Wednesday, January 4, 2023

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (MV3)

2022, Sam Raimi (Spider-Man) -- Disney+

OK, rewatch complete. And I got ta tell ya, second time around I felt pretty much as I did the first time... it was alright. I almost wished I could have approached the viewing, even the second viewing, after having read his post, as Kent did, with Sam Raimi's film making fully in mind. Maybe it would have worked out better if I had seen it in the spectacle focused environment of the cinema. Maybe.

The 2 cents plot for this movie is that a multiverse hopping teenager shows up and interrupts Christine's (remember? Strange's ex? Rachel McAdams, The Time Traveler's Wife) wedding reception being chased by a giant, initially invisible, eye-ball monster. It, the good Doctor (Benedict Cumberbatch, The Power of the Dog) and Wong ([Benedict] Wong, The Martian) fight, and wreck real estate (who do you think is assigned to clean up dead giant monsters?) while defending America Chavez (Xochitl Gomez [soh-chee], Gentefied), the teenager whose superpower is to open star-shaped portals from one universe to the next, when she is under duress. Being hunted by eye-ball demons that want to suck her power from her is a good definition of duress. Turns out Doc has been helping her in a previous universe, before dying. Stephen sees this preamble as a dream, and the rule of the universe, that what we dream is in fact lives in other universes, is set. 

Really? Dreams are windows into other universes? If so, then kudos to Other Universe Toast, as he seems to have it so much better put together than this universe's version. Most of my non-nightmare dreams are punctuated by a marked lack of anxiety & stress that is ever present in my waking world. When I wake, these feelings slowly fade, leaving me envious of my Other, even with his questionable fashion choices -- in many dream universes, I am still wearing voluminous Constantine (tine not teen) style trench coats, like it was 1992.

So, MCUniverse Doctor Strange notices that the monster was covered in runes, a sign of witchcraft, and heads off to consult the only witch he knows, a certain, possibly scarlet coloured one? Yeah, Wanda (Elizabeth Olsen, Old Boy) shows up, hot off the tails of Wandavision, lacking a post which cannot be blamed on the 2018 Hiatus. For those who didn't watch it back then, and don't care about spoilers, Wanda took over a town, and using her powers, manipulated it and everyone in it, into believing she was a happy various-sitcom-era family, with Vis(ion) and two annoyingly precocious boys. She literally conjured the boys up. When it all ended, so did the boys. And her mental stability. Her current idea is that in every other universe, she actually had those children, or kept them, and all she has to do is get to one, to have it all back. That makes her the BBEG of this movie.

So, that whole idea is weird. Either she actually figured out how to have children with Vis in all the other universes (he was a robot for those not recalling), before he was killed in the Thanos fight. OR she conjured them, AND kept them. Likely, every universe has its own weird or bad choice, that apparently leads to single mom Wanda with two annoying kids. And MCUniverse Wanda wants that.

The rest of the movie is Strange and Wong playing keep-away with America, eventually leading to the two being tossed through one of her portals. The fly-through of the different universes is fun, until they eventually end up in a weird, almost idyllic one full of flowers and memory machines and Bruce Campbell. And a big statue of Stephen, who died fighting Thanos. Who didn't die is this universe's version of the Avengers, a weird collection of squee-worthy cameos who call themselves The Illuminati. They include Professor X (Patrick Stewart, Logan), Reed Richards / Mister Fantastic (John Krasinski, A Quiet Place), Captain Carter (fresh out of What If...? Hayley Atwell, Blinded by the Light), Baron Mordo (Chiwetel Ejiofor, Love Actually), Monica Maria Rambeau ver. Captain Marvel (Lashana Lynch, No Time to Die) and Black Bolt (Anson Mount, Inhumans). They have decided that the real BBEG is Strange himself, for his own universe hopping and dark magic meddling lead to the annihilation of some other universe. Its a weird plot pivot that doesn't work for me, but it does delay any potential Team-Up, before they are off-ed by Wanda anyway, in the most horrific ways. Enter final act / final battle !

Final Act pits America and Strange and Wong against Wanda on Mount Wundagore, a magical mountain where The Scarlett Witch is prophesized to become the most powerful. This is a weird nod, along with the green cow man at Kamar-Taj, to the High Evolutionary and his "new-men", weird genetic half animal, half men. Its also a place mixed up in the magic of the comic book universe. Strange goes to yet another universe, one where he let himself get corrupted and is in the final stage of being destroyed, to get some help from the magic book, the DarkHold, that created The Scarlett Witch. But this Stephen is different than all the others, so he defeats Wanda with compassion and refuses to kill America, which would have solved all the universes woes.

The write up was a lot of fun. As was the movie. It was just .... well, just fun. But what else should comic book movies be? I guess, I am just, by this stage in the decades long MCU, hoping for a little ... more. Especially from Raimi. But that's just me.

Speaking of multiverse fun, the "designation" (which Stephen learns from Illuminati Christine) for our MCU is Earth-616. Buuuut to all the comic book fans, they know that is the designation for the prime universe of the comics. So, MCU 616 is not aware of another main universe that lays claim to the 616 designation, and in fact designates MCU as 199999. Not sure if that is really fun, or just another weird pivot.

Tuesday, January 3, 2023

Spider-Man: No Way Home (MV2)

2021, Jon Watts (Cop Car) -- download

Started in November, 2022...

I need a new segment, "I Really Should ReWatch" where I just don't get around to writing about a movie when its fresh in my mind, so it gets relegated to the "3 Short Paragraphs" which are never short, and often not three. This also aligns with my desire to rewatch Marvel movies, as they are now, all these years later, just comfort food, something to put on in the background when you are allowed to be distracted by your phone, or washing dishes, or supper or the cats. But I haven't done so for Dune yet [ed. note: yes, I did !], which I really need to do, and I haven't done for this one yet. What is tampering with my desire? Did I not like it? It was alright enough and chock full of nostalgia, which is always my game. But what... what is it? What delayed me? What required multiple failed attempts?

Peter Parker has been revealed to the world by the faux extra-dimensional hero Mysterio, in a final ploy before his death. The accusations are cleared up pretty quickly (without any real resolution), but the secret identify cannot be put back into the box. Its affecting everything about his life, and the life of his friends and family. So, he goes to Doctor Strange to get a spell to ... change things? Everything about that premise just seems off to me, as well as this depiction of Strange. That he would even consider the idea of altering so many memories or reality itself made me wonder if this was entirely a side-reference to the coming Strange movie, and this was most definitely not the Strange from the other Marvel movies, but some multiverse doppel. Even the hair was weird. Alas, no such reveal or hint is really made, he just makes weird choices which have huge ramifications, as Wong points out immediately.

ed. note: rewatch started; stopped, restarted again.

OK, let me get this out of the way. I understand they make the world's reaction extreme, because we wouldn't have a movie about things going Much Worse, if things hadn't gone wrong to begin with. But why? I get that Mysterio came along and beat up some Bad Guy elemental monsters, but Spider-Man was one of the Avengers who Saved The World. Even if the world at large isn't deeply aware of everything he did, the information is out there. So, why believe Mysterio over all these high profile people who obviously Did Good ? Sure, just like in our Pandemic World, there are fucking idiots who believe the worst about everything, and they are highlighted by the reactions of the PE Teacher in Peter's school, but... really? The world is so against him he and his friends get banned from every university? Just not buying it. Or moreso (I don't usually subscribe to the idea that the masses make the language, but in this parallel universe, "more so" is a single word), I don't want to buy it.

Alas, without A we don't get B, so...

Enter Bad Choice A. Peter goes to Doctor Strange to ask for the spell to change the world's memories, so they don't know he is Spider-Man. And despite the two wizards, Wong and Strange, saying its not a good idea, they still proceed with an attempt. But mid-casting, Peter asks Strange to alter the conditions... multiple times. Basically he wants all the people who knew he was Spider-Man before the Mysterio incident to continue knowing he is Spider-Man. That Strange is going to just blunder into casting a spell on the wishes of a teenager, one that will alter the fabric of reality, without thinking it all the way through first is just ... weird. So weird that I quickly started my own head-canon that this was not the MCU's (616) Strange, but one of the multiverse Strange's who's up to no good, as I said above. What If has already introduced the idea of a number of nefarious Strange's who want to alter reality to suit their own desires.

But no, no head-canon, just really Bad Choice B - the actual casting of the spell and altering mid-casting.

That leads to the actual point of the movie, and the most fun bit, so I'll allow it (yes, in MY universe, everything is on my allowance, of course). As the spell is being cast, villains and characters from the other Spider-Man movies appear in MCU Peter's universe. First up, Doc Ock from the Raimi movies. And then, more. Enough more that Strange gives Peter a magical doo-dad to help capture all these other universe interlopers and cage them in the basement of the Sanctum Sanctorum. But when Peter learns that each of them dies in their own universe, he devises a plan to help them instead of just returning them.

Bad Choice C. Dude, just leave well enough alone. Stop messing with the multiverse. Stop being such a Nice Guy Hero. 

ed. note: rewatch derailed.... for months. And then restarted, and finally completed.

Of course, it all goes wrong, even more so than the idea of Bad Guys From Everywhere showing up. Peter's Good Dead goes severely punished, as first Green Goblin proves himself more goblin than Osbourne, and kills Aunt Mae, but also Electro decides he likes being his electric self (I mean, are we that surprised by that?) and the energy this universe, the Iron Man arc reactor energy, can provide. Peter's plan has failed miserably

Note: I am not sure if it was this prevalent in the original Spider-Man movies, but Green Goblin seems to have super strength and limited invulnerability? I always assumed he was just an insane genius on a flying carpet armed with bombs, but he goes toe to toe with MCU Peter, doing an INCREDIBLE amount of damage to Happy's condo and building.

All is lost; enter other Peters. The first time I saw this, I thought it cute but kind of annoying. This time I found it terribly endearing.  Maguire Peter Parker is kind of like the pizza-eating Spider-Man from Into the Spider-Verse but less angst, more "hip youth pastor", as Garfield Peter Parker points out. Garfield is definitely full of angst, even anguish, over what he has lost. They are all rightfully grossed out as to where Maguire's webbing comes from. But without much multi-verse brain bending, they pull together for MCU Peter Parker, to actually "cure" all the villains of their universes. 

Exxxxxxcept, the damage done by Strange's spell is already gone too far, and OTHER universe villains seem to be seeping through the big purple cracks in the sky. Really, Strange? This is all Peter's fault? Surer he interfered with your spell, but it was YOUR spell. If you are so high and mighty as the Protector of the Multiverse, then why the fuck did you fuck with the entire world's memories in the first place? That said, its ironic that the only way to "cure the universe" is to wipe EVERYONE'S memories of MCU Peter Parker. Not sure how that effects the already messed up timeline, and Peter's place in this world, but sure... make already sad Peter, sadder.

So, this one established firmly, in the MCU (cinematic, not TV) that the MultiVerse is there, not just out there but right there, on the cusp of being irrevocably altered by the MCU futzing around in it. So, then Stange comes along as does just that.



3 Short Paragraphs (Or Not): Warriors of Future

2022,  Yuen Fai Ng (debut for a known visual effects specialist) -- Netflix

Surprisingly, I didn't dislike this as much as I thought I would. Why would I watch it, if I suspected I would not like it? For the same reasons I watched Shanghai Fortress or The Wandering Earth. And those reasons are not entirely clear to me but that I really enjoy gonzo over-the-top scifi, and the Chinese seem to be embracing the idea of late. Alas, they also seem to be embracing the mid to late 90s aesthetic of what scifi was trying to be: big, bombastic and kind of stupid.

Like these previous movies, this one begins as if it was the second movie. It is The Future, or to use the irritatingly bad grammar of the movie's english title, "It is future." The world is shite; environmental catastrophe & endless robot augmented warfare has reduced us to hiding under big domes called "Skynets". If you are worried about robots doing you harm, I suggest a different name for your refuges. Anywayz, this is just the setting of the movie, as the premise is based around a meteor crashing to Earth bringing with it an evil plant they call Pandora. While Pandora causes great destruction, it also cleanses the air around it. Dilemma!! Also, Pandora grows when it rains.

The military's science department has developed a "gene bullet" that can beneficially alter Pandora, and they have to do so before a big BIG rain storm comes along which will grow the plant beyond the area of the city they have already abandoned. If they don't deploy the bullet before the rainstorm, they will be forced to blow up the plant with a nuke, which will also kill hundreds of thousands of civilians. Dillema!!

Just as the mission is about to succeed, their military commander, who has a large stake in the Skynets, sabotages it by turning his robots against his own soldiers. There is also a hint that he is mostly robot himself, but that never really plays out. Anywayz, a couple of brave heroes decide to defy orders and go into the ruined/abandoned city to find the bullet and deploy it, before the rain, before the big bomb.

Despite this familiar mega-melodramatic setup, the way the movie plays out is not all that bad. Sure, its obvious they are once again ripping off as many other scifi movies as they can, but even the slightly wonky CG effects are gripping and well-done. Draped in battle armour, that they keep on opening the visors of, our tortured heroes fight plant tentacles, big bugs, spider bots (walking tanks), and the ruins themselves until they finally defeat Pandora AND reveal their commander as a Bad Guy.

Its exciting, bombastic and yeah, kind of stupid but still, rather enjoyable.

The Banshees of Inisherin

 2022, d. Martin McDonagh - Disney+

In 1923 on an Irish isle, Pádraic (a very shaggy Colin Farrell) calls upon his best mate Colm (Brendan Gleeson) to go round pub way, so. Colm doesn't answer, even though Pádraic can see him thru the window, just sitting there. Down at pub, people ask Pádraic where Colm is, since they're always together... are they rowing?  Pádraic doesn't think so, but he questions it.  When Colm eventually turns up at pub (there's nothing else to do round there) he's not speaking to Pádraic and when he does, he tells him to just leave him be.  This vexes Pádraic greatly.  Eventually Colm tells Pádraic that he's direly boring, and life's too short for him to be wasting time listening to Pádraic's tales of what he found in donkey shite.  Colm just wants to be left alone to write music, to leave something lasting in the world, to be remembered (perhaps as something other than a bore himself).

What follows is a darkly comic tale of isolated small-town life, of people who are close to each other, too close perhaps, whether they want to be or not.  The stress of an Irish civil war encroaches from across the water, which seems to be affecting the mindset of the community, though few seek to acknowledge it.  The simple life they've known for generations isn't so simple anymore when the gunshots and cannons can be heard echoing across the straight. 

Pádraic's sister Siobhán (Kerry Condon) questions whether Colm might be depressed, but Colm rejects this summary, yet his outbursts of self harm directed at Pádraic seem as much a cry for help as a warning to keep away.  Things escalate as Colm threatens further self harm if Pádraic speaks to him ever again, and escalate further when Pádraic experiences multiple losses at once, indirectly related.

The tonal balance McDonagh manages with this production is astounding, at once hilarious and heartbreaking.  There's an innate humour in the Irish brogue and natural small town interactions, full of politeness and civility though only genuine half the time, which even as things get dark, still remains.  The countryside vistas are lovingly and gorgeously shot - the living seems both drearily simple and yet quite tranquil.

What could have been an oversimplified two-hander with Farrell and Gleeson is instead a well constructed microcosm of personalities, each superficially recognizable.  Colm and Pádraic were likely superficial characters the day before this story began as well, but they both become far more interesting as a result of the events of the film.  

I sometimes wonder, if like Pádraic, I too am dull, that people no longer want to be around me. There's a very specific pain, the pain of rejection, confused thoughts and not understanding that come with that situation.  Pádraic's pain is relatable.  

But so too is Colm's.  Clearly in his later years of life, his contemplating the meaning of it all has left him with serious doubts, depression, and anxieties.  He's afraid of death, but he's more afraid of not knowing the purpose of life, and he focuses all his bitterness about it towards poor Pádraic who he knows doesn't understand and only becomes more frustrated in his attempts to explain it.  I think Colm, in his depression, but also as an emotionally reserved man, wants to be free of the stress of caring, the stress of being cared for.  If nobody cares if he dies then he's not hurting anyone.  Yet he's angry at himself for still caring.  It's a simple, simple story, but with deep emotional complexities.

Monday, January 2, 2023

Glass Onion

2022, d. Rian Johnson - Netflix

The key to a good murder mystery is (he says, having not been overly steeped in the genre throughout his life) not the mystery itself, but the players involved and the situation they're involved in.  Most mysteries (not just the murderous ones) worth their salt aren't of the "whodunnit" sort where the audience is given the clues to figure out the perpetrator.  That's actually the worst type of mystery because you don't want the audience to figure it out before the film reveals it.  In fact, if you lay out clues too heavy-handedly, the audience will spend more time trying to puzzle out the answer than paying attention to the story, and that's death for any storyteller.

Look at a movie like 1984's Clue that infamously was send out to theatres with three different endings.  This meant that the details within the film were presented in such a way that three different endings (at least), with three different murderers (at least) could exist.  Glass Onion, like its predecessor, Knives Out, is not so openly constructed.  The seeds of the film's resolution are laid throughout the entire production, but they're also only part of the story.

Glass Onion finds a billionaire tech mogul (I was going to write "genius" but we're all learning that these tech moguls aren't exactly geniuses) inviting his old friends out to his luxurious island estate for a weekend murder mystery party.  Also invited was the partner he screwed out of the company, and, on accident (or by someone's design), world renowned cajun detective Benoit Blanc.  The opening set-up is perhaps overlong, but its playfulness means it's far from dull.  Before the team hit the island, there's a heavy COVID-times vibe, with masks and stranger wariness that threatens to overshadow the film, but is quickly dispensed with with the wave of an aerosol can (the rich have solutions to problems the rest of us don't have access to).

The murder mystery party is a bust (Benoit Blanc is just too good), and so the party just becomes a party, but unspoken tensions fill the room.  Then the manosphere bro of the group collapses on the floor, the lights go out, and gunshots explode.  Things get serious from there.  As they do, the danger looms and the suspicions spiral out and it comes to a head with another death at the end of the very extended first act.  

In an average film at this point we would be pausing to contemplate, the who, the how, the why.  But Johnson instead takes us back to the beginning and offers us another perspective, additional insights we weren't privy to before, and deceptions that he, as a filmmaker, intentionally let us believe.  And once he unveils all this new information...we're still no better off, no clearer on the who and the why.

And so, the third act...where everyone is gathered together and the great detective lays it all out...but there's no police, no one's coming, and to say anymore would be telling...but it's a very elaborate Rube Goldberg machine Johnson sets up, and once the domino is tipped, it moves rapidly and expands and expands, using all the pieces laid down in a very exciting and satisfying conclusion.

You wouldn't think a murder mystery would be an EVENT film, but that's the scale this operates on, and succeeds at doing so.  It's also not just a trifle.  It has things to say about the people involved in the story, and their real world counterparts, in fact the story entirely hinges upon it.  I've always appreciated how Johnson negotiates both characters and story in his features, he operates on multiple levels, and an audience can choose to accept (or reject) his films at any of those tiers.

It's clear the cast were having a blast in making this, and Daniel Craig especially loves being Benoit Blanc.  That's a good thing since Johnson has at least one more of these owed to Netflix.  I'd take a half dozen or more.


Guillermo Del Toro's Pinocchio

2022, d. Guillermo Del Toro, Mark Gustafson - Netflix

I've never been too interested in the story of Pinocchio, but it's very clear that many a filmmaker (most of generations before me) are particularly compelled by it.  The cautionary tale of a naive, lying, troublesome boy, full of self-indulgence and oblivious to the consequences of his actions always just grated on me (I was a good boy), and the Disney animated interpretation always seemed heavy-handed in its intentions of getting obedient, well-behaved children

Guillermo Del Toro's new, gorgeous, stop-motion interpretation leans quite specifically into Del Toro's interests in the darker aspects of fantasy, and moreso the darker aspects of life. The film opens with a  father and son, the bond they have, the love they share, as Gepetto educates his boy Carlo on the world as he knows it, but the spectre of World War I, though nearing its end, looms ominously as planes fly overhead, wowing the young boy.  Carlo is killed in an accidental bombing, and Gepetto is absolutely destroyed. Years pass, and Gepetto is a bitter drunk, and in a fit of drunken sorrow, he chops down the tree Carlos planted and hastily fashions a new puppet who is enchanted while he is passed out.

What comes to life is a nightmare of pine and nails, and his initial reveal is presented in the language of horror cinema, but it quickly steps out of it into an entirely different horror, a naive innocent who is curious about everything but is too much of a hurricane to actually learn anything.  He stumbles into town, wandering into church where the religous think him a demon, but the local arm of facist rule is particularly intrigued.  Pinocchio is rejected by his papa, a burden, and as such he flees into the world and has to learn on his own, without parental guidance.

The backdrop of fascism of Musillini's Italy, becomes foreground and the threat of conscripting Pinocchio into a youth regimen is eventually fulfilled a fate he doesn't really understand the implications of. 

Amidst the ample fancifulness, such as Pinocchio's various trips to the afterlife and a particularly gnarly re-envisioning of the whale, there's a heaviness and severity to Del Toro's Pinocchio, full of abusive adult figures, a brutal regime, and war.  The biggest message of the film is not Pinocchio's usual "fall in line, obey your parents" but rather "know when it's right to break the rules" for children, and for adults "accept your children for who they are". It also posits that abusive parents love their children deep down, but doubles down on it being a parents actions, demonstrations of love, that matter most.

The stop-motion animation is outstanding, beautifully and richly detailed, but animated so finely (as Del Toro says, "if you animate the ordinary, you will achieve something extraordinary") with innovative puppets that it truly looks like nothing else. We're pretty steeped in miniatures in our household and to contemplate the vast amount of minis required to create such a natural world is mind boggling (as much as I liked the movie, the 35-minute making-of featurette was even more fascinating to me).

The cast is pretty solid, but very anglicized (but all writing is in Italian, and the towns and landscapes are steeped in the aesthetics of Italy), when I wonder if a more Italian-oriented voice cast would have met the visual authenticity more appropriately.  That said, I loved Christoph Waltz, Tilda Swinton and Cate Blanchett (doing primarily monkey sounds).  There are songs in the film from Alexander Desplat which don't strive for "musical!" feel, but something much more organic to the production bleeding out of, then back into the score.  They're not bangers, but they feel integral.

It's still Pinocchio, but it's not the same old Pinocchio.  I like it more than any other interpretation of Pinocchio before it, by far.  It's perhaps the last Pinocchio we need, and probably the best.  It's also one of Del Toro's finest productions.

Sunday, January 1, 2023

I Saw This!! Bid Adieu to '22 (TV Edition)

I Saw This (double exclamation point) is our feature wherein Kent (me) or Toasty attempt to write about a bunch of stuff they watched some time ago and meant to write about but just never got around to doing so. But we can't not write cuz that would be bad, very bad.  Or, maybe not so bad.  What's the worst that could happen?

---
Parallels - Disney+


I watched Parallels so long ago that it feels like I watched it in 2021.  Is that possible?  (No, it debuted in March).  So far on Disney+ I've not encountered many foreign language D+ "originals", and yet Parallels is a French production, but promoted as a D+ original.  Curious.  

Anyway, the show is a 6-episode sci-fi drama that clearly was inspired by Netflix's smash German time travel mind-fuck, Dark. I was expecting, given this being a Disney production starring teenagers, that this would be a stripped-down drama, one with more teen angst in the Young Adult mode, but to my surprise it doesn't hold back from some heavier emotional implications.  A group of four friends head to an old bunker they've turned into a hang out space, only to get caught in the side-effects of a supercollider experiment.  After the experiment, two of the teens are missing, Bilal and Sam.  Sam's troubled younger brother, Victor, and his crush, Romane, are left behind, unable to explain to their families what happened to the others.  Meanwhile Sam finds himself in an alternate reality where everyone else is gone and a cloud of suspicion surrounds him and Bilal shows up, but a 37-year-old man.  What happens after I've basically forgotten at this point, but I recall being impressed with the mystery while at the same time being completely unable to shake the feeling that this was all familiar territory.  It really did have so many shades of Dark that I couldn't help but compare the two.  Dark was an ambitious multi-season epic that required deep investment into the plot, characters and timelines.  Parallels is a much slimmer affair, to the point that its finale, while providing closure, doesn't seem wholly satisfying to what it built up to.  Then again, with only six episodes, most clocking in between 30 and 40 minutes, there's not a lot of runway to really build up to something big.  

If you haven't seen Dark, this is like an entry level version of it, if you want to test the waters to see if you can both handle the timey-wimeyness of it, as well as subtitles.

---
The Old Man Season 1 - FX


Jeff Bridges and John Lithgow together again, for the first time?  Without doing a minimum amount of research, it seems like Bridges and Lithgow should have been in a whole string of movies together and that this series was a marked "reunion" of the two.  Kind of like how Heat brought DeNiro and Pachino together for the first time, but it seemed like the two had been acting in films together for years.  Anyway, the Old Man should have been EVENT television, but we're in a serious golden age of TV, an abundance of riches, and as such, this union of two massive acting talents kind of fell under the radar.

The Old Man finds Bridges as an old time operative who has been operating off the radar for a very, very long time.  But, just because he's been carefully working in the shadows doesn't mean that people aren't still looking for him.  When his current guise is compromised, he runs, and winds up sheltering as a border with Amy Brenneman.  The two have a bit of a thing, but when she's threatened by her association with him, he essentially kidnaps her to keep her safe.  This dynamic is the most potent, as well as the most difficult aspect of the series.  Bridges genuinely likes her and is affectionately trying to keep her out of harm's way, but at the same time Brenneman is completely at his mercy in a very much damned-if-you-do/damned-if-you-don't way.  But, she also proves herself adaptable with her own level of cunning and shrewdness and I do quite love how her story plays out.  Meanwhile, we learn about Bridges' daughter (Alia Shawkat) who is his inside man at the CIA, working directly under Lithgow as his protege, and close family friend.  There's definitely conflicted emotions in all of that that do get explored rather nicely.

And then, this whole time, we're thinking "The Old Man" is Bridges, or possibly both Bridges and Lithgow, but no...they were both working together for a time under The Old Man (Joel Gray) who is both above and beyond the normal pecking order of operations in the world of espionage they exist in.  Add to the mix a hitman and his handler (Gbenga Akinnagbe, Ecko Kellum) who have their orders and their own objectives, and it all swirls into a grand mess of who's-really-in-charge and what's-the-real-threat.  It's a twisty, exciting, gripping series that would maybe have been tighter as a film, but it's never a bad time with either of its two leads on the screen (it keeps them apart for the bulk of the first season, save for a scintillating phone call or two, so that when they do eventually come together it feels like a suitably massive moment).  
---

The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power Season 1 - Amazon Prime 

I tried reading The Lord of the Rings once.  I got bored very, very quickly.  I've watched Peter Jackson's films a couple times.  I do get bored, frequently, watching those (most of The Two Towers holds my attention, though).  I skipped The Hobbit films, because I knew if I found the LOTR trilogy boring with all the intricate details from Tolkien's books filling out the world, that a trilogy based off one much slimmer book would be dicey viewing.  I was not at all excited for The Rings of Power, if based on Tolkien's works at all, it'd be loosely off the materials collected and expanded upon posthumously.

But, the wife, she likes her fantasy.  And there's the curiosity factor of seeing Bezos put his money where his nerdy heart lives, putting a billion dollars into a season of television like a man for whom money has lost all meaning.  So I watched The Rings of Power and found myself...surprisingly...invested.  Where others, for valid reasons and for toxic ones, have found LOTR:ROP unwatchable, I actually looked forward to that hour every Friday where I would be transported to Middle Earth, watching hobbits and orcs and dwarves and elves explore their religious beliefs, call into question their societal tenets, confront their prejudices, all in the name of quests, quests, quests.  Like the slow sci-fi of Andor, this is slow fantasy, taking its time, exploring its world, the people that live in it, and how they live in it.  How they choose to accept or defy the order of things.  I thought, based on the trailers, that LOTR:ROP would be populated by a cast of not-ready-for-primetime-players, the type of fantasy cast you'd see on the syndicated productions like Xena or Hercules but I was surprised there too.  They may not be big names or recognizable faces, but they are talented, attractive people who buy into the world, and make it all come to life.  And jesus, do they ever look great doing it.  The sets, the costumes, makeup, hair, armor, weapons, decor, all of it is to.the.nines.  It's gorgeous, and the razzle dazzle of an opulent production does go a long long way.  Do I remember a single character's name?  No.  But I can picture the whole season pretty vividly in my mind.  As much as I can get bored by fantasy, I really did like every story in this (but the stuff with the dwarves was my favourite).  Your mileage may vary.
---

She-Hulk: Attorney At Law Season 1- Disney+


I really dig She-Hulk as a character. Since John Byrne's meta-adventurous run in the late 1980's with the character, Jen Walters has been mainly positioned as a fun character in the Marvel Universe.  Before Deadpool was addressing his audience in the comics, She-Hulk was breaking the fourth-wall, but not in an imp-ish way that other comedic characters would in comics.  She-Hulk's adventures still mattered, still had stakes, but there was a narrative device, and an injection of Looney Tunes into the proceedings that really made her title stand out.  The 20 years later, the Charles Soule run of She-Hulk, on which the TV show is loosely riffing on, focussed on Jen as a lawer, and on making a workplace sitcom set in a law office and courtrooms, basically a superheroic Ally McBeal, with only a minimal amount of fourth wall breaking.

I was really into the idea of a She-Hulk TV show, especially with Orphan Black's Tatiana Maslany in the lead (she was outstanding in that show, and having heard her on comedy podcast, knew that she could more than handle a sitcom leading role).  But then the trailer came out, the one with the unfinished Shulkie, and the trailer wasn't selling the comedy very well either.  I was nervous.  And that nervousness bled through to watching every episode, week-by-week, and it never let up.  I was not relaxed watching the show the first time around, and I was nitpicking it to death, to the point that I had convinced myself that it was a show that tried too hard and failed.

But, I gave it a second shot, binged it in one sitting, and found myself absolutely delighted almost every moment.  Knowing what was going to happen, knowing who the players were, not anticipating any surprises, taking myself out of MCU-SPECULATION-MODE (which is a horrible place to be sometimes) and just sitting back with the show, it's super-duper fun. It's really not trying too hard.  It successfully negotiates adapting the character, adapting the Soule run, integrating different aspects of the MCU, introducing new aspects to the MCU, playing with the fourth wall, and getting more than a few laughs every episode, while also investing you in the character and her journey in a big-budgeted sitcom kind of way.  It's impressive.  Sure, not every scene with She-Hulk looks perfect.  It's a tough effect to pull off even on a heightened Marvel TV budget, but, once you're used to it, it's mostly good enough for now.  I mean, do I have the hots for the big green lady?  What I think is the biggest contributing factor She-Hulk brings to the MCU is sexuality.  With the exception of Tony Stark's more lecherous tendencies in the early Iron Man movies and a tepid love scene in the Eternals, sex is almost never acknowledged in the MCU, but here Jen is sexually active, and sexually proactive. In perhaps my favourite turn of events, she wheels Matt Murdock (so great to see Charlie Cox again, and playing the character in a lighter capacity) who then is the next morning seen doing the walk of shame barefoot in his Daredevil costume, boots in hand.  My favourite single moment of the series (it makes no logical sense, but it's still brilliantly executed).  It's great fun, with a great cast (love Ginger Gozaga and Josh Segarra, and Patty Guggenheim's Madisynn is the ultimate scene stealer), and lots of epic moments all pointedly fun.  I went from thinking this was maybe not good to now thinking it's maybe the best Disney+ Marvel show.  Can't wait for more, but also can't wait to watch it again.

---
Lego Masters Season 3 - Fox
Lego Masters Australia Season 1&2 - Discovery
Lego Masters UK Season 1 - AmazonPrime


I've written about Lego Masters a few times now on the blog, and I'm unabashedly a fan of the show.  The third season of the North American version, hosted by Will Arnett, I was so excited to watch week to week, and I was bursting with Canadian Pride as we had a few very strong teams in competition this year.  What I genuinely like about the show is how, despite being a competition, the competitors clearly begin to bond with each other over time and there's a real sense of comraderie between them, as well as the judges (Lego certified builders Amy and Jamie) who clearly respect the talent as well as the people.   Some of the challenges this year included building life-sized dogs for a dog show, playable mini-golf holes, recreating a Marvel scene, and building a workable water fountain.  After the first four or so teams are eliminated it becomes pretty clear who the top teams are, yet there are still surprises that happen, technical failures that were unpredictable that can sink even the most talented team.  As always, the editing format of the show can be grating.  I HATE that the show opens with a preview of the show, teasing the challenge and which teams might be having trouble with them, rather than just letting the show play out, and I also, direly, detest the cut to commercial when something dramatic is about to happen and the 30 second replay when it comes back from commercial.  It's maddening.  As well, the editing of the timing so that we hear Arnett call out how much time is left, but it's clear when it cuts to different teams and their builds, it's not aligned with the actual time.  I don't appreciate the deception for "dramatic storytelling purposes".

Which is just one of the reasons why Lego Masters Australia has proven to be the superior entry of the Lego Masters franchise.  Lets get this out of the way, the first season of Lego Masters Australia was a bit of a gong show, with some of the participants being way, way down the talent ladder compared to what we'd seen on Lego Masters in North America for 3 seasons. But Season 1 of LMAus also pre-dates Lego Masters in North America by 2 years so it really set the template for how the show should run and I bet at that time the Lego Community was maybe a little dubious about a talent show of Lego building.  The second season of LMAus, though, wound up with three teams in the final that produced a build that could have bested the winners of any of the three seasons of LM in North America, so it was a huge step up for season 2.  

What makes LMAus stand out, though, is its host, comedian Hamish Blake.  Where Will Arnette's on-screen personality is full of fake ego and braggadocio that kind of keeps him at a bit of a distance from the competitors, Hamish is utterly boyish and playful, frequently doing bits with, and around, the competitors.  Blake also does a talking head confessional to the camera (something Arnett doesn't really do) and really brings a hugely comedic aura to the show (it's no wonder he's won awards for his hosting of the show) that is infectious.  The show's format also is different, and took a bit of getting used to, but I like it more.  Rather than 10-12 teams starting off, the show only starts with 8 teams.  They do an initial, non-elimination build to compete for the "golden brick" (which the team can use at a later date for immunity from an elimination challenge), then they do a build for which the winner gets to skip the next elimination build, and then it's only on the third build that a team gets eliminated.  This way we get to see each team produce at least 3 builds before one is eliminated.  It's more focussed on the talent than the competition this way, and I do love it.  Also with the smaller starting roster it lets the teams develop their sense of camaraderie with each other faster, and we as an audience get to know them more easily.  The first season had one team with a super-talented but utterly maddening, ego-centric twerp that pushed around his partner who went maddeningly deep into the show, which fuelled the show when maybe the builds weren't as strong as we're used to.  Season 2 had a lot of surprises, including an underwater build, and designing a brand new Star Wars ship, among others, which really pushed the challengers to pretty amazing heights.  The finale of Season 2 was easily the best of the 3 North American and 2 Australian series.  I'm eagerly awaiting the domestic release of seasons 3 and 4.

Less exciting was Lego Masters UK.  The format of the show is decidedly different, at 4 episodes the first season.  Though I should stipulate that Season 1 predates even the first season of LMAus it's still wild how drastically different the show is.  Starting with a roster of 48 teams, quickly winnowed down to 8, and then eliminating two more in the first episode, it's a dodgier talent pool than the first episode of LMAus.  Like, two teams of kids under 12 made it through to the top 8.  It seemed clear to me that this was an early prototype for the Lego Masters format, and there wasn't much figured out, in terms of how they wanted to present the show, who they wanted to have on the show, and what the target audience was.  It's structured like a tepid British all-ages documentary, with the host narrating what's going on and providing lame puns as transition points.  It borders on painful.  The "brick pit" were kind of majestic places in the North American and Australian versions, here, it's all just Rubbermaid towers...so many drawers really making it hard to find things and build fast.  And the challenges were cute, but super short, with 3 hours, or sometimes no prescribed time limit, leading to mostly pedestrian builds across three episodes.  The final episode provided the two finalists something like ten days to create their builds, which did lead to some pretty massive displays, and they were pretty nice, but I couldn't help but wonder what any of the top three teams from any of the other LM  series would have done with 10 days of building time.  There's a two more seasons of LMUK floating out there (I'm hoping they improve the format but if they didn't it's probably why there's only 3 seasons) and apparently 3 seasons of a Dutch LM series (which looks to be more in the NA/Aus format)

---
For All Mankind Season 1 - AppleTV+


As far as streaming services go, AppleTV+ has the hardest time selling me on their wares. I've been hesitant to explore what they're offering, if anything because they don't promote what they offer very prominently.  I think of all their shows the only one I recall seeing a trailer for was The Morning Show which only seemed to be selling the idea of Jennifer Aniston, Reese Witherspoon and Steve Carrell, no other indication as to what it was about.  I found Severance (my favourite show of '22) via Adam Scott promoting it on a podcast, and Mythic Quest was trumpeted highly by tv critics during its first season, but not promoted well by Apple.  For All Mankind is something that should have been an easy sell to me and other nerdy based on it being the product of Ronald D. Moore of Battlestar Galactica fame (with Matt Wolpert and Ben Nedivi)...plus, it's sci-fi, in that it presents an alternate history of the space race.  It really starts with the conceit of "what if Russia landed on the moon first?" and takes its cue from there.

The first season rockets through the late-1960s and 1970's, taking a big jump through time and progress every few episodes.  It mixes fictionalized version of real life individuals with wholly new characters fleshing out that the Cold War became a lot more about the Space Race.  Joel Kinneman (Suicide Squad) is the de-facto lead character of the series, playing Ed Stafford, as a fictional Apollo 10 astronaut who orbited the moon, and felt the pull to land, but followed orders instead, costing them the "first man on the moon" status.  Ed and his old guard of astronauts find themselves in a heightened environment, flush with funding and keen to compete to achieve the next great milestone.  From the onset, the idea is that the moon was just the beginning, that Mars is next.  The series has a pretty large cast - astronauts, ground support, administrative, housewives and children.  Shantel VanSanten (The Flash) plays Ed's wife Karen, and at first I judged the role as being a real thankless one, just another stay on the ground, anxiously watching TV cut to as the men do the derring-do, but the role becomes much more that of who's left behind, particularly late in the season when Ed is effectively trapped on the moon base (yep, this season ends with a moon base having been established) and she's having to deal with increasingly difficult situation at home, alone, and make the decision on whether it's good or not for Ed's mental health to know what's happening.  There's also some spotlight roles for female astronauts, with the episode "Nixon's Women" probably my favourite of the series so far, with one wife of an astronaut joining the program (logically, and being pushed through because of her attractiveness, plus the marketability of a husband and wife astronaut crew) and the pleasure of unflappable Molly Cobb (Sonya Walger - Lost) joining the cast full time.  

The first season works so well because of its rapid pace, burning through time and letting the audience keep catching up to them and all the benchmarked changes to the timeline compared to our own.  That tracking of the changes in the realities is probably my favourite part about watching the show, but I also enjoy how grounded and methodical it is, not afraid to just wallow in jargon if it means maintaining the air of authenticity.  It's a good looking show, probably a pretty expensive first season of television.  We've started season 2 which starts with a 10 year time jump, but I found it gets bogged down in petty drama, rather than the exacerbated pace of rocketing through time and teasing out the alternate reality.  We stalled out on it at the half way point but have been encouraged to stick with it for an apparently dynamite season 3.  Will report back.
---

The Resort - Showcase 

I was drawn in with Cristin Milioti (Palm Springs) and William Jackson Harper (The Good Place), as they're two very likeable personalities who I was thinking I should be paying more attention to.  Together in one place is a good a starting point as any.  Very quickly, as Emma and Noah, we're introduced to the idea that their 10-ish year marriage is on unstable foundation.  Emma seems particularly detached and Noah can't seem to get through.  The resort they're headed to is on a tropical island, and Noah hopes it's enough of a break from real life that things can be shaken up.  But I don't think what happens was the kind of shake up he had in mind.  During a quad-runner tour of the island Emma has an accident, spraining her wrist and getting banged up...but she also finds and old Motorola Razr flip phone.  She starts to obsess on its origins and, after locating a power supply and replacement battery in town, finds out that it belongs to a college-aged American kid who disappeared from another resort that was destroyed in a storm 15 years earlier.  Emma convinces Noah to let her investigate things before turning the phone over to the police, and it draws them into something much bigger and more confounding then they could have imagined.

The series jumps back and forth in time, between Emma and Noah's often fruitless and certainly amateur investigation, and Sam (Skyler Gisondo) and Violet (Nina Bloomgarden) meet-cute romance that has the spectre of tragedy looming over it.  Emma and Noah's investigation seems to only do enough to provoke people who thought this story long since forgotten, and the show keeps asking the question does it actually spell danger or does it only feel dangerous?  Then, in the mix of it all, is a third storyline about the mysterious, unhinged Alexsander Vasilakis (Ben Sinclair), owner of the doomed resort, who claims to be a man displaced from time, and his memories are leaking out of his ear.  His friend Baltasar (Luis Gerardo Méndez) is the lynchpin of both timelines.

What's quite wonderful about The Resort is how it upends its status quo every episode.  You're never quite where you think you are with the series, and each episode ends in a way that provides you with no clue as to where its going.  It's not a puzzlebox mystery, so there's no frustration with these pivots, just surprise. The tone of the show shifts as well, from dramatic, to comedic, to suspenseful, to serene and back as it weaves its story, that, slight spoiler, does take a metaphysical turn, but also earns what it asks of its audience.  It knows what its showing is hard to comprehend and its characters reflect that.  And along the way, we get a pretty intense dissection of Emma and Noah's life together, and it's quite affecting.  As well, I was very, very pleased that the show concludes, decisively, at the end of its 8 episodes.  It's a mini-series, not a franchise or left with any dangling loose ends.  It's kind of rare that we get such a concrete and satisfying conclusion to a story.

---
1899 Season 1 - Netflix


Speaking of Dark and puzzle boxes, the creators of Dark return to netfilx with another compelling puzzle box mystery, this time set on a turn-of-the-century ocean liner, with a multicultural, multi-lingual cast, and the ominous disappearance 4-months earlier of a predecessor ship.   Truth told, I had a lot to say about this series when I watched it and started writing about it over a month ago, but a blogging mishap to my words, and enthusiasm to rewrite those word, away

So, in brief, 1899 is a bit of a marvel resulting in part from Netflix's global outreach. There are no less than 6 languages at play on the ship, and there's nearly no storytelling gymnastics at play to try and get all the characters to speak English.  This is a show from German creative team, so if anything, it seems to jump into German a little more often than I expected.  The opening moments of the film are a dream sequence which triggers the puzzle box into motion, but it's only once our Captain makes the unpopular decision to turn off course to see if an emergency broadcast is coming from the missing sister vessel that the mysteries start to unfurl.

What Jantje Friese and Baran bo Odar are so adept at is not just negotiating their puzzle box elements (it's apparent that they learned from Lost's mistakes, and they have the answers to all their mysteries, but also that the mysteries are only important as long as the characters care about them) but in having them service the story and characters, not just fill space with intrigue.  Across 8 episode they blitz through so many of the confounding things they introduce, and at the midway point, they have a massive event that shakes up the cast quite dramatically.  

I was all in on the series right up until the end when we get a reveal that...spoiler...isn't too dissimilar to the ending of the American version of Life on Mars (and that one left a bad taste in my mouth, so it was an unwelcome reminder).  My hope is that, like with Dark, Friese and bo Odar's big reveal in this finale is just another upending of the status quo and our expectations, and that there's an entirely other drama and purpose to come.
---

Atlanta Season 4 - FX


Season 3 of Atlanta, produced during the crest of the pandemic and in Europe took an almost detached form from what Atlanta had been before.  It was almost more of an anthology of detached stories than any sort of serialized production.  I mean, Atlanta has been operating in this mode almost from the beginning, but it sort of forgot about its connections between its characters, and certainly it felt set apart from its titular home city.  Season 4, then, returns home for 10 episodes that, at least in the first half, reach for a more comedic tone, while still doubling down on the surrealism and still steeping itself into the topics that seem to be weighing heavily on Donald Glover's exceptionally talented mind.

There's Earn's going to therapy and making decisions about his future in both career and family, Alfred facing both his own mortality and that of his career's (literally buying a farm), Darius' adventures in trying to return a bad gift or take a spa day in a sensory deprivation tank, Van confronting her parenting skills after taking her daughter to a casting call only to have Lottie get trapped in a crazy-time version of Tyler Perry's Atlanta-based studios.  The only one-off episode is a wild modern-style documentary about "the Blackest movie of all time: A Goofy Movie" which is as compelling as it is fake, which is to say completely.

With the exception of the very serene, laid back and nonthreatening "Snipe Hunt", Glover and company reach for greater comedic highs, and even greater absurdity than ever before (and they reached pretty high before), and mostly accomplish it.  I enter every episode of Atlanta with a pit of dread in my stomach, and I need a good 10 minutes with every episode before I know what I'm sort of in for, tone wise.  But at the same time, I've been watching long enough that I know Glover loves a good rug pull.  In the second episode, "The Homeliest Little Horse", the rug pull is one of Atlanta's biggest laughs, but, in typical fashion, one that really makes you think about the implications of it all and make a decision on how much you agree with it.  It's an absolutely fabulous, hilarious, utterly compelling, thought-provoking, frequently challenging show, one that I wish could continue forever, but at the same time one that I know we were lucky to even get 4 seasons of.  Each episode is a mini-movie, often playing with genres, and most are worth coming back to on their own merits, as well as part of the whole.

--- 
Letterkenny Season 11 - Crave


For the past two years, new seasons of Letterkenny have been released on Christmas day, and for the past two years, the wife and I would blitz Letterkenny in its entirety prior to the new season dropping.  I love the show -- I'm a huge fan -- and I do like how connected I am to it as an international success, dripping in Canadiana as it is.  But I have to say, 11 seasons of Letterkenny may be too much in one concentrated dose.  I'm so familiar with the first 7-8 seasons that I know most of the beats (but by no means all the jokes) by heart.  The more recent seasons, 9 and 10, are a little more mysterious, as I've only seen them once or twice prior, and then the new season, bingeing all 6 episodes at once, becomes a bit of an overload.  As my wife and I slip into Letterkenny-isms throughout the month of December -- telling each other to "figger it out" or "pull your finger outta your ass" or "skoden" -- it becomes to much to take in the new things, to properly absorb the new content in any meaningful way, to the point that I start to wonder if the new content isn't maybe not as up-to-snuff (up-to-schneef?) as prior seasons.

Did I laugh at Season 11? Heartily. But, because the latest season is so overpowered by my entrenched familiarity of what came prior, it doesn't feel as good, it doesn't yet feel a part of the whole.  Is it just that? Or is there something, maybe, lacking about an episode that spends its time debating which Old Dutch potato chip flavour is its best (especially when All-Dressed, the most Canadian chip of all, is excluded from the running).  It's kind of an one-note joke that has peaks and valleys within, but it's only elevated by the "what the actual fuck is going on here" questioning of an outside party stepping into the proceedings.  

Prior seasons in the middle would end with a bit of a little emotional cliffhanger, whether it's Wayne getting suckerpunched by another local bruiser, Tanis beckoning Wayne to the barn, or that Marie-Fred moment (or that other Marie-Fred moment). The past two seasons have been missing that little end-note cue to wonder about when the show returns, that little character moment to contemplate the implications of.  This season has a runner of Wayne helping out a local degen who wants to turn over a new leaf, but ends with a very melancholy failure to do so, and it's a kind of heaviness the show's never had before that maybe almost breaks its reality.  It points out a sort of in-world, small-town justice system that calls into question the whole order of things (Stuart telling Wayne about the rumours Jivin' Pete was spreading when he was buying drugs off him makes Stuart complicit in Jivin' Pete's drug addiction, and it's odd that Wayne doesn't do anything about that, more over is seen hanging out with the skids on a regular basis).

I'm probably overthinking it. Someone needs to tell me to pull my finger outta my ass.
---

His Dark Materials Season 3 - HBO


My final viewing for '22: the finale of this adaptation of the Philip Pullman His Dark Material trilogy.  It ends a long way away from where it started, and it feels like it's grown up so much, in part because of the bigger break between seasons as a result of the pandemic which means young Lyra (Dafne Keen) and Will (Amir Wilson) have visibly grown out of childhood and into young adults.  It also is much heavier, more head-on in its critique of blindly following religious leaders and treating stories literally. The series has been leading to a literal war between heaven and Earth, but it posits Heaven and Hell as just other dimensions, angels and demons as just other forms of beings unlike our own, but still struggling with the same quandaries we all do.  

As it builds and builds towards an epic confrontation, its a story that's constantly taking a step back to look at its characters and the context of the situation, and how it's shaping them, it's a series that wants us to think of the past as we consider the future, to look at how we've changed as people before we decide that others cannot change.  It's a series that sends the message of live life, be curious, explore, but do good when you can and be mindful of what harm you are capable of.  There's not explicitly an anti-war stance, but it clearly is a story that embraces love and peace as answers far more than fighting and death.

My favourite aspect of the story is the idea of us each having our own death, a spirit so to speak that follows us from our birth, and knows us like no other.  When our time comes, we meet our death, and reflect on life as they move us to the next stage of existence.  That next stage, in Pullman's worlds, can be a number of things, but ultimately it's a return to everything, becomeing one with it all.  Dust.  It's much the same conceit as in the finale of The Good Place and this connection between the two series made me feel all sorts of warm tinglies.

I worried about the third-season yips with HDM, that the series would be hamstrung by declining viewership and tightening budgets, but there was clearly an investment that was made by HBO and they delivered where it mattered most.  The world of Mulefa, and it's elephantine inhabitants really came to life on an impressive scale, and the angelic battle in the sky was stunning in its presentation.  Though I haven't read the books, but I understand the reputation they have now.  

I Saw This!! Bid Adieu to '22 (Movie Edition)

I Saw This (double exclamation point) is our feature wherein Kent(me) or Toasty attempt to write about a bunch of stuff they watched some time ago and meant to write about but just never got around to doing so. But we can't not write cuz that would be bad, very bad.  Or, maybe not so bad.  Enh, whatever. It's what we do.

---

Fire Island (2022, d. Andrew Anh - Disney+)

Gay romance is still a burgeoning force in mainstream media, and one that it seems Hollywood is still only backing with trepidation, as if they don't truly believe there's an audience for it.  Recent years have seen a few big moves, with Love, Simon, and Call Me By Your Name, and holiday romances like Dashing in December, Single All the Way and Happiest Season. But this year the torch has been lit for gay romcoms with the theatrical release of Billy Eichner's Bros and Fire Island being released on Disney+.  

Fire Island shot out like a signal flare announcing the arrival of comedian Joel Kim Booster as a force to be reckoned with.  Writing and starring in this wreckingly funny and fiercely gay romantic comedy that takes its inspiration from Pride and Prejudice, no less, Booster draws from his own emotional well for his portrayal of Noah, the super-hot underemployed late-20something himbo who is still figuring out his place in the world.  With his regular gang of multicultural friends, they take their annual trip to the Fire Island Pines only to discover that it may be their last trip as they know it.  Noah makes it his mission to get his best friend Howie (Bowen Yang) laid, and vows not to have sex until he does.  Meanwhile he keeps having heated run-ins with Will (Conrad Ricamora) who is a very successful individual with poor social skills, and while the personality clashes is what draws them to each other, the class differences keep coming between them.  

Booster commands this film from moment one, with voice-over narration, with his body, and everything in between.  He's in full control of Noah, attempting to act dumber and more vacuous than he is because it lessens the expectations others have for him, and by proxy what he expects for himself. Yang's Howie is riddled with self-consciousness made worse by his utterly shredded and confident BFF not understanding the differences between them.  That they're both Asian-American and gay has its own deeply rooted impact on their senses of selves and, despite being a commonality, they deal with the prejudice and the complex it manifests quite differently.  Fire Island is exceptionally smart and insightful, with richly drawn characters, and explosively funny situations that never get too unbelievably outlandish.  I quite loved it.

---
The Conjuring (2013, d. James Wan - Tubi)


I knew James Wan from his incredibly proficient and joyously outlandish Aquaman and Furious 7, but I had kind of passed over his horror stuff (I think I watched Saw in bits and pieces once).  But after last year's very, very wild Malignant, I realized that maybe Wan's horror keyed more into a comic-book sensibility than a grue and gore one.  A friend had been trumpeting the greatness of the Conjuring series and I made a point to catch the first one once it hit a streaming service again (who knew that would be Tubi).  Long story short, I liked it immensely.  

Wan's incredibly smart set-up for the film builds a whole universe around paranormal investigator couple Ed and Lorraine Warren (Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga) and he wants you to be aware of it.  They have a past, they have a "treasure room", they have traumas, and they have a child which makes them vulnerable.  Lorraine has some form of clairvoyance which is more burden than superpower.  They are sought out by a family experiencing increasingly bizarre and threatening phenomena in their new farm home, including the seeming possession of their daughter. 

The film is as much a procedural as it is a horror film.  It follows the family and really leans into the intensity of the spooks and chills they experience, but it's the Warrens, their process, their crew, their affiliation with the police and their challenging of the evil that engaged me the most.  It taps into a more grandiose look at the supernatural that feels especially heightened, as if the Warrens were John Constantine's parents or something.  Even though I know a whole massive franchise of films had already been built out of this one film, one could sense that there were a whole franchise of films ready to be built out of what Wan constructed here.  Pretty great.

---

RRR [aka Rise, Roar, Revolt] (2022, d. S.S. Rajamouli - Netflix)

One of the complaints levelled against Black Panther and its sequel is that for all its anti-colonialism stance, there's not really actually any fighting and/or killing of white oppressors.  RRR, the epic international smash hit action film from India, has no such qualms.

The most expensive Indian-made film yet, RRR is set in the 1920s during the British rule of the Indian subcontinent. A British administrator and his wife (Ray Stevenson and Alison Doody) abduct a young girl skilled at henna from a village for their own private amusement.  The village protector, Khomaram (N.T. Rama Rao Jr.), takes on the mission of retrieving the girl.  The admin is warned of a possible threat, and they task the ambitious officer Raju (Ram Charan) with quashing the threat.  Raju infiltrates some anti-colonialist groups and catches the attention of Khomaram.  The two forge an unlikely friendship, built on lies, but built all the same.

You would think that the film would be leading to Raju's betrayal of Khomaram, but it's really the middle of the second act with Raju's redemption arc rounding out the rest of the act, before leading into an all-out assault on the administrator in the third act, and there's no holding back.

RRR is a big, brassy, playful movie that deals almost exclusively in big swings and going over-the-top.  It is dealing with a particularly fraught time in India's history, and it's dealing with it in a fanstatical way, a way that is more than just revisionist history, it's superhero fan fiction.  The action goes huge, beyond insane a times, circling past ridiculousness and back into awesome territory.  But it's also a heart-swelling, chest-thumping good-guys-vs-bad-guys story that's really quite simple to get behind, and yes, the pink skins are without a doubt the bad guys that you actively are rooting against.  That the bromance is so loaded with homoerotic undertones is just kind of a bonus, with no painful machismo trying to disguise it.  These two men love each other, and will go to such extremes for one another.  It's a romp.  

---

Fighting With My Family (2019, d. Stephen Merchant - Amazonprime)

Prior to being cast as the new Black Widow, I didn't really know Florence Pugh from a hole in the ground.  I hadn't really taken note of her in anything in particular and didn't really have much of an opinion on her replacing Scarlett Johansson (except to say that as thoroughly decent a job as ScarJo did as Black Widow, I still never quite felt she sold the "most dangerous woman on the planet" vibe).  Smash cut past a couple appearances as Yelena in Black Widow and Hawkeye and Midsommar, I can say I'm quickly a fan.  She is an incredibly compelling actress, always working on multiple different levels at the same time.  She's an incredibly physical performer, as well as one of the most expressive actors of her generation.

Even still, a WWE-produced wrestling biography?  Sure, it's got a pretty great cast (with Nick Frost and Lena Hedy as the British wrestling family patriarch and matriarch), and yeah, Stephen Merchant has proven himself over and over as a smart, funny writer (if not as known for his directing), but why? What makes this story any more compelling than any other wrestler trying to make it?

The answer is, it's got Stephen Merchant at the helm and it stars Florence Pugh.  It's not that this story couldn't have been made without them, but it'd be much less of a thing. It adeptly presents us with a close-knit wrestling family, the resentment that comes as a result of Saraya being picked for WWE training and not brother Zak, and the tribulations one so young has to face leaving home for an entirely new world.  It's a ridiculously cliche-filled tale, but one that has the truth to back it up, making it shockingly fresh.  Pugh just owns the screen every second she's on it, in full command.  It's the movie that made me realize I would watch her in pretty much anything.

(We agree)

---

The Great Race (1965, d. Blake Edwards - Criterion Channel)

Until a few months ago, I wasn't even aware this movie existed.  It's a strange miracle of a production that is quite surely part of an era of cinematic excesses, but results in not another long, sandy Biblical/Historical epic or series of fanciful song-and-dance extravagances, but instead something particularly unique: a living cartoon.  

Many filmmakers have tried over the years to make live action cartoons, mostly by taking a cartoon property and trying to replicate it in live action.  The 90's were rife with these - The Flintstones, Rocky and Bullwinkle, George of the Jungle, Yogi Bear - but none really all that successful, mainly because we have actual cartoons to compare them to.  They're not films that are innovating but rather emulating.

The Great Race was inspired by an actual New York to Paris race in 1908, as well as director Blake's love of slapstick comedy of Laurel and Hardy and the Mark Brothers.  But the result feels less like an homage to cinematic classic comedy than the live action embodiment of Jay Ward Productions cartoons (The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show).  Jack Lemmon plays, Professor Fate, a literal moustache-twirling mad scientist villain in the Snidely Whiplash mold, with Peter Falk playing the more sensible, yet dutiful sidekick, Max.  Everything Professor Fate and Max do is to get the better of his rival, The Great Leslie, which finds Tony Curtis at his most square-jawed, draped in the whitest of whites, the most manicured nails and primped hair, and a smile that literally gleams.  The Great Leslie is the epitome of the cosmopolitan hero, the flawless man, an adventurer so great at adventuring he never gets dirty.  It's clear why Professor Fate hates him so, but Fate's every effort to undermine Leslie backfires on him in spectacular fashion.  So rather than attack him directly yet again, he sets out to best him at his own game, by beating him in a race around the world.  I think worse for ware is Leslie barely even notices Fate, so all of Fate's actions tend to come across as a desperate cry for attention.

This battle of machismo is interrupted by Natalie Wood's Maggie DuBois, who could have just been the token damsel, but Blake and screenwriter Arthur C. Ross make Maggie a modern woman, a suffragette of the era, but also a 60's feminist, drawn in the mould of Nora Charles, a woman who can talk her way into (and out of) pretty much anything.  Maggie is an aspiring reporter who talks her way onto the newspaper staff, and just as quickly onto the assignment of covering The Great Race by entering herself into it, and then managing to still carry on when she quite reasonably shouldn't continue.  

The race takes the quartet of Leslie, Fate, Maggie and Max (as most of the other competitors do not last long) to curiously entertaining places, and, at one point, forces them to all come together to survive on an ice floe when crossing from Alaska to Russia.  The film is perhaps over-extended by its third act, making a detour in the small European kingdom of Carpania, where the perpetually soused crown prince (Jack Lemmon in a second, utterly delightful role) is plotted against, as his backstabbing consorts seek to use Fate's uncanny similarity to undermine the crown. It's at once an utterly unnecessary yet thoroughly entertaining diversion in this 2 1/2 hour film, one that culminates in a ludicrously epic technicolor pie fight (you might be thinking "you've seen one pie fight, you've seen them all"...trust me, if you haven't see this pie fight you just don't know how epic a pie fight can get).

I watched Star Wars about 100 times as a kid.  Had I known about The Great Race I probably would have watched it just as much.   It's a delight from moment one (perhaps the funniest credits sequence besides Monty Python and the Holy Grail) and features a delightful Henry Mancini score.

---
He Laughed Last  (1956, d. Blake Edwards - Criterion Channel)

While I've never been much of a fan Edward's various Pink Panther movies, after the joy of The Great Race I thought I'd second visit into Blake Edwards territory.   He Laughed Last is one of his earliest films, and at 75 minutes, it feels interminably long, an elastic of an idea stretched as far as it can go, neither breaking nor returning to shape.

Who is this film's protagonist? The first 20 minutes are completely stolen by Big Dan (played by Fred Flintstone himself Alan Reed) who dies way too soon.  He bequeaths his criminal empire to Rosie (Lucy Marlow), who was just a showgirl at the club Big Dan took a liking to.  This puts her at odds with dopey wannabe mobster Max (Jesse White) who has aspirations of his own.   We spend far too much time with Max and his lame scheming to the detriment of making much of a character out of Rosie, the ostensible protagonist, 

That Rosie gets left all of Big Dan's estate makes thing difficult with her cop boyfriend Jimmy (Richard Long). But we don't really get much hijinks of out-of-her-depth Rosie trying to run the mob operation, most of her scenes deal with her toxic relationship with Jimmy...such a bad relationship.

Marlow is delightful as Rosemary in a turn-on-a-dime performance where she goes from ditsy to swooning to tough-talking in seconds. It would have been far better were the film more focused on Rosie and we could have gotten more Marlow. It's pretty hollow otherwise.  It feels every inch like a studio-demanded production: "We've got this girl Marlow that we want to make a star, but we don't trust her yet, so don't focus too much on her.  Build the picture around her, but let our stable boys like Reed and White do all the heavy lifting  We got this crooner, Frankie Laine signed up, but he's a crap actor, but the dames love his, so make sure he's in here, but mostly singing, not talking.  Bring it in over 70, but under 80, you got two weeks."

---

Damn Yankees (1958, d. George Abbott and Stanley Donen - Tubi)

You know, Damn Yankees is one of those titles that has been circling around me my whole life, but I never really stopped to inquire about it. I kind of knew it was a movie that may or may not have been derived from a musical, or stage production of some kind.  I think I assumed it was about the Civil War, but I just didn't know.

I've gotten more appreciative of musicals in general and having explored Bob Fosse's repertoire this past year, I was curious to see Gwen Verdon in the flesh (as opposed to being portrayed by Michelle Williams), so I dove into Damn Yankees and was shocked to find it was a basesball musical about a deal with the devil.  I honestly didn't see that coming at all.

It's a trifle of a story, a flittering whimsy about wish fulfillment. An average middle-aged schlub, Joe Boyd (Robert Shafer) is tired of seeing his beloved Washington Generals lose and so he makes a deal with the devil (Ray Walston) to become the pro-slugger that he always wished he could be, and he's turned into the young, strapping, toe-headed Tab Hunter, under the guise of Joe Hardy. In doing so, he leaves his "old girl", his wife Meg (Shannon Bolin) behind.

He has immediate and massive impact on the success of the Generals, fame and glory are his, but he starts to miss his "old girl", and goes back to see how Meg is doing. Joe's pining for his "old girl", who he made an armchair widow neglecting her for basesball 6 months out of every year, threatens his deal with the devil, and so the devil sets his right hand temptress, Lola, on Joe.  Meg, meanwhile, seems to have no inner life.  Her husband just up and disappeared and she's just putting up a brave front.  Then when Joe Hardy, the new most famous person in town comes and rents a room from her, neighbours begin to talk (if only the story delved into actual conceits of infidelity, with Joe being tempted by Lola, or Meg being very attracted to young Joe....)

But Joe is a good old boy, and in the end, he doesn't want his dreams, just the comfort of the woman he loves, leading to a most bizarre final shot of Shafer and Bolin embracing while behind them Walston jumps up and down in a tantrum that is direly undignified.

The story doesn't really delve too deeply into any internal conflict.  It's not really a look at "settling down" or "lost dreams" or the "seven-year-itch" or any of that.  It doesn't really ever let Joe revel in his successes, and it never lets us even imagine that he's going to stick with his new life. Almost immediately he wants to return to his old one.  He's not even really tempted by Lola, and the production has to do a lot of summersaults in order to make you think the devil might actually win.

I didn't really care for any of the songs (though it was good to finally put classics like "(You Gotta Have) Heart" and "Whatever Lola Wants" in context) and the dancing (for someone who doesn't have much appreciation for it) was fine, sometimes really great (particularly during Two Lost Souls).  Yet, despite my griping, I did quite enjoy it.  Verdon, a handsome woman with a dynamic form and huge presence, is easily the stand-out performer of the piece.  I just think there's more possibility in the story than was actually executed.  

---

Confess, Fletch (2022, d. Greg Mottola - rental)

It's been a long, long road to getting a new adaptation of Gregory Macdonald's "Fletch" series, with many, many false starts (I recall a Kevin Smith-helmed, Jason Lee-starring Flech being positioned back in the early 2000's).  Much of the old Chevy Chase Fletch has aged poorly, and Fletch Lives was always an abomination (like 20 novels to adapt and they went with an original story?)

But a new feature from Superbad and Adventureland's Greg Mottola starring Jon Hamm in the title role seems like a natural, sure-fire can't-lose starter to a new, better run of Fletch movies.  However, the studio behind it, Miramax (wait, that still exists?), via Paramount, did very, very little to promote the film.  I only heard about it from Jon Hamm appearing on a podcast.  And by all accounts it sounds like Paramount even buried the film on their Paramount+ streaming service.  It's baffling as to why there was so little confidence in the film.  Did nobody at Paramount watch it?  It's great!

Confess, Fletch is one of the most delightful movie experiences of 2022, with Jon Hamm playing the overconfident, utterly affable Irwin M. Fletcher, former investigative reporter-turned-golddigger/private investigator. He arrives at his rental home in Boston only to find a dead body in the place.  With all the casualness of ordering a pizza, he calls the police (not 9-11) and informs them that a crime has been committed, and he grabs a drink, takes his shoes off, and puts his feet up and waits.

Hamm is a devastatingly handsome man which is only made more potent by his lack of ego and unfailingly playful comedic personality (he's been very entrenched in the L.A. comedy scene for decades, despite not being a comedian, improviser or sketch performer himself).  He's had some incredible comedic turns playing vainglorious idiots and clueless buffoons in Bridesmaids, 30 Rock and The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, but no role has seemed so perfect for him to capitalize upon everything he brings to the table as Fletch.  Hamm's Fletch struts around the world not as if he owns it, but as if he's immune to it.  He's teflon, and nothing bad can ever stick to him.  He thinks himself clever, and he is, just not as clever as he thinks he is, to the point that for all his swirling machinations in Confess, Fletch none of it actually truly matters, and even his solving of the crime is more about his refusal to not interfere in things than it is his deductive ability.  Fletch skates through life as an only a super-handsome white guy can, on a cloud of unearned privilege that gives him the benefit of the doubt...or would have 30 years ago.  Today, Fletch is challenged about his privilege at every turn, though he barely clocks it.  He's not an offensive product of white privilege, as he does, for the most part, try to use it for good, yet Mottola is very savvy in how the lens captures the world's around Fletch's awareness of it.

 On top of being so, so good looking, Hamm is also aging without fear, and even that is brought into his performance of FletchHe's too old to relate to the youth, but not too old as to not try.  His position as a post-Boomer/pre-Gen Xer means he's not old enough to be given a free pass for his transgressions against a changing society, but he's also old enough to not be self conscious about it.  It's like he knows the world is still his oyster, he may never get the pearl, but it's always going to be in view.  

I loved Confess, Fletch.  It's not changing the face of cinema, nor attempting to, but it's just massively entertaining, and simply so, without big pyrotechnics or chase sequences or special effects.  It coasts entirely along based off great performances from Hamm, Marcia Gay Harden, Roy Wood Jr., Annie Mummalo and more, weaving a convoluted mystery that is not meant to be solved so much as unraveled.  We need at least another half dozen of these please.

---

Alice, Sweet Alice [aka. Communion aka Holy Terror] (1976, d. Alfred Sole- Xumo)


This was a recommendation from the Roger Avery/Quentin Tarantino podcast Video Archives during their assessment of "American Giallo" (American films that best emulate the Italian hyper-violent murder-mysteries made famous by Dario Argento and Mario Bava)

Once you get past the awkward timing of nearly every scene, there's a rather gripping murder-mystery/suspense thriller here that starts with a child's murder for which another child is blamed. I knew going in that titular Alice wasn't the murderer, but I think if you went in cold, it would only be the first act, at most, that you would suspect Alice of the crime. There really wasn't a bigger plan here to deceive the audience. 

The actual murderer is revealed at the end of the second act, which then spends time with them, givings us some insight into who they are and why they're doing what they're doing. It's a little disjointed from act to act, as the focus shifts from one character to the next, and sadly Alice is pretty much gone from the film's second half, but somehow it all hangs together quite well. 

There are some surprising attacks and murders, and that great, soupy, bright red 70's blood is put to great effect (a great overhead shot of a body laying in the gutter as rain pours down, the blood pool expanding rapidly in the wetness. Director sole may not have been able to draw the most natural performances out of his actors, nor edit the film smoothly, but he knows where to put the camera.   This film revolves a lot around the church, and I don't quite grok the exact message  (except to say that religion creates murderous zealots) but it's obviously not one that thinks highly of Catholicism.