Showing posts with label princess. Show all posts
Showing posts with label princess. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 22, 2023

3 Short Paragraphs (Or Not): The Princess

2022, Le-Van Kiet (The Ancestral) -- download

Download? This was a Hulu/Disney+ movie!! But where is it? WTF Disney, why are you cleaning house of the movies I never got around to watching yet? It was only there a year !!

I was in the mood for a "fantasy movie", i.e. something with swords and pseudo-medieval worlds, not necessarily with magic or monsters but something in the D&D vein. This one about a faerie tale princess who turns the tables on her captors fit the bill quite well.

And I liked this movie. It perfectly scratched the itch I had. It also had a rather expeditious nature to it that fit the Wuxia inspired action rather well. There isn't a lot of world building here; we are just dropped in a situation. Princess (no name given) (Joey King, Bullet Train) awakens, groggy, in manacles, locked in The Tower. Two leather clad henchmen were sent to check on her, and are probably about to grope her, when she attacks. She's no meek princess and makes quick work of them, while still recovering from whatever overcame her. She kicks ass.

Think reverse-The Raid as The Princess makes her way down the tower defeating enemies and hiding as the circumstances require. As she makes her way, we are given her recollections of the events that got her put there, as well as the requisite background. Good King (no name given) (Ed Stoppard, Knightfall) was about to marry his eldest daughter off to smug nobleman no na....er... Julius (Dominic Cooper, Preacher). He does not have a male heir and feels he has no other options. But The Princess is not traditional in the least, and abandons her betrothed mid-ceremony. In response, Julius takes the castle. And her.

She does not react well to that. Julius does not react well to her daring to rebuff him. But he still feels he has to marry her in order to win the people's hearts. He could just be a plain old usurper, but tradition rules this land. But The Princess has made her choice and all who stand in her way will feel her wrath. And she's a skilled warrior, so even Julius's best and biggest barbarian cannot defeat her.

Its a silly movie, with lots that doesn't make sense outside the faerie tale sub-genre, but it was a lot of fun and Joey King has you rooting for her almost immediately. Oh, it could have used a bit more polish and finesse, but it more than satisfied the desire I had for a "movie with swords".

Sunday, December 4, 2022

KWIF: Enchanted/Disenchanted (+2)

 Kent's Week In Film #3

Enchanted (2007, d. Kevin Lima - Disney+)
Disenchanted (2022, d. Adam Shankman - Disney+)
The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special (2022, d. James Gunn - Disney+)
Reindeer Games Homecoming (2022, d.  - Lifetime)


I rewatched Enchanted as a precursor to watching Disenchanted, and I had forgotten how absolutely delightful the film is from start to finish.  Going back to my original review (8 years ago) I don't have much to add except maybe I enjoyed it even more the second time around.  I knew I enjoyed the picture the last time I watched, it, but so much time had passed it seemed like I was watching it again entirely fresh, and everything seemed just as surprising, funny, and sincere as the last time. Of course, the world has changed since Enchanted was made 15 years ago, and it caused me to consider whether the naifish Princess-to-be Giselle as a variation of the Born Sexy Yesterday trope.

Giselle is naive to our world, because the world she comes from, the magical realm of Andalasia, operates in Disney princess film cliches.  The damning thing about that is the film (and even more so in Disenchanted) sort of postulates that the cliches are the magic, the glue that holds that world together.  Giselle in the real world finds herself in her big, billowy, wedding dress getting in all sorts of innocent scrapes until divorce lawyer Patrick Dempsey's Robert and his daughter Morgan stumble upon her and help her out.   That she's a wide eyed, pretty, strawberry blonde, white woman who seemingly has a 5-year-old's innocent awareness of the world makes her not only not a threat, but kind of an object of attraction, and triggers Robert's white night sympathetic response.   

It is over time that he sees her naivete for what it is, an actual true unawareness of the world he lives in, and what she has is a warmth and kindness that he sees lacking in his legal dealings and his own sense of the world.  His attraction to her is not his ability to teach her about his world, but more about what her view of the world and people can teach him.


Disenchanted
 picks up 15 years later, and finds Giselle, Robert, Morgan and the new baby Sofia finding life to be not-so-happily-ever-after.  The crushing realities of work-life balance, of parenting a newborn, of dealing with teenage hormones, means that life isn't as magical as it once was for Giselle and Robert, and they think that, somehow, a change of scenery is perhaps what they need, as if getting out of the hustle and bustle of New York would fix things.

They wind up in an run-down estate in Monroeville, an already distressed Morgan has a hard time adjusting to the new location and her new school, and the queen bee of the city, Malvina, is very passive aggressive in welcoming her new neighbours.  King Edward and Queen Nancy pay a visit, gifting baby Sofia a magical wand "for a true daughter of Andalasia" to grant them their truest wishes.  After a particularly fraught day, Giselle cant help but wish her life in Monroeville was more like life in Andalasia, and a transformation happens to the town, as it turns into a real-life cartoon, full of song and dance and magic.

Malvina is a real wicked Queen, Robert yearns for a heroic quest, Morgan feels like she can't do anything right, and Giselle finds herself uncontrollably becoming a wicked stepmother. It knowingly plays into all the cliches in a way that its predecessor tried to buck them.  The root of it all though is dissatisfaction one's life, and how even with great love in family and friends, one can still feel like life isn't exactly what it should be.

It's an entertaining production with some really fun songs, particularly the duet/battle between Amy Adams' Giselle and Maya Rudolph's Malvena, but it's unfocussed. The asides of Robert, in his fantasy form, searching for adventure (and being quite terrible at it) are unnecessary.  The same with a subplot about Morgan's maybe having a love interest in Malvina's son, and Morgan's trip into Andalasia seems to serve purpose of getting Idina Menzel as Queen Nancy a song she can belt out for all the Frozen stans (it was one of the big, glaring omissions of Enchanted to have Menzel and not have her sing, and the song she sings here, she really destroys with it, but, sadly, it doesn't do much for the plot at all).

The movie really needed to keeps its focus tight on Giselle and her dissatisfaction with life, perhaps a postpartum depression metaphor even, as well as Morgan's aging out of believing in magic, increasing tensions with her stepmother, and feelings of inadequacy with the new baby being Giselle's true daughter.  Because when that story comes back around and Morgan learns that she is a true daughter of Andalasia, it opens the spigot for the waterworks.

Enchanted though perhaps problematic, is still a flat-out entertaining marvel.  Disenchanted is lesser-than in its entertainment factor, and perhaps even a bit of a misfire at times, yet still not entirely unwelcome in its existence.

---


Toasty did a pretty good summary of The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special, so I won't say too much about what happens, and most of what Toasty said about it, I agree with.  This really is a Christmas special, but "Holiday Special" recalls the Star Wars Holiday Special more, so I see what director James Gunn was going for there.  But I almost wish this was more in the campy vein of the Star Wars Holiday Special, than the straight up Christmastime adventure that it turned out to be.  There were always shows in the 70's and 80's that would do Christmas specials where things would step outside of the usual sit com vibe or hospital drama and do a really different story to deliver, basically, Christmas feels, about caring, and giving, and goodwill towards men, and learning about the spirit of the season.  And that's really what this is.  Rather than the bizarre variety show that was Bruce Vilanch's interpretation of Star Wars, we get a proper Christmas special but with the massive budget of a Marvel production, and its hard to be anything but grateful for that. Plus, it's basically more content with probably the best franchise in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, so I'm doubly thankful for more of that.  I don't know if it will become a holiday staple (I guess it might depend on how GOTG Vol.3 works out), but it'll certainly be fun to return to from time to time.  

---


I've taken a step back from the Christmas/Holiday tv movie romances this year. I watched way too many of these the past few years, and last year kind of broke me.  These holiday movies are rarely good, frequently terrible, and the kind of joy or entertainment I got from the repetition of their cliches has almost fully waned.  This year's Hallmark crop, by all signs, has been endeavouring to break its own mould, but I'm having a hard time mustering up the enthusiasm to really care.  Lifetime seems to be content to continue to colour within the lines, and so we get the pablum of Reindeer Games Homecoming.  Written by and starring Grey's Anatomy's Sarah Drew, she's a science teacher who gave up pursuing her career as a doctor when her father got sick, and got complacent after he passed. She's reminded of what she didn't accomplish when high school flame, and super-hot action star Justin Bruening rolls into town.  The two flirt and hang out and develop feelings, but the old feelings of hurt and sadness get in the way.  All of this is framed around the local town's "Reindeer Games" which are a series of team competitions that the movie doesn't really care about in any real way so neither should the viewer.  This is all played as a lighthearted romance, so there are a couple of decent gags (and a lot of lame ones) but it's all trope-laden, seen-a-thousand-times-before type stuff, and the chemistry is not strong enough to really carry you through.  I've seen a lot dumber versions of this story, but a lot better ones too.  This reminded me why I don't want to watch 40 of these this year. One bad one is one too many.

Sunday, November 28, 2021

A Toast To HallmarKent: The Princess Switch

2018, Mike Rohl (Miss Christmas) -- Netflix

The Draw: 

Well, for pretty simple reasons. We are starting "this thing" up again and now that there is a third of this series on Netflix, I suppose we should watch the second. But I didn't remember a thing about the first AND I never wrote about it.

And because I said I want to watch as many Hallmarkies as I can, where baking is a trope.

HERstory: 

Stacy (Vanessa Hudgens, Polar) lives in Chicago. After a few establishing shots (not true fly in's but general stock bits), we meet her at her bakery. She and her business partner (is assistant baker really called sous chef?), longtime friend Kevin (Nick Sagar, Shadowhunters: The Mortal Instruments) [but not love interest!]. Stacy is still bemoaning the guy who got away, and Kevin is raising his daughter alone after HIS wife ran away. They should have gone with tragic death. Or maybe Paul ran away with Kevin's wife. Moar trauma?

Kevin has signed Stacy up for an overseas competition in Barovia Belgravia. This is just weird. You run a small, but decent shop in Chicago, and are just going to abandon the place during the Xmas season to run away for a prestige competition in Nowhere, Europe? Also, is the competition paying or does she just have the cash lying around? Either way, she initially says "no way" but runs into Paul, the Guy Who Got Away, and his new fiance. Bing! Off to Belgravia we go!

Gawds its gorgeous there! All picturesque, wintry village that just LOVES the winter season. I do miss when winter was more than just the week leading up to Xmas. We need more Winter Fairs, hot cocoa, sleigh rides and tobogganing events. The cottage they give Stacy and Kevin to live in while competing! Its massive. No Motel 8 on the side of the highway coming into town for Belgravia!

Stacy is intense, or driven, as Kevin constantly reminds her. She wants to spend the next few days prepping for the competition, which sounds alright with me considering the spontaneity in which she entered the contest (i.e. she didn't choose it), but Kevin and daughter need to check out the village. I can respect that, but why all the pressure on Stacy? Either way, they end up at the studio (Belgravia seems kind of small town quaint, too quaint to have its own massive studio) where Stacy meets her old school rival, soils her apron, and is forced to go into town to get a new one. Yeah, uh huh, like she doesn't have a dozen around, nor are any provided by the competition?

In town she literally bumps into her doppel -- Lady Margaret Delacourt (Vanessa Hudgens, Spring Breakers) -- who is in Belgravia to marry the Prince Edward (*snicker*). Yada yada yada, "Let's switch places!" Being a Duchess marrying a Prince is tiring, and Margaret needs a break. Despite Stacy having a competition to prep for, she agrees after a bit of bribery - Margaret will get Kevin's daughter into a ballet school summer program. And the Prince is supposed to be going on a trip, so Stacy will get some royal treatment and be back in time for the baking.

Bing! 

Prince's trip gets cancelled, and now Stacy ends up entertaining with Edward. Some ludicrous attempts at horse riding (Peanut Gallery, "Your stinky horse glove in my face! How romantic!") followed by a sleigh ride in a mini skirt, a visit to a local homeless shelter (Peanut Gallery, "Family homeless is a big problem in Belgravia?!?!") followed by a visit to the local toy store to buy toys for children at the shelter. And the Xmas Market, a genuinely lovely looking set piece. Stacy is charming but does not do a very good job at playing Fake Duchess -- you would think Prince Eddie would know something about the country he is marrying into.

Meanwhile Marge is having a grand old time with Kevin and daughter. Daughter does catch on pretty quick but likes Margaret's very free and open attitude, which throws Kevin for a bit, but he likes New Stacy, Stacy-lite, Stacy who is not so intense. They are getting along reaaaal well.

Post switch-back, Stacy and Kevin return to the competition, get slightly sabotaged by a rival (Stacy, "How do I puree my berries without a mixer?" Why wouldn't the competition be held accountable for damaged equipment? Peanut Galley, "How do you puree berries WITH a mixer? You just need a fine mesh strainer and a spoon !") but end up winning anyway. I am so disappointed how a movie about a baker in a baking competition focuses so little on the baking. But at the end of the competition, everyone reveals who each is, and Margaret even reveals she is in love with commoner Kevin!

A year later Stacy marries Prince Edward and they live happily ever after. Well, until the sequels !!

The Formulae:

The thing with these movies from Netflix is that they are NOT Hallmark movies, and despite playing in the same playground, they are more... Disney romcoms than they are truly Hallmarkies. So, we forgive them when they don't have as many of the tropes.

But, we do get quite the lovely Xmas Market, but the montage is a bit of a letdown. The movie does begin with the Prince being a bit of a dick; well, technically his driver, but its a common enough trope that the lead is annoyed at the potential love interest. Oh, and we do get quiiiite the reddish dress when Stacy as Margaret attends a ball. Oh, and the fake snow quotient is through the rooooof.

Unformulae: 

Again, these are the Netflix princess movies where they make their own rules. While there might be some aspects of the tropes in play, they don't stick close to em. Such as the Xmas Ball, this is more just a reason for Prince and Fake Duchess to get to know each other in a romantic Princess Romance Story manner, not at all Xmas Event driven. In fact, very little of the movie is the expected formula, and maybe we need another formula purely for royalty in love flicks? There are probably a good number of THOSE. But I won't be watching them UNLESS they be more Hallmarkie.

True Calling?

There is royalty, and there is switching, so yeah pretty much.

The Rewind: 

There aren't really any truly marvelous scenes to rewatch in this movie, neither ironically or genuinely. But Hudgens does look remarkably fetching in that Royal Ball dress. And her mini skirts. But that's just me. Oh! While not really rewindable, if I commented on it being chuckle worthy in the other Hudgens Hallmarkie, again it is prevalent that characters in this movie watch Netflix, and see the OTHER romantic seasonal movies in the listing, INCLUDING A Christmas Prince which takes place in the country of Aldovia, which we learned is not far from Belgravia. So, is the movie on Netflix a dramatic retelling of a true story in their universe? Or do they have a magical Netflix box?

The Regulars: 

Again, not being a Hallmarkie, it is not going to have many of the roster, BUT Hudgens herself has already been in one of the Netflix pseudio-markies: The Knight Before Christmas.

How does it Hallmark? 

To be honest, it's barely trying. And they are really just trying to make their own pseudo Disney style romantic movie with hijinks and royalty envy.

How does it movie? 

Oh gawd no. Not even as a pseudo Disney style movie.

Of note, I have not caught up with writing about these Netflix Princess romance movies. As there are two popular series, apparently set in the same universe, one starring Rose McIver (A Christmas Prince) which we have ended up hate-watching, as  they are terrible in their own special ways, and THIS series. I am surprised Netflix hasn't launched a third, maybe not Xmas season based.

But I should be writing about them for THIS series. Maybe some rewatches? Maybe not.

Monday, April 5, 2021

3+1 Short Paragraphs: The Princess and the Frog

 2009, d. John Musker and Ron Clements - Disney+

I'm slowly working through both the Princess and Renaissance-era Disney pictures, and not finding a whole lot of joy in most of it.  They don't feel like they were made for me to enjoy.  They never have.  They feel very much like the refined output of a factory that has a specific consumer profile, and hey, more power to those people that they were made for, and do enjoy them.  The straight, white, gen-xer male that I am has, and continues to have, more than enough product targeted at him. But I really like movies, and I like to see things that reach and try to be different.  Pixar came along in the middle of the Disney Renaissance and kind of embarrassed them making Toy Story, A Bug's Life and Toy Story 2 all which appealed to all types of children and parents, feeling contemporary and entertaining in a way that musical princess/romance/fairy tale movies just weren't, and hitting audiences in a way that made Disney seriously question what they were doing.  The course correction away from "girl-centric" features, into non-musical things like Atlantis and Treasure Planet basically sunk both the art form of American-originated hand-drawn animation and the princess story for nearly a decade.  With Disney suddenly under Pixar's influence in the late-aughts (rather than vice versa), The Princess and the Frog was the return, short-lived though it was, but it showed that some lessons had been learned in the intervening years.


From the title alone, The Princess and the Frog is so pointedly an attempt at recapturing the little-girl-princess market, but the story, and how it's told, feel like a distinct deviation. It's a story set in 1920's New Orleans, but it breaks from a lot of the tropes that they had established with The Little Mermaid (another Musker and Clements picture).  Tiana is a hard working young Black woman with a dream she's dedicated to fulfilling: saving her money to open her own restaurant, the same dream her father had but died before he could realize it.  She's self actualized which is quite a refreshing switch for a Disney Princess (which she isn't yet).  The film is also astutely aware of the economic and racial disparity in New Orleans, but only plays at it subtly, not seeking to make the whole affair too uncomfortable.  It's a visiting prince (from a made up, Spanish-ish nation, which gives only the skightest feel of Netflix's live action princess romances) that sets the town abuzz, and catches the attention of Dr. Facilier, the Shadowman, a voodoo priest and trickster. He set into play an overly complicated scheme to acquiring riches to pay down some debts he owes to some very vengeful spirits.  In the process the prince is turned into a frog. Tiana, kisses the frog to help him out of his jam, and turns into a frog herself, and they wind up on the run together.

The film puts the pair on a bayou adventure seeking out a voodoo priestess, and they meet some charming friends along the way, including a trumpet playing gator named Lewis and a creole firefly named Ray who is in love with a star. The quartet and their journey is a lot of fun, like a Pixar movie, putting the audience into a reality that's quite a different perspective on the world... a frog's eye view if you will.  While the romance between Tiana and Prince Naveen feels somewhat forced, it also doesn't feel like the goal the film is trying to get to.  It may be a flaw, or a strength depending on your perspective.  Of course, Tiana becomes a princess by marrying Naveen in the end, thus validating the title of the film.

The film is quite enjoyable but at the same time, there's definitely cultural criticism that can detract from the enjoyment of Disney's first Black princess musical romance, such as the fact that there's a big opening sequence with music from Dr. John, a white jazz musician (he's from New Orleans, I guess is the reasoning here) and that the music and songs of The Princess and the Frog (which are admittedly quite good...I learned Keith David can sing and he's amazing) come from Randy Newman.  It just seems a little off key to include these two figures as the musical representation for this film.  And the exact same criticism leveled against Soul (Pixar's first film with a Black lead character) is somehow apparent in a Disney film released a decade earlier, where the character's visual representation as a Black person on screen is taken away from them. It's kind of astounding that it happened again.  Just like Soul, there is an entertaining product here, but in both cases it just calls out to the fact that maybe in this Millennium you need to originate your stories with Black leads with Black creators.  That's not to say that all stories with Black characters have to be created by Black creators, but if the only Black stories you have are only originating from white creators, that's a real problem that needs addressing.

Monday, December 7, 2020

T&K's XMas (2020) Advent Calendar: Day 7 - The Princess Switch 2: Switched Again

A Toast to Hallmarkent: The Princess Switch 2: Switched Again
 2020, d. Mike Rohl

The Story:

When last we left the Princess Switch, Stacy (the baker from Chicago) was married to Prince Edward making her Princess of Belgravia.  Lady Margaret Delacourt, duchess of Montenero, (Edward's ex-fiancee and somehow identical twin to Stacy) meanwhile had fallen in love with Stacy's business partner Kevin, was adored by his young daughter Olivia, and there was insinuation that he was going to propose.

Well, it's two years on and Stacy has been keeping busy in her princessly duties, too busy in fact, such that Edward is feeling ignored.  Stacy's just so worried about her twin not-sibling Margaret who has, as a result of the death of her uncle, and abdication of her cousin, become Montenero's Queen-in-Waiting.  Because of her new royal responsibility, she and Kevin broke up, and it's causing Stacy to fret.  With the coronation a few days away (on Christmas, naturally), Stacy thinks there's one last opportunity to get Kevin and Margaret back together.

Back in Chicago, at Kevin's bustling, pre-COVID bakery (where Stacy is a silent partner), the goodies are in total demand, and Olivia is child labor working the register.  Kevin (who sports a real beard throughout the whole movie appears to have a fake beard in this scene for some reason) looks like hot garbage, wearing sweatpants and a dumpy sweater to bake in.  He looks unhygenic, quite frankly.  They should have CGIed in flies and stink lines.  Stacy mocks his post-breakup misery and implores him to come to Margaret's coronation.  Just close up your busy shop that is probably the only way you make money and fuck off to royal gaga land (but if you can land a Queen then you don't need to worry about money, so maybe it's a gamble worth taking).  Also, Olivia didn't mail the RSVP declining as her dad had asked her to.

In Montenero, the gang all arrives together, and Margaret's palace is looking pretty drab for almost-Christmas.  The dust covers are still on virtually everything.  So, the gang (and the ample staff of the palace) decorate the shit out of the place.  It's completely overblown and excessive and it looks festive as fuck in there (two "fucks" already, what's up with me today).  Seriously, Margaret's bedroom is more festive than a Santa Claus parade.  Then Margaret and Kevin are left to go make hot chocolate for everyone (and by everyone I mean only the main cast, surely the legion of staff who did the majority of the work get no hot chocolate...hot lemon water at best).  Kevin cracks a joke about how Margaret has probably never even been in this kitchen, and she gets him back by looking in the oven and saying "oh, all the food is gone".  Actor Nick Sagar has to do so much fake laughing and fake enjoyment of trite things in this film...you can see a little bit of his soul die with every smile and half-laugh.  Things escalate when Margaret drops a bag of flour on Kevin's face and it devolves into a "we have servants to clean this shit up" flour fight (where Vanessa Hudgens keeps throwing the flower in Nick Sagar's face but he's obviously been instructed to avoid her makeup and hair because he throws it only at her chest).  

They get a little closer but are interrupted when  Margaret must go see her chief of staff, Count Antonio Rossi, who, you can tell from the first second on screen is a real jag. And most definitely not Italian.  Margaret has known him forever, and now he's making eyes at her, professing his interest in ruling by her side.  Ugh, he's slimy and gross.  But he's an effective approximation of a Disney princess cartoon villain in real life.

At an evening event, Kevin and Margaret start to dance (Kevin: "lets show them how it's done".  End result: nothing at all spectacular), and they have a moment, but they're once again interrupted, this time by Margaret's cousin ("cuzzy"), the posh and flamboyant Lady Fiona Pembroke (Hudgens again).  It was all trite, cliched b.s. trying to get lapsed lovers back together until Fiona shows up, and suddenly the movie (20 minutes in) is laid bare... three Vanessa Hudgens?!?  There's going to be some triple switching happening.

Well yes.  First Stacy wants to switch with Margaret to give her some quality alone time with Kevin, hopefully rekindling the romance.  Margaret is reluctant but Olivia, Frank (Edward's chief aide) and Mrs. Donatelli (Margaret's chief aide) are all on board for the Princess Switch again.  But there's triple trouble, since Lady Fiona is pretty much broke, so she and her two dimwit lackeys (Reggie and Mindy) scheme to switch places with Margaret just long enough for the coronation and to take a respectable half of her fortune before going off to some tropical paradise where there's no extradition treaty.

To fast forward through all of the shenanigans, Edward has a heart-to-heart with Stacy-as-Margaret,  Olivia distracts Edward from the switch with Christmas Eve shopping, Margaret and Kevin build snowmen which is all it takes to profess love for each other again, Fiona switches places with Stacy who she thinks is Margaret, but when Margaret returns to switch back with Stacy, Fiona keeps up the Margaret act and calls her the imposter.  She totally can't believe that worked (nor can anyone watching), as Margaret backs off.  Then Fiona-as-Margaret tells Kevin off and send him packing on a late evening run to the Montenero airport on Christmas Eve, although the weird magical old man from the last movie turns up as the cab driver.  Why? I dunno.  

Anyway, Margaret regroups with Edward, Frank and Mrs. Donatelli (who Fiona fired...on Christmas Eve... after two decades of service... seriously...and there was nothing suspicious about that unprompeted, out-of-character action?  C'mon!) and they plot to rescue Stacy, who kind of escapes on her own, leading to Edward punching out Reggie (with Frank assisting with a well-timed judo chop).  Fiona-as-Margaret encounters Antonio (sigh) and he's onto her right away (she has a damn tattoo on her finger ffs!).  Turns out Antonio, despite being a count, is broke too, so they hatch a scheme to step up the coronation to late Christmas Eve, rob the kingdom blind and he takes a cut.

But they're busted. Antonio gets arrested and Margaret and co rush off to the airport to stop Kevin from leaving. She's the almost-damn-queen of Montenero...no security is going to hold her up from chasing after her man who is getting ready to board a plane.  They get married by a priest who's about to miss his flight to London, because Kevin was actually going to ask her last summer and still carries the ring everywhere he goes. Fiona, meanwhile, was kind of left unattended at the church, so she makes a run for it, with a couple of crown jewels to show for it.

The coronation happens, the Aldovian Christmas Prince and princess and royal baby from that other Netflix movie series are there, and Margaret looks amazingly queenly (not quite the same budget as The Crown happening here, but inspiration taken for sure).  Ah, but looks like Fiona got caught and was escorted to the coronation by the police.  And Boss Nass holds up the glowing orb and shouts "peace"! Now all the Moteneroids and Gungans live happily ever after.

PS. There's no discussion, at all, about what's happening with Kevin's bakery in Chicago.  Don't worry Kevin, it's going to get shut down for COVID concerns in 4 months anyway.  Go live in your wife's estate and be happy.

The Draw:
I watched the first one and enjoyed it for its differences from the usual Hallmark/Lifetime fare, so I watched this one...remembering early on that it's not *that* different from the usual Hallmark/Lifetime fare.

The Formulae:
Stupid misundertandings because people don't frickin' talk to one another.  Playfully romantic(?) food fight.  Grownups, without any children around, building snowmen (and women...snowpeople).  The race to the airport. The gross, manipulative third party trying to snake his way between the romantic couple.

Unformulae:
All that, cheap boring action, and role switching.

True Calling?
It's true, the princess did switch again.

The Rewind:
They actually do a very shrewd job with the body doubles that you think you see multiple Hudgens in the same scene more often than you ever do.

The Regulars:
Almost the entire cast is the same from the last one.  Van Hudg is actually really great, crafting three distinct characters and making them play very well in disguise as the other ones.  It's kinda fun.

How does it Hallmark?
More engaging the the usual Hallmark fare, but that's not saying to much.  Much, much, much better production values.  Crowd scenes look crowded, the palace and decorations are gorgeous, the costuming is more than just H&M wear, and looks really really good.  Wigs and makeup are great (don't see to many wigs in Hallmark, do ya?) particularly in helping Van Hudg define her three personas.

How does it movie?
It's tough.  Van Hudg is so damn charming she makes almost anything worth watching...and yet this one's a bit of a mess.  It doesn't spend enough time with any of its plots to really make them stand out...the switch and double switch seem forced and really doesn't last all that long... the story relies upon people being oblivious when they should be more astute... and the contrivances are often too, too much.  I don't like that the stakes of the big evil switching plan was really just Kevin and Margaret's relationship.... there should have been grander stakes involving the well-being of the country...but then the typical audience for these things just wants the lightest and fluffiest escapist fare.

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

Maleficent

2014, d. Robert Stromberg - Disney+


Disney's animated cinematic output has included more than it's fair share of memorable heroes, but likewise it's produced many a striking villain as well.  Although, many of those villains were mature women envious of the attractive young princesses in their lives, which is certainly a problematic stereotype.

Maleficent comes from Disney's adaptation of the the Sleeping Beauty fable, and is here re-imagined/retconned not as an envious and vain queen but as a woman scorned.  Well, actually it's more brutal than that...far more brutal.

But first, we meet Maleficent as a bright and bubbly pre-teen.  She's a horned, winged faery and the benevolent ruler of the Moors, hidden away from the world of man.  She wakes up in the morning and greets her community much in the same way Paddington does in his films (although, Paddington's urban London environment is far less unappealing than this vibrant-bordering-on-garish looking CGI abominable reality).  Her attention is called to an outsider, a human boy who has stolen a gem from the waters of the Moors.  Large tree-like creature seek to restrain him when Maleficent smooths things over and befriends the orphaned peasant boy, Stefan.

Through montage and voice over we learn that Stefan and Maleficent become best of friends and eventually, in their teen years, a romantic couple.  But as Stefan ages, his ambition -- now an aide to the king -- starts to blind him to his love, and eventually their love fades.  The king attempts a conquest of the Moors and fails brutally, suffering a mortal wound.  On his death bed he offers his crown to anyone who brings him the head of the demon woman who leads the fae folk.

Stefan seeks out to warn her but in fact tricks her, drugs her and cuts off her wings.

Yes, you read that correctly.  He roofies Maleficent and violates her horrendously.

It's brutal and sobering and honestly shocking.  I don't know if the writer or director intended this to be such a strong rape allegory, but in the fallout scenes, Angelina Jolie performance is certainly playing the horror of it.  This isn't just a woman scorned, this isn't just the betrayal of her love, it's the vicious abuse of her body for a man to feel powerful.  She has every right to be angry, and for what she could do, following her painful recovery, she shows incredible restraint.

When she hears word of Stefan's daughter's birth, she enters the palace and curses the child, to prick her finger on her 16th birthday and sleep forever, granting the one concession of true love's kiss reawakening the child, believing herself that true love cannot exist.

Through vignettes (the whole film is pretty much a series of vignettes, kind of like old Disney storytelling in a way), we see Maleficent watching over the child with hatred, and yet the child reciprocates with smiles and affection.  As time passes Maleficent finds herself the shadow guardian of the child, or, as Aurora believes when she discovers Maleficent in broad daylight, she's her fairy godmother.

Now out in the open, Maleficent cant help but adore this child she's basically helped raise from a distance, but she also can't help but feel guilty for the curse she placed upon her.  Yadda yadda yadda true love's kiss followed by overlong action sequence, and a happy ending.

It really is a ghastly-looking film beyond some impeccable costuming and make-up (Maleficent is so striking)... had this been a practical film instead of largely CGI it would have been a real marvel.  But also the storytelling, the vignette-style, doesn't serve any of the characters particularly well.  Relationships between characters imply familiarity more that demonstrate it.  There could have been more time spent developing the relationship between Maleficent and Stefan, so that we see, rather than are told, about the distance that grew between them because of the cold and ambitious heart of man.  Then the betrayal and assault could have been far more shocking and upsetting, but perhaps, being a Disney film after all, they thought they would temper that by keeping focus squarely on Maleficent. 

This film barely holds together, at times, and even at a brisk 97 minutes (with lengthy credits) it drags in spots.  Jolie is marvelous, clearly knowing exactly what she wants to put into the role and exactly what we should be getting out of it... the rest of the cast needs more direction.  Sharlto Copley makes for an awkward Stefan.  We can see from the outset his intentions as Stefan (we're also basically told), so there's no moments where he doesn't have an air of nefariousness.  Elle Fanning plays the princess Aurora, and she's asked basically to be bright and sunny and love everything, which she does, but there's no personality behind the role, and really, not much of a role there for her to play.  She's the film's maguffin, in a sense, but she should have been more.

I'm not certain a...less novice director than Robert Stromber (his first film, coming from effects and art direction)  could have saved the vignette style of the script, but think of the meal Guillermo Del Toro could have made of this.  Word was Tim Burton was originally interested in directing, which is probably for the best he didn't as it would have been Alice In Wonderland Burton and not Edward Scissorhands Burton.  But Edward Scissorhands Burton would have been perfect as well.


I admire what Disney was trying to do with Maleficent as both a story and a character, and while the execution let the story down tremendously, the character actually comes through for the better.

[Toast's take from 2014, we agree]

Friday, June 30, 2017

3 Short Paragraphs: Moana

2016, Ron Clements & John Musker (Aladdin, Treasure Planet) -- download/Netflix

A co-worker has an animated GIF of Maui yelling "You're Welcome!", which he tosses at me every time I thank him for doing a good job. He knows it will spin off the song as an earworm in my head for the rest of the day. But thankgawds, something came along to replace "Let It Go" in the collective lexicon. Maui's song is bloody catchy, and I love the segment it is used in, as he dances around Moana explaining just how great he is, in a weird 3D animated on top of retro 2D animation backgrounds scene that harkens back to humans being green-screened onto animation. Brilliant.

P.S. The coworker regularly does good work.

I love this movie. It's not a Disney princess movie, and yet it is, despite Moana's protestations. She may be the chieftain's daughter but she ain't no princess. And she doesn't need any rescuing. Moana sees the plight of her people and heads into the open sea to seek the aid of demi-god Maui, to return the heart of Te Fiti, the island goddess from whom he stole. So, a guy was a jerk and its going to take a teenage girl to fix it. Good message.

But the message is not what makes this movie so charming. The two leads do. Auli'i Cravalho is incredible, her voice acting not only spot on, her little giggles and shocked sounds so genuine, but she lives the character. She is the character. Meanwhile Maui is a massive, super-deformed demi-god version of a person, bigger than life and played perfectly by The Rock.  Dwayne plays both cherubic and heroic perfectly. And doesn't sing half bad either. The movie is about how these two play off each other, how a teenage girl influences and eventually surpasses a hundreds of years old demi-god. That is what faeries tales should always be about.

Sunday, January 10, 2016

I Saw This!! What I Have Been Watching (Pt. 4)

For each post I put into this long running "What I Have Been Watching" I remember another show I completed in the past year or so, since I "regularly" updated what I was watching on TV. Some are things I have been watching forever, like Supernatural and some are astounding shows I am surprised I never covered, such as Humans.

But, for now, let's cover a couple of One Episode(s).

Colony, not the, is the new alien invasion show over on USA Network, starring Josh Holloway. This guy is good and deserves something stable, but he keeps getting put into sub-standard genre attempts. This one could be a good one, but I doubt it, as it had quite the lackluster first episode. Lackluster is actually pretty standard these days, as I am not sure what standard TV premieres now hold themselves to. Not everyone can have the wow factor of Mr. Robot had in their first.

The trend right now is to leak, or more accurately, show early. So, while I am still the downloader, this was not a under-the-table thing but fully supported by the producers. They are still figuring out the whole digital age thing.

Josh is an ex-military guy trying to survive in the oppressive post-invasion regime. Things are not horrible Falling Skies alien invasion bad, but more an Orwellian, occupation state. Some foodstuffs seem scarce and there are curfews and stories of the disappeared, but generally people live their day to days. When the aliens came, sections of the world (well, at least LA as its the only part of the world of which we know) were subdivided behind massive walls. And people are rarely allowed to pass from one to the other. Anyone who was in a section when the aliens came, has to stay -- Josh and his wife have lost their youngest son and Josh is obsessed with finding him. He doesn't get involved with the resistance (of course, there is a resistance) but he is using them to make headway into the other zone, to hunt for his son. And things go wrong.

Josh is caught and given an ultimatum --- help the puppet human leaders find the resistance and get his son back. Or take the fall for an attack and be disappeared along with all his remaining family. Seems like an easy decision to me, for you can accomplish more alive than you can thrown away in a hole. But his wife is upset, pissed he has agreed to be a collaborator. She has her own more personal reasons.

The drama was pretty standard fare, and the world being built reminded me very much of the original V series, but that may just be the whole LA vibe. We don't know who the aliens are, what they want or how things are going go, so there is lots left to explore. But I will leave it up to a couple of more episodes before I decide.

The Magicians (and the the is correct this time) is the adaptation of the popular series of books by Lev Grossman, another of the books that all my fantasy reading friends have commented about on Facebook but I never got around to reading, nor even finding much about. I believe it was compared to as the 'adult Harry Potter' but that is probably disingenuous.

So, there is another world of magic just out of our sight. Its not so much as hidden but highly managed so average muggles don't see it. Quentin Coldwater is nerd boy who doesn't fit in, has the perfectly lovely best friend whom he isn't sleeping with (but probably wants to), and an unhealthy obsession with some magic filled books from his childhood -- think Narnia.

Paths cross and suddenly he is made aware he has magic potential. And he has to write an entrance exam into Brakebills College, the Hogwarts of upstate New York? I assume it's on the same location as the Xavier School for the Gifted in this reality. He gets in, his friend doesn't, she gets depressed while he stresses out from studying.

The first episode was very very unbalanced. It was done as if they wanted to get quickly past the whole introduction of magic school idea and quickly into the Potter-esque plot of Quentin being the kid destined to fight the returning evil. We are given clues of how hard learning magic is, but never actually experience the difficulty, just Quentin twisting up his nose and whining while others around him seem to play with magic as a past time, very easily. And there was something very CW channel about all the kids, all being very stylish and very sexy, even the nerd girl was stunning and put her outfits together perfectly. Quentin himself was not so much as nerdy, as he was Brooklyn alterna-kid, ever so stylishly awkward.

I will watch the series if but for enough episodes to see where it is going. And two thumbs up on the number of pairs of thigh high socks. I hope they are a sign of their return to fashion.

So, from urban fantasy to straight up classic fantasy. The Sword of Shannara was the followup book for all Lord of the Rings fans to read.  It was Tolkien-light, borrowing most of the fellowship tropes but creating its own world that became very very popular in its own right. I believe I never got much past book... 3 ? I don't remember but I am sure I have one of those boxed sets of paperbacks on my shelf, from back in the day when those were a thing for Xmas gifts.

The Shannara Chronicles is that adaptation of the series come to TV, very loosely and not starting with the first book but with the latter two. We are following Wil Ohmsford and Elven princess Amberle as they try and stop the magical Elven tree from dying, releasing demons back into the world. They are being assisted by ancient druid Alanon, the patron saint of family drug recovery.

One thing I remember in reading the books was my annoyance at the merging of post-apocalypse science fiction with fantasy. I have always been perturbed by the blending of the genres, except when done from a pulp perspective, such as John Carter. But this show is going to just throw in with the current popularity of teen po-ap fiction and litter the visual countryside with fallen Seattle Needles and ruined buildings leaning against each other. And trolls that wear gas masks and armor made from.... street signs? How very Gamma World.

If The Magicians can be mocked for their pretty characters, then people are going to giggle at the Elves of this world. But for me, its always been the perfect way to depict the unearthly beauty of Elves -- make them 20sumthin super models. How else can you depict perfect beauty unless they are cast ever lovely, ever made up and always in the perfect clothes and of the perfect (??) weight? So, the Elves play out well for me, if they are a bit teen angsty.

Its a by the numbers low man against the evil magic of the world story, and not whatsoever the fellowship of the first book, so no LotR comparisons of yet. The lovely eared Elves are there, no Dwarves of yet and the only real monster was the demon lord Dagda Mor, and a few of his minions. Alanon was great, another perfect rendition of a character I would play in D&D. I will definitely be returning for more, but as for quality?  No, not really there. This is purely genre fodder for me.

Amusing note. I watched it on CTV which so very obviously blurred out the implied nudity from a couple of scenes. Marmy missed it, so she downloaded from the MTV source, and yes, the ever so faint hint of nudity was there --- making it ever so obviously blurred on Canadian TV. Ain't that the opposite.

Monday, February 2, 2015

Wintervision: New Mid-season TV

Galavant (Season 1) - Sundays @8 on ABC
Agent Carter (episodes 1-3) - Tusedays @9 onABC
Man Seeking Woman (episodes 1-3) - Wednesdays @10:30 on FXX
Schitt's Creek (episodes 1 & 3,4) - Tuesdays @9 on CBC
Young Drunk Punk (episode 1) - Wednesdays @8:30 on CityTV

---

I hadn't heard anything in advance about Galavant, a 1/2 hour medieval musical comedy that ABC was seemingly trying to bury on Sunday nights in the January post-holiday haze.  I caught wind of it only the Friday before the first episode aired on some website or another noting that Weird Al, Ricky Gervais and Rutger Hauer were all set to guest star on a, well, "medieval musical comedy".  This was most assuredly going to be a train wreck.  I mean it's early evening network television, how could it not be?  Plus, ABC was apparently trying to get rid of it quickly, running two episodes a night for four weeks.  Burning it off quickly was certainly a sign of its quality, right?

I tuned in to Galavant at 11PM for the Pacific time zone airing, as my wife had already ventured off to bed and I was reluctant (and a little embarrassed) to watch the show in front of her.  It's a medieval musical comedy for the 8PM timeslot on ABC for Pete's sake.  So imagine my surprise when I found myself rolling on the floor with utter glee for the better part of an hour.  Galavant defied even my  slimmest expectations and for the following three weeks it became appointment television.  When co-star Timothy Omundson appeared on The Soup with Joel McHale between week one and two, he created a bit of an impression on my wife, and even she was on board with it.


The show ambitiously strives to be a little bit of everything, even when it conflicts with itself: it's raunchy and kid-friendly at the same time; it's a period piece, but not outside of making modern references; it's genre busting, yet also genre embracing;  it's a funny musical, but the music is incredibly well-crafted, not dispensable.  It's a rare show that achieves everything it sets out to do, without pandering.  It's a show that toys with metatext, the characters often aware that they're in a production, but it doesn't break the wall too often that it knocks it down altogether.  And the comedy doesn't solely extend from their self awareness.  Both the plot and the characters are exceptionally playful, growing in ways that convention dictates, and in ways that wink at the convention, and then also in ways that are just out of left field.  The fact is that it plays with three genres at once (being medieval fantasies, musicals, and comedies) and so it has three different ways to toy around and play with characters, story, and song without exhausting the possibilities.

It's the show's pilot that hooked me, before it even the first commercial break by breaking the knights-and-princesses story cliche.  In the opening moments we meet Omundson, playing the giddily dainty King Richard, who has stolen legendary knight Galavant's true love Marlena, forcing her to marry him.  Played by the handsome, toothy Joshua Sasse, Galavant is dashing and charming, even when he falls prey to goofiness.  Galavant bursts in on the wedding, keen to fight for his love, but Marlena (Mallory Jansen playing a comedic iteration of Cersei from Game of Thrones) finds the wealth and power offered by Richard trumps true love and voluntarily elects to continue the wedding.

From there the plot fast forwards a number of months and thickens even more, with genuine intrigue that's funny, but no less exciting.  Galavant is in a rut, heartbroken, out of shape, drunk and broke, when Princess Isabella (the pristine Karen David) asks for his help in rescuing her parents and taking back her kingdom from King Richard.  What he doesn't know is that Richard has sent her to fetch Galavant so that he may kill him, since he suspects Marlena's apathy towards him has something to do with her residual feelings for Galavant (turns out not so much, she just despises him).

With the first two episodes setting up the general thrust of the show, the middle four jockey between establishing the status quo at the castle (Richard's search for manliness with his loyal guard Gareth [a very game Vinnie Jones], Marlena's infidelity and lust for power, some asides with the chef and jester) and the road trip taken by Princess Izzie, Galavant, and his squire Sid (Luke Youngblood, pop pop!).  The final two episodes bring the whole cast together for some really rich shenanigans that jump all over the place, potentially taking a lot of the characters out of character, but making for absolutely delightful entertainment.  The penultimate episode features the show's most riotously funny musical number as Sasse and Omundson, who have spent the majority of the series apart, come together for a little ditty about regicide.

The songs (from omposer Alan Menken (The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast) and lyricist Glenn Slater (Tangled)) of Galavant aren't particularly memorable, but they are exceptionally well executed, with the lyrics having to tow the line between genuine exposition and comedy, and faring quite well most of the time.  The best songs feature the characters singing sweetly about murder or death, or in the case of the romantic duets, mutual disgust leading to begrudging affection.  One of the smart moves the show makes with the songs is, unlike most musicals, these aren't big showy numbers.  Generally the songs remain contained to few people singing it, only occasionally breaking out into something bigger.  Beyond that, the songs act in the same way they normally do in musicals, as internal monologue, but what the show does is make them external, such that the other characters are kind of aware of what they are saying, though often not paying close attention.  It makes for a hearty giggle every time someone reacts to something in the song they're otherwise not supposed to hear.

I fell maddeningly in love with Galavant (the show, not the character).  It's truly an outstanding addition to the medieval fantasy comedy genre, that may even stack up to The Princess Bride in its ability to go for it (it will be interesting to note how well the show ages).  At eight episodes, it's really feature-film length but broken down episodically.  The cast is tremendous throughout, with Omundson the obvious breakout player, and will no doubt be seen cropping up more prominently between seasons.  The comedy doesn't aspire to be ground breaking, but entertaining, which it is, fully.  Where there's a handfull of "your mama" jokes and a play on Jon Hamm's name in the second episode that one could roll their eyes at, the show makes it clear that they know they're very silly and that it doesn't care.  It's game for anything.

Having bore witness to the majesty of Galavant, I have to wonder if the programming execs aren't actually subtly brilliant.  Burning through the show over four weeks with 1-hour blocks instead of eight 1/2 hour blocks perhaps serves the modern viewer a lot better, one more used to binge watching without waiting.  Given that Parks and Recreation is doing the same with its final season and that Agent Carter (which we'll get to in a moment) premiered with its first two episodes rather than just one, this may see a new trend on network TV.  In any case, ABC would do wise to know that too much of a good thing can spoil the soup, so the second season shouldn't go beyond 10 episodes.  Keeping the show at feature length will allow for quality songs, and tight storytelling that made the first season such a hit.  If they try to go full-season, it will burn itself out quickly.

---

With Agent Carter, I'm tempted to say "I love it" and just leave it at that.  But I can't.  I need to gush.

What a strange entity Agent Carter is.  Peggy Carter isn't exactly a prominent character in the Marvel Comics Universe, and I don't think there was any sort of fan clamor to see much more of Haley Atwell's character after the Captain America: The First Avenger film (as that film was more about getting people excited for Marvel's Avengers blockbuster).  But someone over at camp Marvel saw something special in Atwell and her performance as Peggy, commissioning her for a short film that was packaged as a special feature on the Iron Man 3 blu-ray.  After the short was well received, and the initial success of Agents of SHIELD, it was announced that Marvel was shopping around a Peggy Carter series.  The short helped sell people on the idea better, but even still it was met with some apathy.  Afterall, it's just Peggy Carter.  It's not Captain America, it's not any recognizable Marvel superhero, it's just Captain America's old-timey girlfriend.

It's that expectation that this series continually plays upon.  Peggy Carter, as a property and in the show, is completely underestimated by almost everyone around her.  The pilot episode goes to great lengths (and they are quite great) to show the audience, at the very least, what makes Peggy so special.  By mid-way through that first episode, I think everyone watching had bough in.  Agent Carter is amazing.

The crux of the show finds Peggy a low-level Agent at the SSR (Strategic Scientific Reserve), just one notch above receptionist essentially.  The SSR primary focus at the moment is finding Howard Stark, after it's discovered he had been manufacturing all kinds of dangerous weaponry and that somehow it's wound up in the hands of the enemy, a secret organization named Leviathan.  The SSR suspects that Stark sold the weapons, while Stark has secretly asked his old ally, Peggy, to help clear his name.  The conflict is obvious.  As Peggy gets deeper into understanding just Leviathan is, the more risk it poses not just to her physical well being, but to her status at the SSR and as an immigrant in America.

There's a lot of fuel for Agent Carter to mine:
First there's Peggy's past, having lost the man she loved (and not just any man, but Captain Frigging America) and her wounds still stinging.  She has a raw spot where Cap is concerned, and it's what allows Howard to manipulate her, while also keeping her from forging any bonds with anyone else.

Secondly, there's the time, set in the mid-1940s, post-war, women having had a taste of liberation during the war are being force back into the home as the men return to their jobs.  Women have proven themselves capable but are still deemed inferior.  The show manipulates this thread expertly, allowing Peggy to both stand in defiance of it, but also use it when its advantageous to her.  Her ability to stand up for herself, to handle herself in a fight, it shows her strength, but her manipulation of the institutionalized sexism and exploitation of people's misguided expectations shows her intelligence as much as her ability to piece together clues and perform fieldwork.  Atwell is an utter genius in this role.  She able to sell Peggy's toughness at every turn, but she's also equally capable of selling her intelligence.  Most times Atwell carries herself with such incredible confidence that its easy to believe she's the smartest person in the room (which she generally is).  At the same time, Peggy isn't flawless, and Atwell knows how to leave those chinks in her armor.  She's got her triggers that set her off or leave her blind, at the same time she's also not so smart as to be ahead of the story.  She's capable of failure and the stress of the work she does, the impact it has, breaks through emotionally from time to time.  How could anyone not be utterly infatuated with Atwell/Carter after watching this show?

Thirdly, the show exists in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (the "MCU") which allows it to connect with everything that has already gone on in both subtle and overt ways.  Naturally it's connected to the first Captain America movie, but it's also connected with the Iron Man series, since the world of Howard Stark (Tony's dad) plays prominently in the show.  It also pulls in elements from the comics that have yet to appear in the MCU, morphing them to the time period and giving them new life.  For the nerds in the crowd, it gives them the easter egg hunts they look for in genre adaptations, but it doesn't derail the show.  Unlike Agents of SHIELD this series manages to organically tie to the MCU and the source comics in a way that benefits the show, rather than being thrust upon it.

Not to harp upon Agents of SHIELD but where it faltered for so long was lack of purpose, lack of character clarity, lack of direction, and a general unease about its place in the world.  Agent Carter has none of that.  It knows where it fits, but it also doesn't seem to be as concerned (at least not yet) about fitting it.  From Peggy's first meeting with Howard in the pilot, it's absolutely clear what the show's mission statement is: find Howard's missing weapons, clear his name.  That it's also got a compressed season order -- only eight episodes -- means it's not farting around with side stories and tertiary character building.  It's story driven, almost cinematically, which most full-season shows can't sustain.  Likewise, it has an energy and confidence that Agents of SHIELD has strived for but never attained.  Weird that Agent Carter feels more like a Joss Whedon show (punchy dialogue, strong female protagonist) than the one he actually created.

I'm eager to see the series play out, but also just as keen to watch it again.  I'm an unabashed fan of The Flash and Arrow on the CW, and I even am modestly enjoying Agents of SHIELD, but those shows, despite my fandom, don't instill the craving to watch them over and over again.  Agent Carter I definitely want to go around again.  I hope that subsequent seasons run about the same episode order.  8 episodes allows for a much tighter series, and a much more enjoyable way to experience a different era of the Marvel CU.

---



Man Seeking Woman isn't the first comedy series about the dating life of the awkward adult male but ... wait, now that I think about it, perhaps it is.  Sure most comedies that feature single guys tend to have a heavy dating component with a revolving door of women, but those are mostly sitcoms where the situation is what the show is largely constructed around, not exploring dating and all the weird things (some) men go through emotionally and mentally throughout it.  Man Seeking Woman is a show that exclusively focuses on its lead character's dating life, much like any romantic comedy tends to do with its female protagonist.  The difference here is the show's heavy use of metaphor-as-reality to process the inner anxieties of the lead.  This may indeed be a dude's version of Sex and the City, The Mindy Project or The New Girl.

Jay Baruchel is perfectly cast as the average, somewhat awkward leading man.  I was surprised to learn that the role wasn't written with him in mind, for this is Baruchel's bread and butter (not that he can't play against type...see Goon for instance).  I was likewise fascinated to learn that this wasn't a product of the Apatow gang, instead coming from Saturday Night Live writer Simon Rich, based of his book of short stories, and produced by Lorne Michaels.  It's certainly a lot sharper and more daring than your typical SNL sketch (not that I don't have much affection for SNL).  But all that known, the show certainly makes more sense.  It does have the feel of a loosely sequential set of short stories or sketches.

The show's use of literal metaphors is what really makes it stand out.  The series picks ups as Josh, recently dumped by his fiancee, is picking up the last of his things.  He's an emotional wreck but putting on a brave face for his ex.  He steps out of her front door and it immediately starts to rain.  Pan wide and we see it's literally only raining on him.  Then a bird drops dead from the tree above, bouncing off him.  In the second vignette of the pilot, Josh is set up on a date with his sister, and she's a troll... literally a troll, but Josh, to his credit attempts to valiantly overlook this fact and engage with her, but he naturally finds it hard.  In the third act, Josh is invited to his ex's engagement party only to learn that her ex's new beau is Hitler... a 125-year-old, wheelchair bound Hitler (played under gobs of makeup by Bill Hader).  I genuinely love the way the show manifests emotional stress physically but doesn't just treat it as metaphor.  Gorbachenka the troll is aware she's a troll and has no apologies for it, and the patrons of the restaurant are well aware she's a troll and don't seem to care.  It seems to be only Josh's issue.  In synergy, the same applies to Hitler, where Josh is the only one outraged by his ex's new boyfriend (is it really because he's Hitler or just because he's dating his ex?).

The second episode uses this device expertly as Josh, wanting to text the girl he met on the train, freezes at the challenge.  His over-sexed best friend Mike (Eric Andre) keeps suggesting he send a dick pic, while his sister starts off strong but then likewise comes up clunky.  Smash cut to a war room where Josh takes in a series of suggestions from military advisers (fans of Battlestar Galactica will appreciate Michael Hogan's gruff one liners), the amount of time, angst and deliberation spent over what to say no doubt familiar to the average joe.  The episode ends after a miserably failed date with a montage of Josh's sad return home and shots of all the romantic things he did to set up, all underscored by sad 4-piece chamber music.  Josh steps into the kitchen where there's the 4-piece playing said underscore, and he tells them to pack up, that its not happening.  The exchange that follows is an utter delight.

The show delightfully toys with reality and surreality, presenting it all as real, but for the most part not unnatural.  In the third episode, Mike coaxes Josh into joining him on a club outing, but Josh knows all too well it's not his scene, so he finds distractions to prevent their outing.  "First, let just pound these beers real quick then we'll go, 5 minutes...", Josh says, and there's a goofy montage of them aggressively downing the beers to krunk music (and a barely audible aside noting "this is a terrible way to drink beer").  Then, stepping up to the club, Josh says, "We need to eat something, fuel for dancing and flirting...let's just pound some mexican food.  5 minutes?"  Cue montage in Josh's apartment with bags of groceries, a mexican cookbook, a mariachi band joining them, cooking up the burritos and serving an intricate meal.  Next in line at the club, Josh stalls once again: "Wait, let's just pound a 10,000 piece jigsaw puzzle first."  Cut to a montage of them finishing the puzzle in rapid order, mounting it, hanging it on the wall, taking a photo, adorning the cover of "Puzzle Aficionado" (it reads "Josh and Mike put it all together").  Finally entering the club, the last ones in, the bouncer lifts up the magazine in his hands, being the very same "Puzzle Aficionado" and exclaims "Oh shit, that was Mike and Josh!"  It comments on the excuses that guys put on to not get out and put themselves out there, and then delivers the comedy via an utterly absurd trio of montages that can't really be reality, but manages to present it as the reality of the show with a brilliantly unexpected tag.

One of the immediate draws of the show was that it was shot in Toronto... I always enjoy scoping out the backgrounds, seeing familiar locations repurposed... it's like a side game to the actual show.  It's not playing Toronto, because of course it's not, but it's also not playing really another setting either.  If anything it's an as yet unnamed fictional metropolis, which is perfect given the heavy fantasy-tinged elements of the show.

It's certainly an apt comedy for the FX stable fitting well as a sort of cross between Louis and Wilfred in a way.  It has a low-key, character-centric vibe to it that allows each vignette to move at its own pace.  It's not aiming for laugh-a-minute, and generally there's at least a kernel of truth behind every aspect of ridiculousness.  It's an immediate favourite.

---


Canadian television has a lot of great talent, but for the most part, that talent is wasted under low production values or scuttled off to America to actually do something worthwhile.  There's the odd breakthrough here or there, an SCTV or Kids In The Hall, a show that will be able to transcend its limitations through sheer inventiveness, but for the most part Canadian television strives to play broadly without any real panache and lacking a lot of interest as a result.  It's not just all about production values either, there's a general attitude to Canadian television, a slower pace, a decided lack of heightened reality that seem almost mandated to differentiate it from flashier materials south of the border.  We're all about moderation up here.

Schitt's Creek, in its most jaded summary, is a Canadian version of Arrested Development mashed with Green Acres, the premise of a rich family suddenly finding themselves on hard times and moving out to a rural community, in this case the aptly named "Schitt's Creek", a small town that Eugene Levy's patriarch had purchased as a joke a decade earlier for his son (played by Levy's actual son, Dan Levy).

When I first heard of the premise, this father-son cast, and it's groan inducing title, I wasn't very inclined to tune in.  The elder Levy has seemingly taken any job since American Pie, so he's not an outright indicator of quality, while the younger Levy was primarily a host on MTV Canada which isn't exactly a ringing endorsement for acting quality.  I had to wonder if the younger wasn't utilizing the cache of the elder in order to get himself a prominent role on TV.

Then I saw a few posters at bus stops around Toronto, and noticed a very persuasive additional cast member in Catherine O'Hara.  While Levy can't exactly be counted upon for starring in the best quality vehicles, O'Hara is nothing short of a comedy goddess and is always worth watching.  I was tentative still but I was definitely going to tune in.


The show is actually quite charming.  It's got the expected Canadian pacing but it's built more for an American cable-style audience (unfortunately it tries to pass itself off as set in America, though).  The addition of Chris Elliott to the cast as the town's mayor was a genuine surprise (most definitely a pleasant one as well).  The show wisely builds up its small town through its cast of supporting players, thus leaving the leads to their eccentricities (Eugene, surprisingly, the most straight-laced of the crew).  There are beats to this sort of comedy construct that seem almost unavoidable, such as the inevitable relationships formed between members of the upscale family and the rednecky townies, but it will be how the show handles its central characters in these beats that it can really differentiate itself.  So far it's not doing too badly.  The characters aren't horrendous people which is a good start, and the townies also aren't *that* rednecky.  I'm actually keen to watch this, so long as convention doesn't start to set in and O'Hara keeps doing what she does so well.

---

Young Drunk Punk is a Canadian show that makes no illusions about where it's set: Calgary, 1980.  Unlike the classic The Wonder Years, this show isn't trying for full-on earnestness.  It's a period sitcom, like That 70's Show (only more single camera, no studio audience, perhaps more akin to The Goldbergs...I dunno, I haven't seen it), taking advantage of the culture of its setting, juxtaposing, these kids deep into punk music and the aesthetic against the suburbs of Calgary and its cowboy hat-clad denizens.  

The show comes from Kids in the Hall alum Bruce McCulloch (who co-stars as the father of the main character) and it does feature a lot of his usual touchstones, although a bit more gentle.  Where his Kids in the Hall sketches that related to father-son dynamics were quite dark, here the father-son dynamic is a strained one where the two lack any real understanding of the other, it's not irreparably distant or in any way abusive.  Likewise McCulloch's sketches from his mid-20s relating to his youth featured a radical sense of anarchy and misdirected aggression, here, again, it's softer revolting, in part to make the characters not jerks and to make their antics more cartoonishly amusing.  This is not to say that the show is toothless, but rather that it's not trying to bite anything.  It's focused on being amusing, not making any grand statements or pushing comedic boundaries.  Of the Canadian sitcoms to crop up in recent years, this is the first one since Corner Gas that feels like it has any real legs.

The series opens at a fascinating point, with the lead, Ian (Tim Carlson), and his best friend Shinky (Atticus Mitchell) attending their high-school graduation, usurping the valedictorian speech for a dose of their style of anarchy (which comes mainly in the form of trying to expose their peers to greatness of punk music).  Where most coming-of-age comedies of this sort revolve around the awkwardness of high school for outsiders like Ian and Shinky, this show starts by showing they made it through, confident in who they are, but unsure of where to go from there.  In 1980, graduating high-school still primarily meant going out and getting a job, rather than considering college or university, and Ian's dad forces him out into the job market by decreeing he pay rent.  Ian's plans to go live with his sister are curtailed when she returns home after breaking up with her boyfriend (who Ian snidely nicknames "Cowboy", as he's nicknamed all her boyfriends).  The second episode finds Ian and Shinky doing pick-up manual labor, winding up working for Cowboy at a ridiculously hazardous job site full of desperate men.

The cast is quite great.  McCulloch as Lloyd is allowed to be both the authority and the oddball, playing into his strengths while also being very amusing.  Tracy Ryan as Helen, Ian's mom, is likewise given a choice role in being in charge, prim, but not your typical prude or humourless housewife (she works at Woolworths), and one has to wonder if she's oblivious or indifferent to what exactly it is her family is doing (so long as they're playing by her rules she seems okay).  It's too bad that Ian's sister, Belinda is yet another vapid, oversexed dumb bunny, but Allie MacDonald has nailed the role, and in Belinda's favour is that she's not yet a direct antagonist for Ian (they seem to have worked past that, although they're not in any way accepting of each other's lifestyle choices).  Of course it's Carlson and Mitchell as Ian and Shinky that the show hinges and both are thoroughly up to the task.  They live in the clothes like they were actually theirs and they are more than adept at delivering a well-timed one-liner as well as pulling out a physical performance.  The opening sequence of the second episode finds Ian taking punches outside a bar while Shinky watches and eggs him on (a familiar skit from Kids in the Hall) only for the reveal that they're trying out to be bouncers.  Carlson can take his lumps very well.

It's a genuinely entertaining show, upholding American-style production values and single-camera comedy pacing, but not losing any sense of Canadian-ness either.  I take some pleasure in recognizing that this would likely play just as well in the states as That 70's Show played in Canada.  It's quite accessible and fun.  I don't know if it sustains for four or more seasons how strong its legs will be, but I have no doubt that a solidly amusing first season is in store.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

3 Short Paragraphs: Frozen

2013, Chris Buck, Jennifer Lee -- download

Delete delete delete. Enough introspection! This is a Disney animated princess movie, for gawd's sake Toasty! Its the one that spawned that irri... catchy song that all the kids and coworkers are singing! It has a talking snowman voiced by not-Jonah Hill !  It stars Kristen Bell (Veronica Mars herself) and Idina Menzel (the rival for the princess from Enchanted and the actual singing voice of the character) and solidifies (pun intended) the trend that princesses do not need princes to be fulfilled. But yeah, you all saw it and I am just getting around to it, long after Marmy watched it and after it has been growing stale in our Downloads folder.

In the past, Marmy and I would have been into seeing this movie on its first week, in the cinema. We were part of the resurrection of the Disney animation moment. We saw them all, bought them all and she (with me joining occasionally) re-watching them all on a regular, constant basis. That was the VHS days when Disney had its very smart, back-into-the-vault, lucrative business model of selling and re-releasing the expensive tapes. I was even briefly part of the after-market of finding and reselling these movies, often for vast markup.  Mulan was the last one we made a concerted effort to see cinema-wize, we did see Rapunzel and rather enjoyed it actually, and we were rather disappointed with Brave.  I guess we shall have to see what comes next to determine if we have ended our run of princess cinema viewing.

So, don't like musicals, tired of princesses and already annoyed by the song. So, what did I watch this movie for? World Building!! You have a northern kingdom, obviously wealthy, with a great port but imposing, towering mountains behind it. Part of the plot is someone trying to establish trade relations with the kingdom, so they must have something worth selling. Wood? Fish? Mining? And like all faery tale kingdoms, it seems focused on a single village surrounding a castle. Where is the rest of the kingdom? What is out there? Is this one island in a chain of islands that feed the wealth of its hereditary rulers? And what about the magic? Obviously the fae folk have a place in this world, so is she also of fae blood? Perhaps this kingdom is a last vestige of elfen magic in an increasingly mundane world? Perhaps that was the wealth their southern neighbours were hoping to buy into? Alas, I am always left to my own devices when pondering these dilemmas. Maybe, someday, someone will release a coffee table book about a faery tale movie that answers all these nagging questions.

P.S. Kent's view was less chilly than mine, pun intended.