announces he's deferring his entire energy policy to one man, Dr. Meinheimer (Richard Griffiths), who it turns out that Jane now works for. Frank and Jane split up before their wedding and Frank is heartbroken. Jane is now with oil baron Quentin Hapsburg (Robert Goulet), who is secretly running a cabal of energy industry leaders, and they're plotting to fix Bush's energy policy by replacing Meinheimer with a double.  Of course Frank gets in the way, in no small part thanks to Jane's connections to it all. One awkward encounter after another, the pair reunite and they have wild night at the pottery turner (if you don't know the Ghost reference it just becomes a delicious bit of absurdity). After a disastrous incident with a tank, Police Squad is no more, but Frank, Ed, Nordberg and the real Dr. Hapsburg infiltrate the state dinner (as a mariachi band no less) where the fake Hapsburg is to present his fake energy policy and stop a nuclear bomb. Hapsburg nearly manages to escape but is interrupted by a beautifully orchestrated callback. 

The (thirty-three and a) third movie moves itself squarely into the 90's. By this point the spoof movie had taken off with National Lampoon and Mel Brooks back in the game quite heavily, so it seems there was a pivot.  Whether it was studio demands or the absence of Jim Abrahms and Jerry Zucker, this third entry in the series leaned in hard on spoofing then-recent (and not-so-recent) cinema, including opening with a parody of the stairs sequence from The Untouchables, riffing on Thelma and Louise, and, strangely, Staying Alive ( but only in the most rudimentary ways).  Not satisfied with in-story (or in-dreams, or in-tangent) parodies, the film's final act takes place at the Academy Awards (the curious roster of celebrity cameos - like "Wierd" Al and Vanna White is very charming) where they have more opportunity to do out-of-story spoofs like "Geriatric Park". Divesting itself of classic detective and cop tropes and going into 90's crime thrillers and prison dramas along with xenophobic, gay panic, rape jokes and transphobia (in the guise of a Crying Game riff) is the series at its absolute lowest, but sequences that play like hack observational comedy (such as Frank's visit to the grocery store or Frank trying to talk to a cabbie) lay the foundation for this weakest entry in the series.

33 1/3 leaves behind the noirish tendencies, savvy wordplay and even the regular running gags to fit into the "movie riffing on other movies" trend that wouldn't subside for another couple decades. It's really disappointing. On top of that, the story doesn't have any character resonance. It opens with with Jane having become a busy lawyer with her biological clock ticking. Frank has retired and is bored. They want a baby but Jane's too busy and Frank's feeling neglected. The "domesticated man" comedy is dated, but Nielsen sells it pretty good. Ed and Nordberg need his help in a case, and he goes undercover at a sperm bank. After Jane discovers Frank is a cop again, she leaves him, so Frank dives headfirst into more undercover work, going into high security prison to befriend freelance bomber Rocco Dillon (Fred Ward). He helps him escape and Jane reenters the picture just as Rocco's girl Tanya (Anna Nicole Smith, who the film convinced 18-year-old Kent was the most beautiful woman in the world) inexplicably makes fresh with him (it must have been something in Nielsen's contract, as she does it again and again in the film). Rocco's plan is to bomb the Academy Awards, and through various shenanigans (some of them actually amusing) Frank stops them.

It's Frank and Jane's relationship in the first two movies that works so well at its core. The smartest thing the second film did was open with them broken up just so it had an excuse to put Jane with yet another foil for Frank and then bring them together again. Here, the break-up feels contrived and doesn't seem to carry a lot of weight on Frank for the remainder of the film. Jane's return to the fold at the end of the second act is handle well enough to bring her back into the picture, but it's just so she can be the damsel in distress again (though pointedly so, if not quite pointedly enough).  There was an opportunity here to establish a formulae for the series itself, with Frank and Jane starting each film broken up again already, and to continue to abuse Nordberg (which this third entry mostly neglects)... but the series would not continue anyway due to diminishing returns... that is until 2025.

This new iteration of The Naked Gun was resurrected by writer/director Akiva Schaffer (of The Lonely Island), co-writers Dan Gregor & Doug Mand, and producers Seth McFarlane and Erica Huggins, and it falls squarely into the "legasequel" terrain. Liam Neeson plays Frank Drebin Jr. while Paul Walter Houser plays the Junior version of George Kennedy's Captain Ed Hocken. Where the Senior Ed was the man in charge of Police Squad in the original series, here both Frank and Ed report into their Chief, played by CCH Pounder.

It's been 30 years since the last Naked Gun film so there's a LOT of cops and detective fiction and non-fiction in the intervening years, and the awareness of police abuses and corruption is much more in the consciousness, so a modern day spoof on the genre has plenty to play with. The film opens with a Christopher Nolan-styled bank robbery sequence that featured prominently in the trailers. Neeson, like Nielsen, is shameless in his comedy guise and had no compunction about doing an action sequences wearing a schoolgirl uniform. Like the original series, this downplays the violence, despite noting how frequently Frank likes to shoot perps (offscreen gun violence is something he shares with his father apparently).

The robbery was a smokescreen for the theft of the P.L.O.T. device, which is handed off to billionaire tech mogul Richard Cane (Danny Huston). His plan is a big modern supervillain grand scheme...to send a signal that will drive the world into a primordial rage, while all the rich shits go live in a secret volcano bunker with "Weird" Al and wait out humanity's self destruction.

As a result of his egregious abuse of his police powers, Frank is booted off the robbery case, and onto investigating an auto wreck. The victim's sister, Beth Davenport (Pamela Anderson, which this film reminded me that 14-year-old Kent was convinced she was the most beautiful woman in the world) advises Frank her brother worked for Cane and so the storylines dovetail. Unlike Frank Sr. and Jane, their flirtation is filled with more disdain than attraction, which softens slightly with each subsequent encounter. Beth is much more a woman of action...as a true crime author (based on stories she's made up) she figures she can follow the cliched path of investigating her brother's death and exact her revenge. Only Frank Jr. stands in her way. Unlike its predecessor, and in modern action movie fashion, Frank fails to stop the evil plan, and then has to deal with the fallout. I never could have predicted where it would go, not in a mil...not in a doz... not in, say, seven guesses.

The film is loaded with sight gags, non-sequiturs, wordplay, etc... all the hallmarks of a Naked Gun movie, and its approach to parody is more in line with the first film of the original trilogy, rather than the third. Shaffer opts for stylistic parody rather than direct scene-for-scene or lampooning. He adopts the tone of Tony Scott or a David Fincher when the need serves him, but adopting such sensibilities does bump up against the comedic sensibilities at times. 

There's some of The Lonely Island's trademark pop-culture riffing, with an 80-styled montage of Frank Jr. and Beth, whisking away to a log cabin and having sexy times, but quickly turning weird when they build a snowman, practice witchcraft and bring the snowman to life...and it just gets weirder from there. It's mashing so many references and genres together, it made my brain spin, and yes, I loved it. 

On a joke density level, it's pretty high, especially for a modern comedy released in cinemas (ha... what's that?) but its still not to the level of the original Naked Gun... but I say this with only one viewing. Part of what makes the original so fantastic is familiarity, having watched it dozens of times so as to have seen every joke it has to offer. I have to wonder/hope this version has more in store than upon first watch.

As said, Neeson is game. He's not been shy about dispelling his on-screen image, from A Million Days to Die in the West to The Lego Batman Movie to a cameo in Donald Glover's Atlanta, it's clear the man has a sense of humour and is more than aware of his on-screen persona to subvert it.  After seeing Paul Walter Houser steal his main scene in Fantastic Four: First Steps, I was hoping he would have a bigger spotlight here, but as Ed Jr. he gets about as much screen time as George Kennedy would, but his presence is still enjoyably welcome. Pamela Anderson's comeback career trucks on, after The Last Showgirl showed everyone (who watch it...it's on my list) that she has real-deal acting chops, here she's able to spotlight her comedic sensibilities once again, and all you need is "Sassafras Chicken in D" to tell you she's got the goods. It's hard to think who the modern Ricardo Montalbon or Robert Goulet, because Hollywood doesn't really produce these kind of personalities anymore... and Danny Huston is far too good and capable an actor to be considered in their league, but he does a really good job, culminating in that amazing final showdown with Neeson in the end.

The biggest letdown of this new film is it didn't feature the patented Naked Gun opening title sequence with James Ira Newborn's rollicking, swinging, horn wail of an theme playing over scenes of a police siren wailing while it intones a cop car driving through ludicrous situations (it does play the theme during the end credits and reedits the opening sequences from the original trilogy, which seems a poor concession). That said, the title card of the film does have a good gag, and there are jokes scattered throughout the end credits.

Will The Naked Gun revive comedies on the big screen, or, will it just revive more parody movies (in which case, God help us all)?

One final note, I took my kids (16 and 23) to see the film, and it played well for my eldest who is kind of obsessed with procedurals and detective stories, but my teen hasn't really ever engaged with the genre and found only a few scenes really amusing. This generation of kids who experience most of culture through youtube videos and tiktoks of other people talking about culture makes this kind of spoofing and satirizing difficult, because the kids don't have the cinematic language for it. Or maybe that's just my kid.

 


Thursday, September 12, 2024

KsMIRT: August wind-up [part 2]

K'sMIRT is Kent's Month in Reviewing Television, where each month (or mebbe twice each month?!?) I step through the TV series I completed watching each month in the 1 Great-1 Good-1 Bad format. 

This (half) Month:
Unsolved Mysteries Volume 4 (2024, 5/5 episodes, Netflix)
Batman: Caped Crusader Season 1 (2024, 10/10 episodes, AmazonPrime)
G.I. Joe: Renegades Season 1 (2010, 16/26 episodes, Tubi) 
Time Bandits Season 1 (2024, 2/10 episodes, Apple TV+)
Derry Girls Series 3 (2022, 7/7 episodes, Netflix)

---
Unsolved Mysteries Volume 4

The What 100:  The big pappy of true crime series returns with five new yet-to-be-solved events of a suspicious nature. These include new looks at Jack the Ripper and the mothman (having now migrated from its usual West Virginia stomping grounds to Illinois' Chicago area), as well as a "who did it?" in Calgary, a "whose head is that" in Florida, and a cold case of a murdered college student on campus in the late 1970s.

(1 Great) Having watched many a season of the vintage Robert Stack-led Unsolved Mysteries giving myself many a night terror as a result, I have to say the new, host-less, hour-long, true crime documentary-style format is pretty great. For the most part, I like how this format frequently teases out the mystery for a good while. The storytelling, the editing is exceptionally good, and as a result a lot of these stories have a stickiness to them that make them hard to easily forget or let go of. I puzzled over "The Body in the Basement", a captivating highlight (and gut wrenching tragedy) for days before my brain settled in on there being no answers to the questions it was asking. Did she fall or was she pushed? If those are her own footprints in her blood, why did she stop short of going upstairs? What happened to her phone? Was the door locked or not? Why were there no paw prints in the blood? So many questions that make no sense.

(1 Good) I like that even though it's using this new, host-less, hour-long, true crime documentary-style format, it's not just going with murder/death mysteries, but still exploring the paranormal phenomena the original series did with the same documentary-style lens as the other stories. The Jack the Ripper bit was probably the least intriguing because we're no closer to answers than we were two decades ago, but this was all about dispelling myths. "The Mothman Revisted" episode, though, was neat for how it cited the classic Stack episode on the Mothman, but had something definitely new to talk about. The middle episode, as well, neither a murder/death mystery, nor a paranormal mystery, but instead, a found embalmed head and the people trying to identify it. Curious.

(1 Bad) What's missing from this series that the Stack series had was updates. It directs you online for submitting any tips or info on the subjects at hand and for updates, but the old series used to do updates on repeats or in a subsequent episode, if there were updates to be had. There was something very satisfying about them. In this host-less, hour-long, true crime documentary-style format on Netflix, there's not the same space for updates that there was in a 20+ episode season of a weekly TV series. That said, they could drop Unsolved Mysteries updates on Netflix at any time, as part of a season or just stand alone.  I don't know why they haven't unless nothing material has come of any of the cases yet.

META: I don't really do a lot of true crime... I've dipped into a podcast or two, I watch the occasional documentary film or series, but it's not a regular part of my diet. Still, I actively look forward to each "Volume" of Unsolved Mysteries. Something about having a dose of the unresolved in my diet is very stimulating mentally, even if the subject matter is disturbing.  I can't explain it.
... Wait.... there's a podcast?!? And Volume 5 is coming... October 2nd!

---
Batman: Caped Crusader Season 1
The What 100: It's a new Batman animated series from the co-creator of Batman: The Animated Series...Bruce Timm. He's backed by The Batman writer-director Matt Reeves as well as J.J. Abrams and his Bad Robot production company. It's a more mature animated series set in a vaguely 1930's/40's noirish reality, and early in Batman's career as a vigilante. The over-arching stories are about district attorney Harvey Dent's fraught campaign for mayor, and corruption in both politics and the legal system.

(1 Great) As jarring as they may be, I absolutely love the swings this series is taking. Actually being set in the 1930's (ish) rather than the "neo-'30's deco-styled modern Gotham" of The Animated Series allows it to establish a very specific tone, that of the hardboiled, noir stories of the era. On top of that it plays fast and loose with established Batman lore. The Penguin who pops up in the first episode is not at all like any Penguin we've seen before, but I think she's incredible. Same with the divergences for Harley Quinn or Gentleman Ghost or Firebug, among others. 

(1 Good) It's a show aimed less at satisfying the comic book geek and instead scratching the pulp origins itch that clearly Timm always had and never shook.  It's aged up in terms of tone, for a cartoon it's happier with the darker corners of its world and emotions. It's not unapproachable for children, but it's not softened for them either. Batman's kind of a dickhead (every time he coldly calls Alfred "Pennyworth" I die inside just a little...but there's that moment of redemption in the finale that shows there's room for character growth in this series). They're also not afraid of finite ends to their stories or characters, so tread lightly with your expectations.

(1 Bad) As much as I understand the series is not much interested in a world of spandex, and that it's creating its villains as if they were out of 30's and 40's cinema, I still desperately want the mythology to flesh itself out. I want hints that Barbara is going to be Batgirl and Renee will become The Question. They're both agents of upholding the law, but they're both becoming more and more aware of how the system fails, and I wonder how long they can keep at it before they become disillusioned and join Batman in his style of justice?

META: If one is doing a new Batman for TV, it either needs to be a bold reset, or a near-continuation of what has come before. Rarely is it ever a near-continuation of what has come before, and bold resets can lead to disgruntled fanboys (is there any other type?). The word on the street for The Caped Crusader (despite the creatives saying otherwise) was that it was a continuation, or maybe a prequel to The Animated Series. It is not. If anything, though, because TAS was so art deco inspired and had that feel of the 1930s, it's almost like this didn't veer far enough away from that aesthetic to fully distinguish itself. I think that's what many fans who may wind up disliking this are feeling. But I dig it.

---
G.I. Joe: Renegades

The What 100:  Scarlett recruits Duke, Roadblock, Tunnel Rat and Ripcord on a secret mission to infiltrate Cobra Industries and expose it for what it is, not a multinational manufacturer of diverse goods and services, but a secret military with designs on taking over the world with experimental, illegal technology. Not only do they have their hands in seemingly everyone's pockets, but they have their own 24 hour news network to spread whatever lies and disinformation they want. And so, our heroes, in trying to uncover this new world-class evil, are instead brandished as terrorists and outlaws and are on the run from their very own military employers.

(1 Great) I clued in during the initial two-parter that it seemed kind of A-Team-ish in its construction, and then the third episode rolled out its new opening credits:
"Accused of a crime they didn't commit, a ragtag band of fugitives fights a covert battle to clear their names and expose the insidious enemy that is... Cobra. Some call them outlaws. Some call them heroes. But these determined men and women think of themselves only as 'Ordinary Joes'. And this is their story."
Yah, it's the A-Team all right. Each episode is mostly just the Renegades roll into town, find the townspeople embroiled in something Cobra Industries related and they try to help out or expose it. It's formulae, and it's nothing groundbreaking, but it's pretty great.  

(1 Good) I was genuinely surprised by the episode "Homecoming Part 1" which jumps into flashbacks of the origin of Duke's rivalry with Flint which is some pretty deep character building for ostensibly a kids' cartoon. There's a lot of nuance introduced into their dynamic which then pays off in "Homecoming Part 2" where the Joes are captured by the military, with straight-laced, by-the-book Flint maybe seeing a crack in his worldview.

(1 Bad) I do get why this didn't resonate with Joe fans. Despite being exceptionally well animated, it's too divergent from the core G.I. Joe idea, that of a highly trained special mission force who are in an open battle against terrorist organization Cobra. The silent war of Renegades is so 2010, of anti-capitalism, and illicit behind-the-scenes dealings, of there being forces in the world so large that nothing will change in the way the world works unless they decide it should change... it's heavy shit, and G.I. Joe isn't really that known for its heavy shit.  Plus, like Batman: The Caped Crusader all of the characters are some type of reinvention of their previous incarnations. Snow Job, Shipwreck, Dr. Mindbender, all of them, with the exception of Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow (again with this ninja shit) seem pretty vastly different from how they've been portrayed elsewhere. It's hard to just sit back and enjoy it, and not want it to just get over its "on-the-run" business and become outright Joes vs. Cobra.

META: It's G.I. Joe, but the A-Team! It seems incredible to me - the me of 2024 - that any regular series would so blatantly rip off the formulae of an old TV series (uh, like Poker Face did Columbo?) but a cursory look at 2010 and yeah, the Liam Neeson-led A-Team movie had just hit, and I think this was made in parallel production. I bet that they had banked on the A-Team movie being a massive success (where the first G.I. Joe live action movie truly wasn't) and they would look like geniuses for reformulating G.I. Joe in that manner. But the A-Team failed (not dismally, but not inspiring a whole new generation of A-Team obsessed kids) and so did Renegades. Even the long-running G.I. Joe action figure line produced a wave or two of figures styled after this cartoon (pretty great looking figures) but failed to ignite much fervour (much of it went on clearance, though they've since become pretty collectible). I'm just picking off episodes here and there, but I will definitely complete it (and probably be sad there isn't more when I'm done).

---
Time Bandits Season 1

The What 100: A reimagining of the 1981 Terry Gilliam film by Taika Waititi, Jemaine Clement and Iain Morris. Young, talkative, nerdy Kevin is 10 years old and not very well liked by anyone. He's bullied at school and by his sister, and his parents, obsessed with their phones, don't understand why their unusual, curious, intelligent child isn't into "normal" stuff. When a  troupe of time traveling thieves with a stolen time map use his bedroom as a passageway, he finds himself swept up in their journey, much to the chagrin of the Bandits.

(1 Great) The show, by and large, looks pretty good. There are some interesting sequences, displays of effects (both practical and digital) that are quite eye catching or stimulating.

(1 Good) Jemaine Clement plays a ruler of demons, a sort of devil, one might say, that is very interested in the bandits and their time map. The scenes of Clement in his ample prosthetic make-up and the absurd hellscape sets he's in are pretty imaginative.

(1 Bad) We only made it two episodes in.  Both episodes were written by Clement, Morris and Waititi with Waititi directing. We have ample love for Waititi and Clement, both individually and together Lady Kent and I do, and yet this did not work at all for either of us. There were a few chuckles but no real laughs, there was a twinge of interest, a glimmer of adventure, but most of it fell flat. Kevin is supposed to be annoying and young Kal-El Tuck really gets it, but there's too much of this riding on his nascent shoulders. The leaderless bandits are led by Lisa Kudrow's put-upon Penelope, but it's Kudrow's sense of smart-idiot quirk that doesn't jibe well with the sensibilities of Waititi and Clement as I know them.  Unlike Our Flag Means Death or What We Do In The Shadows, the writers and performers do not give their individual bandits enough unique character or charisma to stand out. They are a unit that all seem to behave much the same way, they're not very fun.  

META: I have only seen Gilliam's Time Bandits once as an adult, and it didn't resonate with me. At this point it's a vague memory. I more recently read the Marvel comics adaptation (like maybe last year even) and I can't remember that at all. Perhaps it's the property that doesn't work for me.  But specifically here, I look at the repartee of Our Flag... or The Completely Made-up Adventures of Dick Turpin and there's a template there for these types of characters and how to make them funny and subversive and for some reason these very talented creators just couldn't figure it out.  But is it the writing, or the casting? I'm not sure any of the bandits besides Kudrow stands out, and she stands out for the wrong reason. It just doesn't work and I'm feeling completely uninspired to return to it.

---
Derry Girls Series 3

The What 100: One final go for the girls from Derry, their families, and Sister George Michael. As The Troubles reach their revolutionary turning point in the mid-1990s, the girls come of age, ready to graduate and it seems all of Ireland is ready to move on to the next moments of their lives.

(1 Great) The best episode of the series is "The Reunion" which finds the moms and aunties and their friends reuniting for their high school reunion. This leads to all the old anxieties, hurt feelings, and pubescent emotions rushing back, with long buried secrets trying to crawl out of their grave and embarrass everyone. It's an episode replete with flashbacks of the women in their younger years of the late-70's with the obvious parallels to the main young cast of Derry Girls providing the most rewarding threads (especially considering that Mary used to behave exactly like Erin does and yet she comes down on her so hard for it). The whole long-buried (literally) secret is a great through line and provides a little mystery to unfold to really suck in the audience. It's a wonderfully crafted, hilarious episode.

(1 Good) After two highly, highly successful seasons, Series 3 seems to break out of its small-scale shell and go much, much bigger with every episode. It's almost like a different show, the scale of production seems that much larger, and the writing that much better at balancing the adventures of the young cast and their parents, grandparents and teachers such that it doesn't just feel like a teen comedy anymore.  In some ways it could be seen as a betrayal of what was established before, but in other ways it feels like it's finally coming into itself, somewhat unfettered by its previous limitations. Most of the episodes this season take place on location, whether it's another town, or on a train, or at a police precinct with Liam Neeson in charge.  My initial impulse is to bristle a things like appearances by Neeson or Fatboy Slim, but they're really just damn good fun.

(1 Bad)  Episode six finds the teens trying to get tickets to a Fatboy Slim concert being held in town. When they come up in the line to buy tickets, Clare has a meet-cute with the ticket girl, except they are the last tickets available. The street toughs behind them aren't pleased and accuse them of jumping the queue and then want to fight James for the tickets. Things take a turn, and later Michelle goes on a sob-story-leads-to-wish-giving TV program and lies about James getting beaten up and their tickets being stolen. This leads to the Girls being VIPs for the concert but Clare the whole time is just fixated on meeting up with the ticket girl. The Girls have another encounter with the street toughs, while Clare makes out with ticket girl, and they get thrown out, yet it's still pretty triumphant overall. A rollicking episode. Except Clare's dad dies and it ends with her big gay triumph undercut by weepy memorial for her Da.  Why? What does this serve, like, at all? Did we ever even meet Clare's dad in the series? Why decimate this triumphant moment for her like this? Even if it's something true from the creator or staff writer's lives, there's no time in this show for this rapid mood swing in the storytelling. It's the most bizarre creative moment of the series and leaves a real bad taste for the penultimate episode.

META: As I mentioned when I last wrote about this show, each series is too short. Even at 7 episodes it's not nearly enough. There's only a total of 19 episode in the entire run. There's something to be said about not milking a premise or quitting whilst one is ahead, but when you have this great of a setup there's so many possibilities for storytelling. I feel like they barely scratched the surface and we barely got to know these characters. Their growth from series to series seemed so spontaneous.  And it's not like you can just do a revival, since these performer are only getting older (Saoirse-Monica Jackson in The Decameron now looks like a grownup, no longer a viable teen), so they needed to do more when they could have. It's a shame.  Like, why not just a Sister George Michael spin-off show then?